CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 355Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionWorkplace Health and Well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 117 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mindfulness at Work: A New Approach to Improving Individual and Organizational Performance

Hyland, Patrick K., Lee, R. Andrew, Mills, Maura J.·2015·Industrial and Organizational Psychology
DOI 10.1017/iop.2015.41
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In recent years the concept of mindfulness has become increasingly popular, and with good reason. A growing body of research indicates that mindfulness provides a number of physical, psychological, and even performance benefits. As a result, some organizations have started offering mindfulness programs to their employees. But despite growing interest, mindfulness has received little attention from the industrial–organizational community. In this article, we provide an overview of what mindfulness is, where the concept came from, how it has been utilized and studied to date, and what its application in the work setting is. We also propose new directions for researchers and practitioners.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/iop.2015.41

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 117 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Thondup, 1996, The healing power of mind
  2. Langer, 1989, Mindfulness
  3. Kabat-Zinn, 1990, Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your mind to face stress, pain, and illness
  4. 2014, Stress in America: Are teens adopting adults’ stress habits?
  5. 2005, Realizing the full potential of rising talent
  6. Bond, 2006, Acceptance and mindfulness at work: Applying acceptance and commitment therapy and relational frame theory to organizational behavior management, 25
  7. Buchheld, 2001, Measuring mindfulness in insight meditation (vipassana) and meditation-based psychotherapy: The development of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI), Journal for Meditation and Meditation Research, 1, 11
  8. 1973, The heart of Buddhist meditation
  9. Hayes, 2004, Mindfulness and acceptance: Expanding the cognitive-behavioral traditions, 1
  10. Hogan, 2010, American Psychological Association handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 555
  11. 1999, Stress

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–355 of 355

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hyland, P. K., Lee, R. A., & Mills, M. J.
Affiliations
Hofstra University (US)
Corresponding author
Hyland, Patrick K.
ORCID
Mills, Maura J.
Venue
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2015-07-15
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
576-602
ISSN
  • 1754-9426 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-9434
DOI
10.1017/iop.2015.41
OpenAlex
W1907750476
Cited by
355
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 20
FWCI
31.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified)
Locations
  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
mindfulness, employee performance, organizational performance, mindfulness-based interventions, work psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review