Cited by 40Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Relating Ediacaran Fronds

Open access
Dececchi, T. Alexander, Narbonne, Guy M., Greentree, Carolyn, Laflamme, Marc·2017·Paleobiology

Abstract

Ediacaran fronds are key components of terminal-Proterozoic ecosystems. They represent one of the most widespread and common body forms ranging across all major Ediacaran fossil localities and time slices postdating the Gaskiers glaciation, but uncertainty over their phylogenetic affinities has led to uncertainty over issues of homology and functional morphology between and within organisms displaying this ecomorphology. Here we present the first large-scale, multigroup cladistic analysis of Ediacaran organisms, sampling 20 ingroup taxa with previously asserted affinities to the Arboreomorpha, Erniettomorpha, and Rangeomorpha. Using a newly derived morphological character matrix that incorporates multiple axes of potential phylogenetically informative data, including architectural, developmental, and structural qualities, we seek to illuminate the evolutionary history of these organisms. We find strong support for existing classification schema and devise apomorphy-based definitions for each of the three frondose clades examined here. Through a rigorous cladistic framework it is possible to discern the pattern of evolution within and between these clades, including the identification of homoplasies and functional constraints. This work both validates earlier studies of Ediacaran groups and accentuates instances in which previous assumptions of their natural history are uninformative.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/pab.2016.54

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The minimum age for marine planktonic algae (Archaeplastida) is 659-645 Ma.

    “Minimum age for marine planktonic algae (Archaeplastida) 659-645 Ma (124)”

    From Integrated records of environmental change and evolution challenge the Cambrian Explosion (2019) · cites this paper as [124]

    The Introduction dates the Ediacara biota to 571–541 Ma, and the Discussion concerns relationships among Ediacaran fronds. Searches for marine planktonic algae, Archaeplastida, and 659–645 Ma found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed minimum age. Page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]20. Grazhdankin, D. V., and A. Seilacher. 2002. Underground Vendo- bionta from Nambia. Journal of Paleontology 88:269-283.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dececchi, T. A., Narbonne, G. M., Greentree, C., & Laflamme, M.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Paleobiology
Published
2017-03-07
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
171-180
ISSN
  • 0094-8373 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5331
OpenAlex
W2533084955
Cited by
40
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Paleobiology (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
  • QSpace (Queen's University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
phylogenetic relatedness, homology, functional morphology, homoplasy, functional constraints, evolutionary history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review