Cited by 74Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Increase in metazoan ecosystem engineering prior to the Ediacaran–Cambrian boundary in the Nama Group, Namibia

Open access
Cribb, Alison T., Kenchington, Charlotte G., Koester, Bryce, Gibson, Brandt M., Boag, Thomas H., Racicot, Rachel A., Mocke, Helke, Laflamme, Marc +1 more·2019·Royal Society Open Science

Abstract

The disappearance of the soft-bodied Ediacara biota at the Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary potentially represents the earliest mass extinction of complex life, although the precise driver(s) of this extinction remain unresolved. The 'biotic replacement' model proposes that an evolutionary radiation of metazoan ecosystem engineers in the latest Ediacaran profoundly altered marine palaeoenvironments, resulting in the extinction of Ediacara biota and setting the stage for the subsequent Cambrian Explosion. However, metazoan ecosystem engineering across the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition has yet to be quantified. Here, we test this key tenet of the biotic replacement model by characterizing the intensity of metazoan bioturbation and ecosystem engineering in trace fossil assemblages throughout the latest Ediacaran Nama Group in southern Namibia. The results illustrate a dramatic increase in both bioturbation and ecosystem engineering intensity in the latest Ediacaran, prior to the Cambrian boundary. Moreover, our analyses demonstrate that the highest-impact ecosystem engineering behaviours were present well before the onset of the Cambrian. These data provide the first support for a fundamental prediction of the biotic replacement model, and evidence for a direct link between the early evolution of ecosystem engineering and the extinction of the Ediacara biota.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsos.190548

Cites

70 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increasing atmospheric oxygen concentration may have deepened the redoxcline, extending habitable water depths, promoted animal-sediment mixing, and allowed for the evolution of more metabolically costly ecologies such as carnivory, in turn driving a predator-prey "arms race" and hence diversification.

    “Increasing atmospheric oxygen concentration may have deepened the redoxcline, so extending habitable water depths, promoted animal-sediment mixing [e.g., (52)], and allowed for the evolution of more metabolically costly ecologies such as carnivory, in turn driving a predator-prey “arms race” and hence diversification (53).”

    From Sea level controls on Ediacaran-Cambrian animal radiations (2024) · cites this paper as [52]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [41]Schmitz MD 2012 Radiogenic isotope geochronology. In Geologic timescale 2012 (eds Gradstein F, Ogg J, Ogg G), pp. 427– 449. Boston, MA: Elsevier.
  2. [42]Narbonne GM, Xiao S, Shields G 2012 Ediacaran Period, ch. 18. In Geologic timescale 2012 (eds Gradstein F, Ogg J, Ogg G), pp. 427– 449. Boston, MA: Elsevier.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cribb, A. T., Kenchington, C. G., Koester, B., Gibson, B. M., Boag, T. H., Racicot, R. A., Mocke, H., Laflamme, M., & Darroch, S. A. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Geological Survey of Namibia (NA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Cribb, Alison T.
Venue
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2019-09-25
Volume
6
Issue
9
Pages
190548
ISSN
2054-5703 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2976998112
Cited by
74
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Royal Society Open Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DEB 1331980, PLR 134175)
  • Paleontological Society (Arthur James Boucot Award, Student Research Grant)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN 435402)
  • National Geographic Society (9968-16)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
bioturbation, Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary, Ediacara biota, Cambrian explosion, Nama Group, trace fossils

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review