The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cues that Matter: How Political Ads Prime Racial Attitudes During Campaigns
Abstract
Recent evidence suggests that elites can capitalize on preexisting linkages between issues and social groups to alter the criteria citizens use to make political decisions. In particular, studies have shown that subtle racial cues in campaign communications may activate racial attitudes, thereby altering the foundations of mass political decision making. However, the precise psychological mechanism by which such attitudes are activated has not been empirically demonstrated, and the range of implicit cues powerful enough to produce this effect is still unknown. In an experiment, we tested whether subtle racial cues embedded in political advertisements prime racial attitudes as predictors of candidate preference by making them more accessible in memory. Results show that a wide range of implicit race cues can prime racial attitudes and that cognitive accessibility mediates the effect. Furthermore, counter-stereotypic cues—especially those implying blacks are deserving of government resources—dampen racial priming, suggesting that the meaning drawn from the visual/narrative pairing in an advertisement, and not simply the presence of black images, triggers the effect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
Is Anyone Responsible?: How Television Frames Political Issues
Iyengar, S. (1991) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226388533.001.0001 · Cited by 3,722
Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study
Petrocik, J. R. (1996) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111797 · Cited by 2,902
(1987) · Cited by 2,656
An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy.
Young, K., Myrdal, G., Sterner, R., & Rose, A. (1944) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2086087 · Cited by 2,016
Divided by color racial politics and democratic ideals
Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1996) · Cited by 1,985
Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life.
Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1981) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.40.3.414 · Cited by 1,983
Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy
Gilens, M. (1999) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226293660.001.0001 · Cited by 1,659
Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance
Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2952075 · Cited by 1,422
Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1986) · Cited by 1,374
Cited by
Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600 · Cited by 2,125
What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat
Brader, T., Valentino, N. A., & Suhay, E. (2008) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00353.x · Cited by 1,313
Self-citationHow Conditioning on Posttreatment Variables Can Ruin Your Experiment and What to Do about It
Montgomery, J. M., Nyhan, B., & Torres, M. (2018) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12357 · Cited by 800
Does Diversity Erode Social Cohesion? Social Capital and Race in British Neighbourhoods
Letki, N. (2008) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00692.x · Cited by 538
How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization
Rogowski, J. C., & Sutherland, J. L. (2016) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-015-9323-7 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- VALENTINO, N. A., HUTCHINGS, V. L., & WHITE, I. K.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-90
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2126566434
- Cited by
- 770
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 70.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cues that Matter: How Political Ads Prime Racial Attitudes During Campaigns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0003055402004240
- The paper
- VALENTINO, N. A., HUTCHINGS, V. L., & WHITE, I. K. (2002). Cues that Matter: How Political Ads Prime Racial Attitudes During Campaigns. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055402004240
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.