Cited by 1,313Migration, Refugees, and IntegrationSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPopulism, Right-Wing Movements

What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat

Open access
Brader, Ted, Valentino, Nicholas A., Suhay, Elizabeth·2008·American Journal of Political Science

Abstract

We examine whether and how elite discourse shapes mass opinion and action on immigration policy. One popular but untested suspicion is that reactions to news about the costs of immigration depend upon who the immigrants are.We confirm this suspicion in a nationally representative experiment: news about the costs of immigration boosts white opposition far more when Latino immigrants, rather than European immigrants, are featured. We find these group cues influence opinion and political action by triggering emotions—in particular, anxiety—not simply by changing beliefs about the severity of the immigration problem. A second experiment replicates these findings but also confirms their sensitivity to the stereotypic consistency of group cues and their context. While these results echo recent insights about the power of anxiety, they also suggest the public is susceptible to error and manipulation when group cues trigger anxiety independently of the actual threat posed by the group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00353.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emotions such as anxiety, anger, fear, and contempt mediate the relation between some threats and prejudice toward immigrants.

    “There is also evidence that emotions such as anxiety, anger, fear, and contempt mediate the relation between some of the threats mentioned above and prejudice toward immigrants (Brader et al. 2008, Gadarian & Albertson 2014, Landmann et al. 2019).”

    From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Brader et al. 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brader, T., Valentino, N. A., & Suhay, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
American Journal of Political Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09-29
Volume
52
Issue
4
Pages
959-978
ISSN
  • 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5907
OpenAlex
W2130649638
Cited by
1,313
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 91 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 131 · 2020: 160 · 2019: 137 · 2018: 78 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 48
FWCI
76.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Keywords
immigration policy, Latino immigrants, European immigrants, anxiety, elite discourse, news framing, political action, stereotypes, emotional responses to news

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review