The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explaining Support for Combatants during Wartime: A Survey Experiment in Afghanistan
Abstract
How are civilian attitudes toward combatants affected by wartime victimization? Are these effects conditional on which combatant inflicted the harm? We investigate the determinants of wartime civilian attitudes towards combatants using a survey experiment across 204 villages in five Pashtun-dominated provinces of Afghanistan—the heart of the Taliban insurgency. We use endorsement experiments to indirectly elicit truthful answers to sensitive questions about support for different combatants. We demonstrate that civilian attitudes are asymmetric in nature. Harm inflicted by the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) is met with reduced support for ISAF and increased support for the Taliban, but Taliban-inflicted harm does not translate into greater ISAF support. We combine a multistage sampling design with hierarchical modeling to estimate ISAF and Taliban support at the individual, village, and district levels, permitting a more fine-grained analysis of wartime attitudes than previously possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (2000) · Organizational Identity · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199269464.003.0005 · Cited by 12,487
The Social psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,577
Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War
FEARON, J. D., & LAITIN, D. D. (2003) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055403000534 · Cited by 7,366
Greed and grievance in civil war
Collier, P. (2004) · Oxford Economic Papers · doi:10.1093/oep/gpf064 · Cited by 6,101
Kuper, L., & Horowitz, D. L. (1986) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2069338 · Cited by 4,869
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 · Cited by 4,583
Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
Cooper, T. (1976) · Military Medicine · doi:10.1093/milmed/141.8.521 · Cited by 3,993
The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?
Brewer, M. B. (1999) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00126 · Cited by 3,494
The Logic of Violence in Civil War
Kalyvas, S. N. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818462 · Cited by 3,314
Cited by
The Determinants of Environmental Migrants' Conflict Perception
Koubi, V., Böhmelt, T., Spilker, G., & Schaffer, L. (2018) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818318000231 · Cited by 96
Do U.S. Drone Strikes Cause Blowback? Evidence from Pakistan and Beyond
Shah, A. (2018) · International Security · doi:10.1162/isec_a_00312 · Cited by 95
Drought, Local Institutional Contexts, and Support for Violence in Kenya
Linke, A. M., Witmer, F. D. W., O’Loughlin, J., McCabe, J. T., & Tir, J. (2018) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002717698018 · Cited by 77
Environmental migrants and social-movement participation
Koubi, V., Nguyen, Q., Spilker, G., & Böhmelt, T. (2021) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343320972153 · Cited by 59
Drones and Support for the Use of Force
Walsh, J., & Schulzke, M. (2018) · doi:10.3998/mpub.9946611 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- LYALL, J., BLAIR, G., & IMAI, K.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 679-705
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2169685578
- Cited by
- 527
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 147.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explaining Support for Combatants during Wartime: A Survey Experiment in Afghanistan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0003055413000403
- The paper
- LYALL, J., BLAIR, G., & IMAI, K. (2013). Explaining Support for Combatants during Wartime: A Survey Experiment in Afghanistan. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055413000403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
