The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Food restriction as a cause of stereotypic behaviour in tethered gilts
Abstract
The behaviour of Large White × Landrace gilts tethered in stalls was studied by scan sampling from 07.00 to 17.00 h on 3 days consecutively every 5 weeks. Results are presented on 30 gilts sampled during their first 5 weeks in the house, period 1, and on 36 gilts during the following 5-week period, period 2. Twenty individuals were common to both samples. Gilts were fed at 08.00 h with a pelleted complete diet, either on low food levels (1·25 to 2·00 kg) or on high food levels (2·2 to 4·0 kg). In both periods behaviour was strongly related to food allowance in individual gilts. Gilts on low food levels spent a greater proportion of their time in the standing position than those on high food levels (period 1, medians 0·31 and 0·12 respectively; period 2, medians 0·27 and 0·11 respectively), spent more time in repetitive behaviour (period 1, medians 0·22 and 0·04 respectively; period 2, medians 0·16 and 0·07 respectively) and spent a greater proportion of their standing time in repetitive behaviour (period 1, medians 0·46 and 0 respectively; period 2, medians 0·30 and 0 respectively). Similarly, all three measures of behaviour correlated negatively with food allowance overall, but there was some indication that food level had a threshold effect, with more activity and repetitive behaviour occurring on food levels below about 2 kg. These results suggest that if food allowances are low tether stalls are not a suitable system of housing for pregnant sows.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stereotypies: a critical review
Mason, G. J. (1991) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80640-2 · Cited by 1,295
Sources of stress in captivity
Morgan, K. N., & Tromborg, C. T. (2007) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.032 · Cited by 1,085
From an animal's point of view: Motivation, fitness, and animal welfare
Dawkins, M. S. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00077104 · Cited by 1,014
Spruijt, B. M., van den Bos, R., & Pijlman, F. T. A. (2001) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/s0168-1591(00)00204-5 · Cited by 436
Behavioural deprivation: A central problem in animal welfare
Dawkins, M. S. (1988) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/0168-1591(88)90047-0 · Cited by 362
Metadata
- Authors
- Appleby, M. C., & Lawrence, A. B.
- Venue
- Animal Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1987-08
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-110
- ISSN
- 1357-7298 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-748X
- OpenAlex
- W2105195070
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 47.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Food restriction as a cause of stereotypic behaviour in tethered gilts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0003356100036680
- The paper
- Appleby, M. C., & Lawrence, A. B. (1987). Food restriction as a cause of stereotypic behaviour in tethered gilts. Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003356100036680
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.