The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recognising strategies for conquered territories: a case study from the Inka North Calchaquí Valley
Abstract
In this detailed study of fifteenth-century settlements in Argentina, the authors show how the Inka did not just use force, production and ritual to subdue the indigenous population. The conquerors' strategy included the re-ordering of settlement plans, routeways and landscape, class separation and even the imposition of a rigorous discipline on the indigenous vision, controlling what could be seen looking out or looking in. The material readings made in these South American examples have much to offer to archaeologists working in colonial periods elsewhere.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“in accordance with what has been observed, on a different scale, in other sites of this area (e. g.Acuto et al., 2012, Giovannetti, 2016).”
From Under the eye of the Apu. Paths and mountains in the Inka settlement of the Hualfín and Quimivil valleys, NW Argentina (2017) · cites this paper as Acuto et al., 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- Acuto, 2011, Experiencia de la muerte y la representación de las personas en las prácticas funerarias del Valle Calchaquí Norte, Comechingonia, Revista de Antropología, 14, 23, 10.37603/2250.7728.v14.n1.17891 · DOI
- Murra, 1978, La organización económica del Estado Inca
- Coben, 2006, Archaeology of performance, 223
- Acuto, 2008, Arqueología del extremo sur del continente americano. Resultados de nuevos proyectos, 11
- 10.1007/978-0-387-74907-5_40 · DOI
- Bauer, 2001, Ritual and pilgrimage in the ancient Andes. The islands of the Sun and the Moon, 10.7560/708891 · DOI
- 10.1007/0-306-48652-0_14 · DOI
- Villacorta, 2003, Palacios y ushnus: curacas del Rimac y gobierno inca en la costa central, Boletín de Arqueología PUCP, 7, 151, 10.18800/boletindearqueologiapucp.200301.007 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-0-387-76910-3_9 · DOI
- Hyslop, 1990, Inka settlement planning., 10.7560/738522 · DOI · Paper page
- Zuidema, 1989, Reyes y guerreros, 402
- Morris, 2003, La plaza central de Huánuco Pampa: espacio y transformación, Boletín de Arqueología PUCP, 7, 133, 10.18800/boletindearqueologiapucp.200301.006 · DOI
- Farrington, 2003, Nuevos cánones de arquitectura inka: investigaciones en el sitio de Tambokancha-Tumibamba, Jaquijahuana, Cuzco, Boletín de Arqueología PUCP, 7, 57, 10.18800/boletindearqueologiapucp.200301.003 · DOI
- Hyslop, 1979, El área Lupaca bajo el dominio incaico. Un reconocimiento arqueológico, Histórica, 3, 53, 10.18800/historica.197901.003 · DOI
- Kaulicke, 2003, Agua, ancestros y arqueología del paisaje, Boletín de Arqueología PUCP, 7, 27, 10.18800/boletindearqueologiapucp.200301.002 · DOI
- Ambrosetti, 1907, Exploraciones arqueológicas en la ciudad prehistórica de La Paya
- 10.1017/CBO9780511558221.013 · DOI
- Alcock, 2001, Empires: perspectives from archaeology and history
- Morris, 2007, Variations in the expression of Inka power, 135
- Malpass, 2010, Distant provinces in the Inka empire, 1
- Niles, 1992, The ancient Americas: art from sacred landscapes, 346
- Van De Guchte, 1999, The archaeologies of landscapes: contemporary perspectives, 149
- Pease, 1982, The Inca and Aztec states, 1400-1800, 173
- Gifford C. 2003. Local matters: encountering the imperial Inkas in the South Andes. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Columbia University.
- Dillehay, 2003, El colonialismo Inka, el consumo de chicha y los festines desde una perspectiva de banquetes políticos, Boletín de Arqueología PUCP, 7, 355, 10.18800/boletindearqueologiapucp.200301.015 · DOI · Paper page
- Besom, 2009, Of summits and sacrifices. An ethnohistoric study of Inka religious practices, 10.7560/719774 · DOI
- D'Altroy, 2000, Inka rule in the Northern Calchaquí Valley, Argentina, Journal of Field Archaeology, 27, 1
- D'Altroy, 2002, The Incas
- Troncoso, 2004, El arte de la dominación: arte rupestre y paisaje durante el período incaico en la cuenca superior del río Aconcagua, Chungará, Revista de Antropología Chilena, 36, 553
- Díaz, 1981, Diario de excavación realizada en el sitio La Paya SSalCac 1
- Niles, 1999, The shape of Inca history. Narrative and architecture in an Andean empire.
- Acuto F.A. 2004. Landscapes of ideology and inequality: experiencing Inka domination. Unpublished PhD dissertation, State University of New York, Binghamton.
- 10.1007/978-0-387-74907-5_41 · DOI
- Morris, 1987, Arquitectura y estructura del espacio en Huánuco Pampa, Cuadernos Instituto Nacional de Antropología, 12, 27
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lynch, J., & Parcero-Oubiña, C. (2017) · Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.09.019 · Cited by 13
Parcero-Oubiña, C., Fábrega-Álvarez, P., & Lynch, J. (2024) · Cambridge Archaeological Journal · doi:10.1017/s0959774323000240 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Acuto, F. A., Troncoso, A., & Ferrari, A.
- Venue
- Antiquity
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 334
- Pages
- 1141-1154
- ISSN
- 0003-598X
- 1745-1744
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
