The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Archaeological investigations in the Northern Highlands of Ecuador at Hacienda Zuleta
Abstract
Hacienda Zuleta in the northern sierra province of Imbabura, Ecuador is the location of the largest 'ramp-mound' site of the Caranqui culture dated to the Late Period in the highlands chronological sequence (c. AD 1250-1525) and also of a large 17th-century Colonial period hacienda of Jesuit foundation. The Late Period is characterised by the construction of very large hemispherical or quadrilateral 'pyramid tolos, sometimes with a ramp or a long 'walkway' and up to 22 of these ramp-tola sites have been identified in the northern sierra provinces of northern Pichincha and Imbabura (Gondard & L6pez 1983; Knapp 1992). They are thought to have been the political centres of the region's paramount chiefs and the ceremonial foci for their scattered communities (Salomon 1986). Studies suggest they are contemporary with one another, originating from about the 8th to loth centuries AD (Athens 1978; 1992; Oberem 1975), although the phases of occupation associated with the creation of the large quadrilateral ramp mounds seem to be later, linked to socio-economic and political trends of agricultural intensification and increasing population densities which are also taken to characterize the Late Period.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Native Lords of Quito in the Age of the Incas: The Political Economy of North Andean Chiefdoms
Salomon, F. (1986) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511558146 · Cited by 304
Andean Ecology: Adaptive Dynamics in Ecuador
Bebbington, A., & Knapp, G. W. (1992) · Bulletin of Latin American Research · doi:10.2307/3338885 · Cited by 39
Athens, J. S. (1992) · Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology/Interdisciplinary contributions to archaeology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-6416-1_9 · Cited by 11
University of York, & Currie, E. J. (2001) · Internet Archaeology · doi:10.11141/ia.10.5 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Oberem, 1975, Estudios sobre la arqueologia del Ecuador, 3, 71
- Knapp, 1998, Actividad volcánica y Pueblos Precolombinos en el Ecuador:, 139
- Gondard, 1983, Inventario Arqueológico Preliminar de los Andes Septentrionales del Ecuador
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Covey, R. A. (2008) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-008-9021-7 · Cited by 101
The plinian fallout associated with Quilotoa's 800 yr BP eruption, Ecuadorian Andes
Mothes, P. A., & Hall, M. L. (2008) · Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research · doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.05.018 · Cited by 38
Wilson, C., Simpson, I. A., & Currie, E. J. (2002) · Geoarchaeology · doi:10.1002/gea.10015 · Cited by 30
Self-citationDyrdahl, E., & Speakman, R. J. (2013) · ACS Symposium Series · doi:10.1021/bk-2013-1147.ch012 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Currie, E. J.
- Venue
- Antiquity
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 284
- Pages
- 273-274
- ISSN
- 0003-598X (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1744
- OpenAlex
- W2463082486
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Antiquity (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Latin American history and culture
- Keywords
- Late Period, Imbabura, Pichincha, Jesuit haciendas, colonial period, political center, agricultural intensification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review