Cited by 162Biochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesSensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Developmental changes in the acceptance of the five basic tastes in the first year of life.

Open access
Schwartz, Camille, Issanchou, Sylvie, Nicklaus, Sophie·2009·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Taste is a major determinant of children's food preferences, but its development is incompletely known. Thus, exploring infants' acceptance of basic tastes is necessary. The first objective was to evaluate the acceptance of tastes and their developmental changes over the first year. The second objective was to compare acceptance across tastes. The third objective was to evaluate global taste reactivity (within-subject variability of acceptance across tastes). Acceptance of sweet, salty, bitter, sour and umami tastes was assessed in three groups of forty-five 3-, 6- and 12-month-old infants using observations based on ingestion and liking scored by the experimenter. For each taste, four bottles were presented (water, tastant, tastant, water). Acceptance of each taste relative to water was defined using proportional variables based on ingestion or liking. Acceptance over the first year only evolved for sweet taste (marginal decrease) and salty taste (clear increase). At each age, sweet and salty tastes were the most preferred tastes. Reactions to umami were neutral. Sour and bitter tastes were the least accepted ones but rejected only when considering liking data. Ingestion and liking were complementary to assess taste acceptance. However, congruency between these measures rose during the first year. Moreover, with increasing age, reactions were more and more contrasted across tastes. Finally, during the first year, inter-individual variability increased for all tastes except salty taste. By enhancing knowledge of the development of taste acceptance the present study contributes to understand better food behaviour in infancy, the foundation of food behaviour in adulthood.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114509990286

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Young children prefer more intensely sweet solutions than adults, and a more adult-like preference pattern appears during adolescence.

    “The most striking effect was that young children liked more intensely sweet solutions than did adults, with the more adult-like pattern emerging only during adolescence (29, 30).”

    From Sweetness and Food Preference (2012) · cites this paper as [30]

    The introduction says infants prefer sweeter solutions up to an optimal concentration, and the Discussion reports that sweet-taste preference declined between ages 11–15 and 19–25 in a longitudinal study. The paper does not establish that young children prefer more intensely sweet solutions than adults, or that an adult-like pattern emerges only during adolescence. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [45]45. Schwartz C, Chabanet C, Issanchou S, et al. (2008) Reactivity to basic tastes in 6-month-old infants: comparison of intake and Baby FACS data. In 12th European Conference on Facial Expression. Geneva: NCCR in Affective Sciences.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwartz, C., Issanchou, S., & Nicklaus, S.
Affiliations
Université de Bourgogne (FR)
Corresponding author
Issanchou, Sylvie
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2009-06-09
Volume
102
Issue
9
Pages
1375-1385
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2114455617
Cited by
162
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-06-PNRA-0028)
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
  • Conseil régional de Bourgogne-Franche-Comté
  • Symrise
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
taste acceptance, basic taste, sweet taste, salty taste, bitter taste, sour taste, umami taste, food preferences, ingestion, liking, interindividual variability, first year of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Aging, Anthropometry, Child Development, Female, Food Preferences, Humans, Infant, Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Male, Taste, Taste Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review