Cited by 898Nutritional Studies and DietStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyNutrition and Health Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relative validity of a semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire in an elderly Mediterranean population of Spain

Open access
Fernández-Ballart, Joan D., Piñol, Josep Lluís, Zazpe, Itziar, Corella, Dolores, Carrasco, Paula, Toledo, Estefanía, Perez-Bauer, Manuel, Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel, Salas-Salvadó, Jorge, Martín-Moreno, José M.·2010·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess reproducibility and relative validity of a self-administered FFQ used in the PREDIMED Study, a clinical trial for primary prevention of CVD by Mediterranean diet in a population at high cardiovascular risk. The FFQ was administered twice (FFQ1 and FFQ2) to explore reproducibility at 1 year. Four 3 d dietary records (DR) were used as reference to explore validity; participants therefore recorded their food intake over 12 d in the course of 1 year. The degree of misclassification in the FFQ was also evaluated by a contingency table of quintiles comparing the information from the FFQ2 and the DR. A total of 158 men and women (aged 55–80 years) were asked not to modify their dietary habits during the study period. Reproducibility for food groups, energy and nutrient intake, explored by the Pearson correlation coefficient ( r ) ranged 0·50–0·82, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranged from 0·63 to 0·90. The FFQ2 tended to report higher energy and nutrient intake than the DR. The validity indices of the FFQ in relation to the DR for food groups and energy and nutrient intake ranged ( r ) from 0·24 to 0·72, while the range of the ICC was between 0·40 and 0·84. With regard to food groups, 68–83 % of individuals were in the same or adjacent quintile in both methods, a figure which decreased to 55–75 % for energy and nutrient intake. We concluded that FFQ measurements had good reproducibility and a relative validity similar to those of FFQ used in other prospective studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114509993837

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bingham, 1987, The dietary assessment of individuals; methods, accuracy, new techniques and recommendations, Nutr Abstr Rev (Series A: Hum Nutr), 57, 705
  2. Moreiras, 2005, Tablas de Composición de Alimentos (Food Composition Tables)
  3. 10.1093/intjepid/31.2.474 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 898

Metadata

Authors
Fernández-Ballart, J. D., Piñol, J. L., Zazpe, I., Corella, D., Carrasco, P., Toledo, E., Perez-Bauer, M., Martínez-González, M. Á., Salas-Salvadó, J., & Martín-Moreno, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Institut Català de la Salut (ES)
  • Universitat de València (ES)
  • Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2010-01-27
Volume
103
Issue
12
Pages
1808-1816
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2140405768
Cited by
898
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 103 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 27
FWCI
29.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rovira & Virgili repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Deposito Adademico Digital Universidad De Navarra (University of Navarra) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (RD06/0045)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
food frequency questionnaire, relative validity, reproducibility, dietary assessment, Mediterranean diet, PREDIMED study, older adults, dietary records, energy intake, nutrient intake, food groups, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Aged, Diet, Diet Surveys, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Spain, Reproducibility of Results, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Diet Records, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Diet, Mediterranean

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review