Cited by 39Dietary Effects on HealthLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Improvements in LDL particle size and distribution by short-term alternate day modified fasting in obese adults

Open access
Varady, Krista A., Bhutani, Surabhi, Klempel, Monica C., Lamarche, Benoît·2011·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Alternate day modified fasting (ADMF) beneficially modulates several indicators of CHD risk, but its effects on LDL particle size have never been tested. Accordingly, we examined the effects of ADMF on LDL particle size and distribution in obese adults. Sixteen obese subjects participated in a 10-week trial with three consecutive phases: (1) 2-week control phase; (2) 4-week ADMF controlled feeding phase; (3) 4-week ADMF self-selected feeding phase. After 8 weeks of diet, body weight and waist circumference were reduced (P < 0·05) by 5·6 (sem 0·9) kg and 4·0 (sem 0·9) cm, respectively. LDL-cholesterol and TAG concentrations decreased (P < 0·05) by 25 (sem 10) % and 32 (sem 6) %, respectively. Peak LDL particle size increased (P < 0·05) from 266 (sem 1) to 268 (sem 1) Å. Additionally, the proportion of small LDL particles decreased (P < 0·05) from 13 (sem 2) % to 9 (sem 3) %, while the proportion of large LDL particles increased (P < 0·05) from 68 (sem 4) % to 76 (sem 4) % post-treatment. These findings suggest that ADMF is an effective diet strategy for increasing LDL particle size and decreasing the proportion of small, dense LDL particles in obese adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114510003788

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varady, K. A., Bhutani, S., Klempel, M. C., & Lamarche, B.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Varady, Krista A.
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2010-09-30
Volume
105
Issue
4
Pages
580-583
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2144550198
Cited by
39
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
LDL particle size, small dense LDL, obesity, weight loss, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Body Weight, Fasting, Female, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Particle Size, Patient Compliance, Triglycerides, Weight Loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review