CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 368Nutritional Studies and DietReliability and Agreement in MeasurementSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reliability, comparative validity and stability of dietary patterns derived from an FFQ in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study

Open access
Asghari, Golaleh, Rezazadeh, Arezoo, Hosseini-Esfahani, Firoozeh, Mehrabi, Yadollah, Mirmiran, Parvin, Azizi, Fereidoun·2012·British Journal of Nutrition
DOI 10.1017/s0007114511006313
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the reliability, comparative validity and stability of dietary patterns defined by factor analysis for participants of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. A total of 132 subjects, aged ≥ 20 years, completed a 168-item FFQ (FFQ1, FFQ2) twice, with a 14-month interval. Over this duration, twelve dietary recalls (DR) were collected each month. To assess the stability of the FFQ, participants completed the third FFQ (FFQ3) after 8 years. Following these, two dietary patterns--the 'Iranian Traditional' and the 'Western'--were derived from FFQ1 and FFQ2 and the mean of DR (mDR); and three dietary patterns were identified from FFQ3: the 'Iranian Traditional', the 'Western' and the 'Combined'. The reliability correlations between factor scores of the two FFQ were 0·72 for the Iranian Traditional and 0·80 for the Western pattern; corrected month-to-month variations of DR correlations between the FFQ2 and mDR were 0·48 for the first and 0·75 for the second pattern. The 95 % limits of agreement for the difference between factor scores obtained from FFQ2 and mDR lay between -1·58 and +1·58 for the Iranian Traditional and between -1·33 and +1·33 for the Western pattern. The intra-class correlations between FFQ2 and FFQ3 were -0·09 (P = 0·653) and 0·49 (P <0·001) for the 'Iranian Traditional' and the 'Western', respectively. These data indicate reasonable reliability and validity of the dietary patterns defined by factor analysis. Although the Western pattern was found to be fairly stable, the Iranian Traditional pattern was mostly unstable over the 8 years of the study period.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114511006313

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Kimiagar, 1995, National Food Consumption Survey
  2. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195122978.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ghafarpour, 1999, The Manual for Household Measures, Cooking Yields Factors and Edible Portion of Food
  4. Azar, 1980, Food Composition Table of Iran

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 368

Related

Metadata

Authors
Asghari, G., Rezazadeh, A., Hosseini-Esfahani, F., Mehrabi, Y., Mirmiran, P., & Azizi, F.
Affiliations
  • Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences (IR)
  • Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Mirmiran, Parvin
ORCID
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2012-01-17
Volume
108
Issue
6
Pages
1109-1117
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
DOI
10.1017/s0007114511006313
OpenAlex
W1976112075
Cited by
368
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified)
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
dietary habits, food frequency questionnaire, questionnaire reliability, questionnaire validity, dietary recall, Western diet, factor analysis, Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Diet, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Feeding Behavior, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Iran, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Urban Health, Cohort Studies, Nutrition Assessment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review