The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 54 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS)
Open accessAbstract
An experiment was conducted to compare values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for four animal proteins and four plant proteins with values calculated as recommended for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS), but determined in pigs instead of in rats. Values for standardised total tract digestibility (STTD) of crude protein (CP) and standardised ileal digestibility (SID) of amino acids (AA) were calculated for whey protein isolate (WPI), whey protein concentrate (WPC), milk protein concentrate (MPC), skimmed milk powder (SMP), pea protein concentrate (PPC), soya protein isolate (SPI), soya flour and whole-grain wheat. The PDCAAS-like values were calculated using the STTD of CP to estimate AA digestibility and values for DIAAS were calculated from values for SID of AA. Results indicated that values for SID of most indispensable AA in WPI, WPC and MPC were greater (P<0·05) than for SMP, PPC, SPI, soya flour and wheat. With the exception of arginine and tryptophan, the SID of all indispensable AA in SPI was greater (P<0·05) than in soya flour, and with the exception of threonine, the SID of all indispensable AA in wheat was less (P<0·05) than in all other ingredients. If the same scoring pattern for children between 6 and 36 months was used to calculate PDCAAS-like values and DIAAS, PDCAAS-like values were greater (P<0·05) than DIAAS values for SMP, PPC, SPI, soya flour and wheat indicating that PDCAAS-like values estimated in pigs may overestimate the quality of these proteins.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
41 Own result · 40 Not checked yet · 18 Own interpretation · 9 No basis given · 4 Own method · accuracy not yet measured
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“results indicated that WPC had greater PDCAAS than SMP, SPI and soya protein concentrate (7,19)”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] source
- Could not verifycites [19] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The section on apparent ileal and faecal digestibility discusses rat nitrogen-digestibility data, but does not compare PDCAAS among the named proteins (page unavailable). Searches for PDCAAS and whey protein concentrate found no passage addressing the claimed ranking. (LLM, conf=0.75)
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With the exception of arginine and tryptophan, the SID of all indispensable AA in SPI was greater (P < 0•05) than in soya flour, and with the exception of threonine, the SID of all indispensable AA in wheat was less (P < 0•05) than in all other ingredients.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Results indicated that values for SID of most indispensable AA in WPI, WPC and MPC were greater (P < 0•05) than for SMP, PPC, SPI, soya flour and wheat.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“However, the SID of most AA was greater (P < 0•05) in WPI, WPC and MPC than in SMP, PPC, soya flour and wheat, but for SPI, many AA had SID values that were not different from those in WPI, WPC and MPC.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The SID of isoleucine, cysteine and serine was less (P < 0•05) in MPC than in WPI and WPC, and the SID of valine and glutamic acid was less (P < 0•05) in MPC than in WPI, but for all other AA, no differences among MPC, WPI and WPC were observed.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With the exception of arginine, tryptophan, alanine and glycine, the SID of all AA was greater (P < 0•05) in SPI than in soya flour.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The SID of isoleucine, cysteine and serine was less (P < 0•05) in MPC than in WPI and WPC, and the SID of valine and glutamic acid was less (P < 0•05) in MPC than in WPI, but for all other AA, no differences among MPC, WPI and WPC were observed.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With the exception of tyrosine, the SID of all AA was not different between WPI and WPC (Table 4).”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the same scoring pattern for children between 6 and 36 months was used to calculate PDCAAS-like values and DIAAS, PDCAAS-like values were greater (P < 0•05) than DIAAS values for SMP, PPC, SPI, soya flour and wheat indicating that PDCAAS-like values estimated in pigs”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“If PDCAAS-like values were calculated according to the same scoring pattern as DIAAS (8) , PDCAAS-like values for SMP, PPC, SPI, soya flour and wheat were greater (P < 0•05) than values for DIAAS, whereas the PDCAAS-like value for WPI was less (P < 0•05) than the DIAAS for WPI.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“with the exception of threonine, the SID of all indispensable AA in wheat was less (P < 0•05) than in all other ingredients.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The SID of isoleucine, cysteine and serine was less (P < 0•05) in MPC than in WPI and WPC, and the SID of valine and glutamic acid was less (P < 0•05) in MPC than in WPI, but for all other AA, no differences among MPC, WPI and WPC were observed.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 14
- It may state two separate claims as one. 25
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The concentration of CP in ingredients ranged from 11•67 to 92•66 %.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“If PDCAAS-like values calculated according to FAO/WHO (1) were truncated as recommended, values for WPC, MPC, SMP were less (P < 0•05) than values for DIAAS, whereas PDCAASlike values for PPC, SPI, soya flour and wheat were greater (P < 0•05) than for DIAAS (Table 6).”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, if PDCAAS-like values were not truncated, the PDCAAS-like value for WPC was not different from DIAAS, but PDCAAS-like values for MPC and SMP were greater (P < 0•05) than DIAAS.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, if PDCAAS-like values were calculated using the original scoring patterns (1) , either truncated or not truncated, the first-limiting AA for whey proteins was the aromatic AA and threonine was first limiting in MPC and the sulfur AA were first limiting in SMP and SPI.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The observation that both lysine and tryptophan in wheat had a lower SID value than threonine”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first-limiting AA for DIAAS calculated for infants were the aromatic AA for the whey proteins, tryptophan for MPC and PPC, threonine for SMP, the sulfur AA for SPI, leucine for soya flour and lysine for wheat.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the first-limiting AA in PPC was tryptophan, whereas lysine was first limiting in soya flour and wheat.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Calculated PDCAAS-like values for infants were greater (P < 0•05) than values for DIAAS for SMP, PPC, SPI and wheat, whereas the value for DIAAS for WPI tended (P = 0•062) to be greater than the PDCAAS-like value (Table 7).”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For values for DIAAS, the first-limiting AA in WPI and WPC was histidine, but for MPC, SMP, PPC, SPI and soya flour, the sulfur AA were first limiting, and lysine was first liming in wheat.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“PPC and wheat tested in this experiment fall into this category.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For children older than 3 years, adolescents and adults, PDCAAS-like values for SMP, PPC and SPI were greater (P < 0•05) than DIAAS, and the PDCAAS-like value for soya flour tended (P = 0•053) to be”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“If PDCAAS-like values were calculated according to the same scoring pattern as DIAAS (8) , PDCAAS-like values for SMP, PPC, SPI, soya flour and wheat were greater (P < 0•05) than values for DIAAS, whereas the PDCAAS-like value for WPI was less (P < 0•05) than the DIAAS for WPI.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first-limiting AA for PDCAAS-like values calculated for infants in SMP was tryptophan, but for all other ingredients, the first-limiting AA in the calculation of DIAAS was also first limiting for PDCAAS-like values.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“with lysine being first limiting in wheat, histidine being first limiting in the whey proteins and the sulfur AA being first limiting in the whole milk proteins and the soya and pea proteins.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“differences in the ileal digestibility among individual AA in all proteins exist with the digestibility of threonine being the least for most proteins.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“PDCAAS-like values calculated from the total tract digestibility of CP in pigs and DIAAS values for dairy proteins are greater than for proteins obtained from soyabeans, peas or wheat.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In contrast, PDCAAS values according to the original definition are determined in rats (1) .”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“It was also recently concluded that PDCAAS generally underestimates the value of high-quality proteins and overestimates the value of low-quality proteins (7) .”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“To calculate DIAAS, it is necessary to determine the digestibility of individual AA at the end of the small intestine (the ileum), and the pig has been recognised as an appropriate model for estimating CP and AA digestibility in foods for humans (8)(9)(10) .”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“It is, therefore, important that the comparison is done within the same animal and because the pig has been recommended as the preferred animal model to calculate DIAAS values (8) , we chose to use the pig to also calculate PDCAAS-like values in this study.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites (8)(9)(10)
- Not checked yetcites [8] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With nine replicates we expected to be able to detect differences in SID values among ingredients of 2•5-4 percentage units (depending on the AA).”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Methods
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All pigs remained healthy throughout the experiment and readily consumed their diets.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It is, however, recognised that digestibility of AA is most correctly determined at the end of the small intestine (the ileum), because AA are absorbed only from the small intestine and because hindgut fermentation can affect faecal AA excretion (2) .”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2]
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“To avoid the flaws of the PDCAAS procedure, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (8) now recommends an AA evaluation procedure called digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS).”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“To calculate DIAAS, it is necessary to determine the digestibility of individual AA at the end of the small intestine (the ileum), and the pig has been recognised as an appropriate model for estimating CP and AA digestibility in foods for humans (8)(9)(10) .”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Samples were analysed in duplicate, but analyses were repeated if the analysed values were >5 % apart.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Methods
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“which indicates that mucin in humans also may have a high concentration of threonine (9,10)”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Discussion
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“diet-specific losses are debited against the ingredients in the calculations of SID values.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Diet-specific endogenous losses may occur in addition to basal endogenous losses.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the present experiment we attempted to do that, but it is acknowledged that all proteins were fed as raw ingredients without the processing that these ingredients most often go through before consumption by humans.If processing changes the digestibility of the protein, results may be different.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“may indicate that the wheat used in this experiment had been heat damaged during drying or grinding.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Discussion
hedgedconditionalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“the cut-off values for protein quality assessments that were proposed were arbitrarily chosen and not based on documented research (8)”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, the composition and digestibility of both of these types of proteins differ (4,19) , and both plant and animal proteins, therefore, need to be evaluated.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“criticism related to the scoring patterns that were originally suggested (1) can be easily overcome by adopting different scoring patterns.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“in a later report from WHO/FAO, scoring patterns for several age groups of children, teenagers and adults were suggested (28)”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“the problems associated with truncation can also be easily corrected by using untruncated values (26)”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This inaccuracy will have greater impact on evaluation of proteins used in developing countries than in developed countries, because foods typically consumed in many developing countries have lower digestibility of CP than food typically consumed in developed countries (29)”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
No published DIAAS values for these proteins had been determined in pigs, and it was unknown how DIAAS values determined in pigs compare with PDCAAS-like values determined in pigs.
“To our knowledge, there are no published values for DIAAS for these proteins that have been determined in pigs and it is not known how values for DIAAS determined in pigs compare with PDCAAS-like values determined in pigs.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Amino acid digestibility in growing castrated male pigs is representative of values obtained in both male and female humans of all ages.
“Other limitations of the experiment include the assumption that AA digestibility in growing castrated male pigs are representative of values obtained in both male and female humans of all ages.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Mucin protein is resistant to protease digestion and is included in the endogenous protein fraction that reaches the distal ileum in pigs without being hydrolysed.
“Mucin protein is resistant to protease digestion, and therefore is included in the endogenous protein fraction that reaches the distal end of the ileum in pigs without being hydrolysed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
N exchange in the hindgut does not contribute to the amino acid balance in humans and monogastric animals, and amino acids are absorbed only in the small intestine.
“because N exchange in the hindgut does not contribute to the AA balance in humans and monogastric animals and because AA are absorbed only in the small intestine”
The paper relies on this without support.
PPC and wheat are not expected to be used to a great extent in the feeding of infants.
“these proteins are not expected to be used to a great extent in the feeding of infants.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Endogenous losses are really lost from the body.
“because endogenous losses are really lost from the body”
The paper relies on this without support.
Diet-specific endogenous losses may occur in addition to basal endogenous losses.
“In addition to the basal endogenous losses, diet-specific endogenous losses may also occur”
The paper relies on this without support.
The major protein in SMP is casein, which has a low concentration of cysteine.
“The major protein in SMP is casein, which has a low concentration of cysteine”
The paper relies on this without support.
For proteins that are not heat damaged, threonine usually has a lower SID value than lysine.
“which is usually the case for proteins that are not heat damaged.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Discussion
“However, if the original scoring pattern for PDCAAS was used, the predicted first-limiting AA were different for all proteins except SMP, PPC and wheat”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Discussion
“| PPC | 75 a (Trp) | 75 a (Trp) | 71 b (SAA) | 62 c (SAA) | 0•6 | <0•0001 | | SPI | 93 a (SAA) | 93 a (SAA) | 86 b (SAA) | 84 c (SAA) | 0•5 | <0•0001 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Abstract
“with the exception of threonine, the SID of all indispensable AA in wheat was less (P < 0•05) than in all other ingredients.”
§ Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) > Results
“The SID of all indispensable AA and of alanine and tyrosine was less (P < 0•05) in wheat than in all other ingredients.”
Citations
Cites
Stein, H. H., Sève, B., Fuller, M. F., Moughan, P. J., & de Lange, C. F. M. (2007) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2005-742 · Cited by 796
Self-citationThe Protein Digestibility–Corrected Amino Acid Score
Schaafsma, G. (2000) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/130.7.1865s · Cited by 537 · cited 3×
“The amount and quality of protein consumed throughout the world varies depending on protein availability, AA composition of proteins and digestibility of AA((16)).”
BackgroundMethodFao, J., Intake, W. E. C. O. E., & Requirements, S. P. (1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 524
Effects of antinutritional factors on protein digestibility and amino acid availability in foods
Gilani, G. S., Cockell, K. A., & Sepehr, E. (2005) · Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL · doi:10.1093/jaoac/88.3.967 · Cited by 483
Rutherfurd, S. M., Fanning, A. C., Miller, B. J., & Moughan, P. J. (2015) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.114.195438 · Cited by 433
Boye, J., Wijesinha-Bettoni, R., & Burlingame, B. (2012) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114512002309 · Cited by 421 · cited 5×
“In addition to the lack of digestibility values for individual AA, a major limitation of the PDCAAS system is that all scores are truncated to 100% with the rationale that any amount of AA beyond the requirement pattern confers no additional benefit to the individual consuming the protein((8,16,26,27)).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDigestibility of amino acids in swine: Results and their practical applications. A review
Sauer, W. C., & Ozimek, L. (1986) · Livestock Production Science · doi:10.1016/0301-6226(86)90076-x · Cited by 325
Technical note: a technique for inserting a T-cannula into the distal ileum of pregnant sows.
Stein, H. H., Shipley, C. F., & Easter, R. A. (1998) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1998.7651433x · Cited by 319 · cited 3×
“Nine growing barrows (initial body weight: 26·25 (SD 1·48) kg) were equipped with a T-cannula in the distal ileum using procedures adapted from Stein et al.((13)).”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationDietary protein quality and malnutrition in Africa
Schönfeldt, H. C., & Hall, N. (2012) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114512002553 · Cited by 245
Sarwar, G. (1997) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/127.5.758 · Cited by 205
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 2007, Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International
- 2012, Nutrient Requirements of Swine
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 477
Khayour, M., Benmhimdane, A., Calvez, J., Saeid, N., Khodorova, N., Belghiti, H., Hamdouchi, A. E., Kari, K. E., Owino, V. O., Tomé, D., et al. (2022) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.tjnut.2022.11.015 · Cited by 14
Dridi, C., Millette, M., Aguilar‐Uscanga, B. R., Salmieri, S., Allahdad, Z., & Lacroix, M. (2023) · Food and Bioprocess Technology · doi:10.1007/s11947-023-03043-y · Cited by 14
Mechanically activated hydrolysis of plant-derived proteins in food industry
Dome, K., Bychkov, A., Бычкова, Е. С., Akimenko, Z., Chernonosov, A. А., Kalambet, Y., & Ломовский, О. И. (2019) · Foods and raw materials · doi:10.21603/2308-4057-2019-2-255-263 · Cited by 14
Dairy Alternatives – Cheese, Yogurt, Butter, and Ice Cream
McClements, D. J., & Großmann, L. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96764-2_9 · Cited by 13
Komatsu, Y., Wada, Y., Shibasaki, T., Kitamura, Y., Ehara, T., Nakamura, H., & Miyaji, K. (2024) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114524001260 · Cited by 13
Oh, J., Park, N., & Kim, B. G. (2025) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani15050650 · Cited by 13
Katz-Rosene, R. M. (2020) · Canadian Food Studies / La Revue canadienne des études sur l alimentation · doi:10.15353/cfs-rcea.v7i2.413 · Cited by 13
Compositional and Functional Considerations for Bovine-, Caprine- and Plant-Based Infant Formulas
Byrne, M. E., O’Mahony, J. A., & O’Callaghan, T. F. (2021) · Dairy · doi:10.3390/dairy2040054 · Cited by 13
Paulussen, K. J. M., Askow, A. T., Deutz, M. T., McKenna, C. F., Garvey, S. M., Guice, J. L., Kesler, R. M., Barnes, T. M., Tinker, K. M., Paluska, S. A., et al. (2024) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.03.009 · Cited by 12
Boeck, T., Nyhan, L., Zannini, E., & Arendt, E. K. (2024) · Food & Function · doi:10.1039/d4fo04103h · Cited by 12
Muniyappan, M., Lee, Y., & Kim, I. H. (2022) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2022.105016 · Cited by 12
van der Wielen, N., de Vries, S., Gerrits, W. J. J., Lammers-Jannink, K., Moughan, P. J., Mensink, M., & Hendriks, W. H. (2023) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.01.038 · Cited by 12
Do, S., Koutsos, E. A., Utterback, P. L., Parsons, C. M. M., de Godoy, M. R. C., & Swanson, K. S. (2021) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1093/jas/skab124 · Cited by 12
Novel soft food gels using beta-lactoglobulin via enzymatic crosslinking as agar gel alternatives
Liu, H., Nardin, C., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.110213 · Cited by 11
Edible insects: protein composition, digestibility, and biofunctionalities
Nolan, P. J., Mahmoud, A. E., Kavle, R. R., Carne, A., Bekhit, A. E. A., & Agyei, D. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95052-7.00020-0 · Cited by 10
Tessier, R., Calvez, J., & Gaudichon, C. (2021) · Cahiers de Nutrition et de Diététique · doi:10.1016/j.cnd.2021.02.002 · Cited by 11
Membrane filtration processing of infant milk formula alters protein digestion in young pigs
Chen, Y., Rooney, H. B., Dold, C. A., Bavaro, S. L., Tobin, J. T., Callanan, M. J., Brodkorb, A., Lawlor, P. G., & Giblin, L. (2023) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112577 · Cited by 11
Zhao, Y., Wu, X., Zhou, Z., Du, G., Chen, J. S., & Liu, X. (2025) · Food Bioscience · doi:10.1016/j.fbio.2025.106045 · Cited by 10
Pulse protein quality and derived bioactive peptides
Nosworthy, M. G., Yu, B., Zaharia, L. I., Medina, G., & Patterson, N. A. (2025) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1429225 · Cited by 10
Tukiainen, K., Kyttä, V., Gómez-Gallego, C., Kolehmainen, M., Pajari, A., Tuomisto, H. L., Saarinen, M., & Kårlund, A. (2025) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-025-02451-w · Cited by 10
Magdum, A. B., Shinde, K. V., Jadhav, N. K., Jagtap, M., Patil, S. A., & Nimbalkar, M. S. (2026) · European Food Research and Technology · doi:10.1007/s00217-025-04933-5 · Cited by 10
Koshinaka, K., Honda, A., Iizumi, R., Miyazawa, Y., Kawanaka, K., & Satô, A. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13062042 · Cited by 10
Protein Preparations as Ingredients for the Enrichment of Non-Fermented Milks
Kiełczewska, K., Dąbrowska, A. Z., Bielecka, M. M., Dec, B., Baranowska, M., Ziajka, J., Zhennai, Y., & Żulewska, J. (2022) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods11131817 · Cited by 10
Zangirolami, M. D. S., Moreira, T. F. M., Leimann, F. V., Valderrama, P., & Março, P. H. (2022) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109290 · Cited by 10
Khalesi, M., Cermeño, M., & Fitzgerald, R. J. (2023) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2023.105543 · Cited by 10
The in vivo and in vitro protein quality of three hemp protein sources
Nosworthy, M. G., Franczyk, A. J., Neufeld, J., & House, J. D. (2023) · Food Science & Nutrition · doi:10.1002/fsn3.3652 · Cited by 10
Protein quality in ready‐to‐use supplementary foods for moderate wasting
Roediger, R., Stein, H. H., Callaghan‐Gillespie, M., Blackman, J. K., Kohlmann, K., Maleta, K. M., & MANARY, M. J. (2020) · Maternal and Child Nutrition · doi:10.1111/mcn.13019 · Cited by 10
Self-citationHsu, C., Utterback, P. L., Parsons, C. M. M., Marx, F. R., Guldenpfennig, R., & de Godoy, M. R. C. (2023) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1093/jas/skad289 · Cited by 10
O’Leary, F., Grech, A. L., Sui, Z., Cheng, H., Rangan, A., & Hirani, V. (2019) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/s41430-019-0478-x · Cited by 10
Blanco‐Doval, A., Sousa, R., Barrón, L. J. R., Portmann, R., Egger, L., & Aldai, N. (2024) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2024-24807 · Cited by 9
Mittal, A., Choudhary, N., Kumari, A., Yadav, K., Maras, J. S., Sarin, S. K., & Sharma, S. (2025) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2025.01.022 · Cited by 9
Messina, V., Guest, N. S., Duncan, A. M., Mangels, A. R., Norris, J., Ruscigno, M., Glenn, A. J., Wolfram, T., Marinangeli, C. P. F., & Messina, M. J. (2025) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2025.1641234 · Cited by 9
Consideration of utilizable amino acid content in the context of dietary protein quality assessment
Adhikari, S., de Boer, I. J. M., van Hal, O., & Huppertz, T. (2023) · Sustainable Food Proteins · doi:10.1002/sfp2.1020 · Cited by 9
Habumugisha, T., Måren, I. E., Matsiko, E., Kaiser, M., Dierkes, J., & Engebretsen, I. M. S. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-19038-z · Cited by 9
Dietary risk factors of physical growth of Filipino school-aged children
Angeles‐Agdeppa, I., Nakamura, T., Sugita, M., Toledo, M. B., Sampaga, P. C., & Zamora, J. A. T. (2022) · Food & Nutrition Research · doi:10.29219/fnr.v66.7873 · Cited by 8
Barnes, T. M., Deutz, M. T., Zupančič, Ž., Askow, A. T., Moore, D. R., & Burd, N. A. (2023) · Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism · doi:10.1139/apnm-2022-0373 · Cited by 8
Effect of thermal processing on the digestion of plant proteins
Mukhtar, K., Nabi, B. G., Ahmed, W., Suleman, R., & Aadil, R. M. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95052-7.00010-8 · Cited by 8
Chauhan, S., Joshi, T., Adhikari, U., Sinha, A., Deepa, P. R., & Sharma, P. K. (2024) · Food and Humanity · doi:10.1016/j.foohum.2024.100295 · Cited by 8
Hsu, C., Utterback, P. L., Parsons, C. M. M., Davenport, G. M., Rokey, G. J., & de Godoy, M. R. C. (2024) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.115999 · Cited by 8
Giezenaar, C., Montoya, C. A., Kreutz, K., Hodgkinson, S. M., Roy, N. C., Mace, L. J., Fraser, K., Fernstrom, J. D., McNabb, W. C., & Moughan, P. J. (2024) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.07.010 · Cited by 8
Korzepa, M., Marshall, R. N., Rogers, L. M., Belfield, A. E., Quinlan, J. I., Huang, Y., Gritsas, A., Churchward‐Venne, T. A., Glover, E. I., van Loon, L. J. C., et al. (2025) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-025-03605-0 · Cited by 8
Safety of Beta‐lactoglobulin as a Novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283
EFSA Panel on Nutrition, N. F. A. F. A. (., Turck, D., Bohn, T., Castenmiller, J. J. M., Henauw, S. D., Hirsch‐Ernst, K. I., Maciuk, A., Mangelsdorf, I., McArdle, H. J., Naska, A., et al. (2022) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7204 · Cited by 8
Net protein contribution from an intensive Australian pork supply chain
van Barneveld, R. J., Hewitt, R. J. E., & D’Souza, D. N. (2023) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an23057 · Cited by 8
Safety evaluation of whey derived beta-lactoglobulin, Lacprodan® BLG
Dybdahl, M., Selesko, D. B., & Mikkelsen, U. R. (2021) · Toxicology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.03.012 · Cited by 8
Stein, H. H. (2024) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2024.1434430 · Cited by 7
Self-citationDecolourised barley and rice protein isolate – Enhanced techno-functional and sensory properties
Ahern, N., Boeck, T., Ressa, A., Nyhan, L., Arendt, E. K., Sanchez, R., O’Riordan, P., Münch, S., & Sahin, A. W. (2025) · Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2025.103999 · Cited by 7
Development and evaluation of an alternative protein-rich legume-based snack
Mnayer, D., & Joubrane, K. (2025) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e43412 · Cited by 7
Magwere, A. A., Logan, A., Gamlath, S., Gambetta, J. M., Kukuljan, S., & Keast, R. (2025) · Beverages · doi:10.3390/beverages11060171 · Cited by 7
Gómez-Marín, C., Fanelli, N. S., Miralles, B., Stein, H. H., & Recio, I. (2026) · Current Research in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.crfs.2026.101311 · Cited by 7
Self-citationSachdev, N., Goomer, S., Singh, L. R. K., & Chowhan, R. K. (2023) · Food Science and Technology International · doi:10.1177/10820132231159819 · Cited by 7
Perspective: Assuring the Quality of Protein in Infant Formula
Wallingford, J. C. (2023) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.advnut.2023.04.008 · Cited by 7
Ashtary‐Larky, D. (2025) · Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.nut.2025.112742 · Cited by 7
Dhankhar, J. (2023) · Journal of Microbiology Biotechnology and Food Sciences · doi:10.55251/jmbfs.9543 · Cited by 7
Emerging food trends: plant-based food revolution
Cruz, R. M. S., & Boukid, F. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-15516-1.00012-8 · Cited by 7
Duval, A., Sayd, T., Aubry, L., Ferreira, C., Ferraro, V., & Santé-Lhoutellier, V. (2020) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods9101499 · Cited by 7
The Evaluation of Yeast Protein Quality as a New and Sustainable Source of Dietary Protein
Qiao, K., Zhou, X., Sun, B., Liang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.5c06807 · Cited by 6
Qin, Y., Pillidge, C. J., Harrison, B., Chen, X. D., Chen, J., & Adhikari, B. (2025) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2025.112150 · Cited by 6
Fanelli, N. S., Martins, J. C. F. R., & Stein, H. H. (2024) · Journal of Nutritional Science · doi:10.1017/jns.2024.71 · Cited by 6
Self-citationPre-clinical evidence for plant and insect proteins in supporting growth and bone development
Becker, G., Janssen, J. N., Kalev‐Altman, R., Meilich, D., Shitrit-Tovli, A., Penn, S., Reifen, R. M., & Ornan, E. M. (2024) · Future Foods · doi:10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100504 · Cited by 6
Mioto, J. C., Utterback, P. L., Parsons, C. M., Madison, S. D., Adolphe, J. L., & de Godoy, M. R. C. (2025) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1093/jas/skaf082 · Cited by 6
Nutritional and Health Aspects
McClements, D. J., & Großmann, L. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96764-2_5 · Cited by 6
Kozior, M., Davies, R. W., Amigo‐Benavent, M., Fealy, C. E., & Jakeman, P. M. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15194211 · Cited by 6
Schlepphorst, K. I., Clark, B. E., Pope, L., Donahue, R., & Belarmino, E. H. (2023) · Nutrition Bulletin · doi:10.1111/nbu.12628 · Cited by 6
Warren, D. C., Soule, L., Taylor, K., Skinner, R. C., Ku, K., Matak, K. E., Benedito, V. A., & Tou, J. C. L. (2020) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/1750-3841.15321 · Cited by 6
Lanza, M., Scuderi, S. A., Capra, A. P., Casili, G., Filippone, A., Campolo, M., Cuzzocrea, S., Esposito, E., & Paterniti, I. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28957-7 · Cited by 6
Tomé, D. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821848-8.00028-7 · Cited by 6
Cai, H., Qin, X., Lai, M., Geng, X., Ma, H., Wu, X., Qian, W., Wang, M., Ren, X., Wang, R., et al. (2025) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.05.006 · Cited by 5
Cui, H., Hodgkinson, S. M., Stroebinger, N., Roy, D., Li, S., Guo, Q., & Ye, A. (2025) · Food & Function · doi:10.1039/d5fo03804a · Cited by 5
Ely, I. A., Paul, M., Wall, J. J. S., Cox, J., Larsen, M. S., Scaife, P. J., Lund, J. N., Breen, L., Wilkinson, D. J., Smith, K., et al. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17213410 · Cited by 5
Exploring the pros and cons of plant-based egg alternatives – A review
Zahir, A., & Akhter, S. (2025) · NFS Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nfs.2025.100241 · Cited by 5
Elahikhah, M., Haidari, F., Khalesi, S., Shahbazian, H. B., Mohammadshahi, M., & Aghamohammadi, V. (2024) · BMC Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s40795-024-00879-1 · Cited by 5
Yang, H., Hu, J. B., Wei, T., Zhang, J., Ten, X., Xia, Q., Huang, X., & Fan, G. (2024) · LWT · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2024.117252 · Cited by 5
Naeem, M., Rahim, M. A., Nisa, M. U., Khalid, K., Ahmad, N., Khalid, N., Sarwar, M., & Awuchi, C. G. (2023) · Cogent Food & Agriculture · doi:10.1080/23311932.2023.2258800 · Cited by 5
Dold, C. A., Bavaro, S. L., Chen, Y., Callanan, M. J., Kennedy, D., Cassidy, J., Tobin, J. T., Sahin, A. W., Lawlor, P. G., Brodkorb, A., et al. (2024) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114343 · Cited by 5
Oriolowo, O. B., Abubakar, D. S., Bidda, R. D., & Masa’udu, S. (2021) · Acta Entomology and Zoology · doi:10.33545/27080013.2021.v2.i1a.26 · Cited by 5
Steering protein fermentation by adding fibres in pig diets
Noorman, L., Bekebrede, A. F., de Vries, S., Kies, A. K., & Gerrits, W. J. J. (2025) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2025.101615 · Cited by 4
Çelik, M. N., Karademir, E., & Gürbüz, M. (2025) · Nutrition Research · doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2025.11.007 · Cited by 4
Wongsasulak, S., Nitiwuttithorn, C., Vongsawasdi, P., Hongsthong, A., & Yongsawatdigul, J. (2025) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2025.107110 · Cited by 4
Scarpim, L. B., & Pacheco, L. G. (2026) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani16020228 · Cited by 4
Soh, B. X. P., Vignes, M., Smith, N. W., von Hurst, P. R., & McNabb, W. C. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17111806 · Cited by 4
High Protein Foods: A Comparison of Animal Origin vs Plant Origin
Iqbal, S. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-91206-2_1 · Cited by 4
Ballesteros-Torres, J. M., Escalante‐Aburto, A., Villarreal-Arce, M. E., & Caballero-Prado, C. J. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16020321 · Cited by 4
Nutritional properties: protein quality assessment parameters and methods
Sá, A. G. A., & House, J. D. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-91721-6.00011-6 · Cited by 4
Noorman, L., van der Hee, B., Gerrits, W. J. J., Lammers-Jannink, K., Kies, A. K., van der Wielen, N., Tretola, M., Hooiveld, G. J. E. J., & de Vries, S. (2024) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.10.029 · Cited by 4
Ahmed, A., Afzaal, M., Ali, S. W., Muzammil, H. S., Masood, A., Saleem, M. A., Saeed, F., Hussain, M., Rasheed, A., & Jbawi, E. M. A. (2022) · International Journal of Food Properties · doi:10.1080/10942912.2022.2120495 · Cited by 4
RetractedDraijer, N., del Rio, A. R., Lie-Piang, A., Janssen, A. E. M., & Boom, R. M. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137864 · Cited by 4
Baker, R. D., & Baker, S. S. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-67293-1.00085-2 · Cited by 4
Health Effects of Fermented Milks
Cakebread, J. A. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818766-1.00203-8 · Cited by 4
Pointke, M., & Pawelzik, E. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-16017-2.00013-9 · Cited by 3
Dairy Foods: A Matrix for Human Health and Precision Nutrition—Introduction
Lewis, G. (2025) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2024-25185 · Cited by 3
Sex-based differences in in vitro digestibility of milk and oat drink, and powder counterparts
Mashiah, L., Beck, E., Levi, C. S., & Lesmes, U. (2025) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2025.116610 · Cited by 3
Liu, Y., Zhang, Z., Mu, G., & Zhu, X. (2025) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2025.2528727 · Cited by 3
Self-citationCormack, O., Brameld, J. M., L’Hocine, L., & Bozkurt, H. (2025) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2025.2568600 · Cited by 3
Dincturk, H. C., Gundogan, R., Karaça, A. C., & Çapanoğlu, E. (2026) · Sustainable Food Proteins · doi:10.1002/sfp2.70048 · Cited by 3
Ressa, A., Nyhan, L., Sanchez, R., Lombardi, D. N., O’Riordan, P., & Arendt, E. K. (2026) · Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2026.104482 · Cited by 3
Kanter, M. M., Aaron, S., Austad, S. N., Brown, A. W., Burd, N. A., Campbell, W. W., Cope, M. B., Davis, T. A., Erdman, J. W., Freitas, M., et al. (2026) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2026.2658728 · Cited by 3
Self-citationSivakumar, C., Nadimi, M., & Paliwal, J. (2026) · Future Foods · doi:10.1016/j.fufo.2026.101049 · Cited by 3
Brishti, F. H., Mzek, T., Saari, N., Rifna, E. J., Dwivedi, M., Kaur, K., & Kaur, P. (2023) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119866923.ch9 · Cited by 3
TOPLU BESLENME HİZMETİNDE DİYETİSYEN FAKTÖRÜ: MENÜ KALİTESİ ÜZERİNE PİLOT BİR ÇALIŞMA
Gürbüz, M., & Karademir, E. (2025) · Niğde Tıp Dergisi · doi:10.70846/nigdetip.1603913 · Cited by 3
Bailey, H. M., Berg, E. P., & Stein, H. H. (2019) · Energy and protein metabolism and nutrition · doi:10.3920/978-90-8686-891-9_130 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mathai, J. K., Liu, Y., & Stein, H. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stein, Hans H.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2017-02-28
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 490-499
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W2604266670
- Semantic Scholar
- 8cec1bacdf8ad12cc80718b81c44a28e8f55d197
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 57 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 24.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Nutrient Composition and Product Development
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Keywords
- DIAAS, PDCAAS, protein quality, whey protein isolate, whey protein concentrate, milk protein concentrate, skim milk powder, pea protein concentrate, soy protein isolate, soybean flour, whole wheat, plant proteins, milk protein, pigs, children aged 6 to 36 months
- MeSH terms
- Vegetable Products, Whey Proteins, Amino Acids, Essential, Animals, Child, Preschool, Diet, Dietary Proteins, Digestion, Humans, Ileum, Infant, Male, Milk Proteins, Plant Proteins, Plants, Edible, Seeds, Glycine max, Swine, Triticum, Pisum sativum, Soybean Proteins, Gastrointestinal Tract
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
