Association of diet quality during pregnancy with maternal glucose metabolism in Chinese women
Open accessAbstract
Overall diet quality during pregnancy has played an important role on maternal glucose metabolism. However, evidence based on the adherence to the dietary guideline is limited, especially for Asian populations. We aimed to examine the association between adherence to the Chinese dietary guideline measured by the Diet Balance Index for Pregnancy (DBI-P) and maternal glucose metabolism, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) status, fasting and 2-h plasma glucose. Data were obtained from the baseline survey of the Yuexiu birth cohort. We recruited 942 pregnant women at 20–28 weeks of gestation in 2017–2018. Dietary intakes during the past month were collected using a validated semi-quantitative FFQ. The scores of DBI-P were calculated to assess dietary quality. Lower absolute values of the scores indicate higher adherence to the Chinese dietary guidelines. All participants underwent a 75 g of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Multiple linear regression and logistic regression were conducted. The Benjamini–Hochberg method was used to adjust multiple comparisons across DBI-P food components. The value of high bound score indicator, reflecting excessive total food intake, was positively associated with OGTT-2h glucose levels (β= 0·037,P= 0·029). After adjustment for multiple comparisons, the score of animal food intake was positively associated with OGTT-2 h glucose levels (β= 0·045,P= 0·045) and risk of GDM (OR = 1·105,P= 0·030). In conclusion, excessive total food intake was associated with higher postprandial glucose in pregnant women. Lower compliance with the dietary guideline for animal food was associated with both higher postprandial glucose and increased risk of GDM during pregnancy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nutritional data may be influenced by recall bias, and dietary intake assessment can be affected.
“Nutritional data may be influenced by the recall bias, and the dietary intake assessment can be affected, as Pan et al. (24) also note.”
From Maternal nutritional status and the risk of metabolic syndrome in pregnancy: implications for public health nutrition (2026) · cites this paper as Pan et al. [24]
Cites
Metzger, B. E., Gabbe, S. G., Persson, B., Lowe, L. P., Dyer, A. R., Oats, J. J. N., & Buchanan, T. A. (2010) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc10-0719 · Cited by 1,888 · see citing works
A prospective study of dietary patterns, meat intake and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus
Zhang, C., Schulze, M. B., Solomon, C. G., & Hu, F. B. (2006) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-006-0422-1 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Schoenaker, D. A. J. M., Mishra, G. D., Callaway, L. K., & Soedamah-Muthu, S. S. (2016) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-0540 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Association of midlife diet with subsequent risk for dementia
Akbaraly, T. N., Singh-Manoux, A., Dugravot, A., Brunner, E. J., Kivimäki, M., & Sabia, S. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.1432 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Association between healthy maternal dietary pattern and risk for gestational diabetes mellitus
Tryggvadottir, E. A., Medek, H., Birgisdottir, B. E., Geirsson, R. T., & Gunnarsdottir, I. (2016) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/ejcn.2015.145 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Izadi, V., Tehrani, H., Haghighatdoost, F., Dehghan, A., Surkan, P. J., & Azadbakht, L. (2016) · Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.nut.2016.03.006 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Circulating fatty acids and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: prospective analyses in China
Pan, X.-F., Huang, Y., Li, X., Wang, Y., Ye, Y., Chen, H., Marklund, M., Wen, Y., Liu, Y., Zeng, H., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/eje-21-0118 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wu, Y., Gao, Z., Gou, Y., Yan, L., & Duan, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1862412
- Authors
- Pan, W., Karatela, S., Lu, Q., Xie, L., Wu, S., Jing, J., & Cai, L.
- Affiliations
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Cai, Li
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2023-02-06
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 958-965
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W4319294978
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Chinese Nutrition Society
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
- Keywords
- maternal glucose metabolism, gestational diabetes mellitus, Chinese Dietary Guidelines, dietary guideline adherence, animal food intake, postprandial blood glucose, fasting blood glucose
- MeSH terms
- East Asian People, Blood Glucose, Diet, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Diabetes, Gestational
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review