Cited by 50

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Segmentary State Formation and the Ritual Control of Water Under the Incas

Gose, Peter·1993·Comparative Studies in Society and History

Abstract

There is a strange and unacknowledged paradox in the historiography of the Incas. On the one hand, few would deny that theirs was a typically theocratic archaic state, a divine kingship in which the Inca was thought to.be the son of the Sun. On the other hand, the standard descriptions of Inca political structure barely mention religion and seem to assume a formal separation between state and cult.1 I believe that these secularizing accounts are misguided and will show in this essay that the political structure of the pre-Columbian Andes took form primarily around a system of sacred ancestral relics and origin points known generically as huacas. Each huaca defined a level of political organization that might nest into units of a higher order or subdivide into smaller groupings. Collectively they formed a segmentary hierarchy that transcended the boundaries of local ethnic polities and provided the basis for empires like that of the Incas. However, these huacas were also the focus of local kinship relations and agrarian fertility rituals. The political structure that they articulated therefore had a built-in concern for the metaphysical reproduction of human, animal, and plant life. Political power in the pre-Columbian Andes was particularly bound up with attempts to control the flow of water across the frontier of life and death, resulting in no clear distinction between ritual and administration.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0010417500018557

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 92

  1. Silverblatt, 1977, Mito y Renovación. El Caso de Moros y los Aymaraes, Allpanchis, 10, 93, 10.36901/allpanchis.v9i10.848 · DOI
  2. Sherbondy, 1992, Andean Cosmologies through Time, 46
  3. Sarmiento de Gamboa, 1942, Historia de los Incas
  4. Zuidema, 1964, The Ceque System of Cuzco, 10.1163/9789004612402 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Rostworowski de Diez Canseco, 1983, Estructuras Andinas del Poder: Ideología Religiosa y Político
  6. Rostworowski de Diez Canseco, 1977, Etnía y Sociedad
  7. Rostworowski de Diez Canseco, 1962, Nuevos Datos sobre Tenencia de Tierras Reales en el Incario, Revista del Museo National, 31, 130
  8. Rojas, 1980, La Expansión del Quechua
  9. Holm, 1967, Money Axes from Ecuador, Folk, 8
  10. 10.1017/S001041750001505X · DOI
  11. Taylor, 1976, Camay, Camac et Camasca dans le Manuscrit Quechua de Huarochirí, Journal de la Société des Américanistes, LXIII, 231
  12. Polo de Ondegardo, 1916, Relación de los fundamentos acerca del notable daño que resulta de no guardar a los indios susfueros, in Informaciones acerca de la Religión v Gobierno de los Incas, 1, 45
  13. Polo de Ondegardo, 1916, De los errores y supersticiones de los indios, sacadas del tratado y averiguación que hizo el Licenciado Polo, in Informaciones acerca de la Religión y Gobierno de los Incas, 1, 3
  14. 10.1017/CBO9780511753091.019 · DOI
  15. Taylor, 1980, Supay, Amerindia, 5, 47
  16. Murra, 1980, The Economic Organization of the Inca State
  17. 10.1017/CBO9780511753091.010 · DOI
  18. Kertzer, 1988, Ritual, Politics and Power
  19. Murra, 1975, Formaciones Económicas y Politicas del Mundo Andino
  20. Fuenzalida, 1970, Hacienda, Comunidady Campesinado en el Perú, 291
  21. Zuidema, 1976, La Constelación de la Llama en los Andes Peruanos, Allpanchis, 9, 59, 10.36901/allpanchis.v8i9.1086 · DOI
  22. Betanzos, 1987, Suma y Naraciónde los Incas
  23. Gose P. 1986. “Work, Class and Culture in Huaquirca, a Village in the Southern Peruvian Andes.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of London.
  24. Geertz, 1980, Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth-Century Bali
  25. Valcárcel, 1980, Historia del Perú, 3, 75
  26. Evans-Pritchard, 1940, The Nuer
  27. Espinoza, 1978, Los Modos de Produccóon en el Imperio de los lncas
  28. Díaz, 1956, The Discovery and Conquest of Mexico
  29. Earls, 1978, La Realidad Física y Social en la Cosmología Andina, Actes du XLIIe Congrés International des Américanistes, IV, 297
  30. 10.3406/jsa.1979.2171 · DOI
  31. Duviols, 1986, Cultura Andina y Represión: Procesos y Visitas de Idolatrías y Hechicerías, Siglo XVII
  32. Cobo, 1956, Historia del Nuevo Mundo
  33. Duviols, 1978, Un Symbolisme Andin du Double: La Lithomorphose de l’Ancêtre, Actes du XLIIe Congrès International des Américanistes, IV, 359
  34. Carrion Cachot, 1955, El Culto de Agua en el Antiguo Peru, Revista del Museo Nacional de Antropología y Arqueología, 11, 4
  35. 10.1515/9783110810011 · DOI
  36. Leach, 1961, Pul Eliya
  37. Zuidema, 1962, The Wonder of Man's Ingenuity, 156, 10.1163/9789004544994_016 · DOI
  38. Cock, 1979, Del Culto Solar a la Clandestinidad de Inti y Punchao, Historia y Cultura, 12, 51
  39. Torero, 1974, El Quechua y la Historia Social Andina
  40. González Holguín, 1952, Vocabulario de la Lengua General de todo el Perú Llamado Lenqua Qqichua o del Inca
  41. Arguedas, 1964, Estudios Sobre la Cultura Actual del Perú, 221
  42. Helms, 1981, Precious Metals and Politics: Style and Ideology in the Intermediate Area and Peru, Journal of Latin American Lore, 7, 215
  43. Earls, 1979, Etnohistoria y Antropología Andina, 55
  44. Cieza de Leon, 1984, La Crónica del Perú, 1, 10.18800/9788489292260 · DOI
  45. Santo Tomás, 1951, Lexicon o Vocabulario de la Lengua General del Peru
  46. Hocart, 1970, Kings and Councillors
  47. Murúa, 1987, Historia General del Perú
  48. Guaman Poma de Ayala, 1936, Nueva Corónica y Buen Gobierno
  49. 10.4000/books.ifea.3104 · DOI
  50. Duviols, 1979, Un Symbolisme de l’Occupation, de l’Aménagement et de l’Explotation de l’Espace: Le Monolithe ‘Huanca’ et sa Fonctione dans les Andes Préhispaniques, L’Homme, 19, 7
  51. Ávila, 1966, Dioses y Hombres de Huarochirí
  52. 10.3406/jsa.1974.2131 · DOI
  53. Albornoz, 1967, Instructión para Descubrir todas las Guacas del Piru y sus Camayos y Haziendas, Journal de la Société des Américanistes, LVI, 8
  54. Levillier, 1924, Gobernautes del Perú, 4
  55. Torero, 1985, El Comercio Lejano y la Difusión del Quechua. El Caso de Ecuador, Revista Andina, 4, 367
  56. Frazer, 1922, The Golden Bough, 10.1007/978-1-349-00400-3 · DOI
  57. Ramirez, 1986, Andean Archaeology: Papers in Memory of Clifford Evans, 225
  58. Sherbondy, 1982, El Ragadío, Los Lagos y los Mitos de Origen, Allpanchis, 20, 3, 10.36901/allpanchis.v14i20.1060 · DOI
  59. Isbell, 1985, To Defend Ourselves: Ecology and Ritual in an Andean Village
  60. Huertas Vallejos, 1981, La Religión en una Sociedad Rural Andina (Siglo XVII)
  61. Millones, 1971, Las Informaciones de Cristóbal de Albornoz: Documentos para el Estudio del Taki Onqoy
  62. Marcos, 1978, Cruising to Acapulco and Back with the Thorny Oyster Set: A Model for a Lineal Exchange System, Journal of the Steward Anthropological Society, 9, 99
  63. Murra, 1958, Systems of Control and Bureaucracy in Human Societies, 30
  64. Arguedas, 1968, Las Comunidades de Espana del Perú
  65. Stern, 1982, Peru's Indian Peoples and the Challenge of Spanish Conquest
  66. Zuidema, 1978, Shafttombs and the Inca Empire, Steward Journal of Anthropology, 9, 1
  67. 10.1017/CBO9780511753091.017 · DOI
  68. 10.2307/279981 · DOI
  69. Zuidema, 1977, Andean Kinship and Marriage, 240
  70. 10.1525/rep.1984.8.1.99p00797 · DOI
  71. 10.1146/annurev.an.14.100185.001421 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Ávila, 1991, The Huarochirí Manuscript
  73. Moore, 1958, Power and Property in Inca Peru, 10.7312/moor92386 · DOI
  74. Arriaga, 1968, Extirpatión de la Idolatría en el Perú, in Biblioteca de Autores Espanoles, 209, 191
  75. Bastien, 1978, Mountain of the Condor: Metaphor and Ritual in an Andean Ayllu
  76. Segovia, 1968, Relación de muchas cosas acaescidas en el Perú, 209, 56
  77. 10.2307/278907 · DOI
  78. 10.2307/481802 · DOI
  79. Eling, 1986, Andean Archaeology: Papers in Memory of Clifford Evans, XXVII, 130
  80. Hartmann, 1979, ¿‘Quechuismo Preincaico’ en el Ecuador?, Ibero-Amerihanisches Archiv, 5, 267
  81. Santillán, 1927, Relacóon del Origen, Descendencia, Politico y Gobierno de los Incas, 9
  82. Duviols, 1973, Huari y Llacuaz: Agricultores y Pstores. Un Dualismo Prehispánico de Oposición y Complementaridad, Revista del Museo Nacional, 39, 153
  83. 10.2307/280017 · DOI
  84. Zuidema, 1980, El Ushnu, Revista de la Unwersidad Complutense, 28, 317
  85. Fock, 1981, Ecology and Mind in an Andean Irrigation Culture, Folk, 23, 311
  86. Santacruz Pachacuti Yamqui, 1927, Relacion de Antiguedades deste Reyno del Piru, 125
  87. Rostworowski de Diez Canseco, 1988, Conflicts over Coca Fields in XVlth-Century Perú, 10.3998/mpub.11396083 · DOI
  88. Pizarro, 1978, Relatión del Descubrimiento y Conquista de los Reinos del Perú
  89. Duviols, 1978, Estudios Americanistas, 1, 132
  90. 10.2307/280236 · DOI
  91. Kosok, 1965, Life, Land and Water in Ancient Peru
  92. Molina, 1916, Relación de las Fabulas y Ritos de los Ingas…, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gose, P.
Venue
Comparative Studies in Society and History
Published
1993-07
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
480-514
ISSN
  • 0010-4175
  • 1475-2999
Cited by
50
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review