The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Democracy-Enhancing Multilateralism
Abstract
International organizations are widely believed to undermine domestic democracy. Our analysis challenges this conventional wisdom, arguing that multilateral institutions can enhance the quality of national democratic processes, even in well-functioning democracies, in a number of important ways: by restricting the power of special interest factions, protecting individual rights, and improving the quality of democratic deliberation, while also increasing capacities to achieve important public purposes. The article discusses conflicts and complementarities between multilateralism and democracy, outlines a working conception of constitutional democracy, elaborates theoretically the ways in which multilateral institutions can enhance constitutional democracy, and discusses the empirical conditions under which multilateralism is most likely to have net democratic benefits, using contemporary examples to illustrate the analysis. The overall aim is to articulate a set of critical democratic standards appropriate for evaluating and helping to guide the reform of international institutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
Social States: China in International Institutions, 1980-2000
Johnston, A. I. (2008) · doi:10.1515/9781400852987 · Cited by 492
Cited by
Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere
Folke, C., Polasky, S., Rockström, J., Galaz, V., Westley, F., Lamont, M., Scheffer, M., Österblom, H., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., et al. (2021) · Ambio · doi:10.1007/s13280-021-01544-8 · Cited by 696
Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law
Krisch, N. (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228317.001.0001 · Cited by 477
DELLMUTH, L. M., & TALLBERG, J. (2015) · Review of International Studies · doi:10.1017/s0260210514000230 · Cited by 317
European Demoicracy and Its Crisis
Nicolaïdis, K. (2013) · JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/jcms.12006 · Cited by 304
The Concept(s) of Accountability: Form in Search of Substance
RACHED, D. H. (2016) · Leiden Journal of International Law · doi:10.1017/s0922156516000042 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Keohane, R. O., Macedo, S., & Moravcsik, A.
- Venue
- International Organization
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-31
- ISSN
- 0020-8183 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5088
- OpenAlex
- W2163454840
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 212.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Democracy-Enhancing Multilateralism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0020818309090018
- The paper
- Keohane, R. O., Macedo, S., & Moravcsik, A. (2009). Democracy-Enhancing Multilateralism. International Organization. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818309090018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.