The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Authoritarian Signaling, Mass Audiences, and Nationalist Protest in China
Abstract
How can authoritarian states credibly signal their intentions in international crises? Nationalist, antiforeign protests are one mechanism by which authoritarian leaders can visibly demonstrate their domestic vulnerability. Because protests in authoritarian states are risky and costly to repress, the decision to allow or stifle popular mobilization is informative. The threat of instability demonstrates resolve, and the cost of concession increases the credibility of a tough stance. The danger of instability and escalation increases foreign incentives to make concessions and preserve the status quo. This logic helps explain the pattern of authoritarian tolerance and repression toward nationalist protest. A case study of two U.S.-China crises shows how China's management of anti-American protests affected U.S. beliefs about Chinese resolve.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schelling, T. C. (1960) · Cited by 7,672
Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games
Putnam, R. D. (1988) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300027697 · Cited by 7,475
Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511510809 · Cited by 4,810
Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts
Scott, J. C. (2017) · Yale University Press eBooks · doi:10.12987/9780300153569 · Cited by 4,326
The Logic of Political Survival
Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M., & Morrow, J. D. (2003) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4292.001.0001 · Cited by 4,217
Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics
Gamson, W. A., & Tarrow, S. (1999) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2654187 · Cited by 3,884
Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics
Tarrow, S. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813245 · Cited by 3,268
Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies
O'Donnell, G. A., & Schmitter, P. C. (2013) · Cited by 2,956
Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes
Fearon, J. D. (1994) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2944796 · Cited by 2,360
What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?
Geddes, B. (1999) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.115 · Cited by 2,025 · cited 1×
“…2001; Schultz and Weingast 2003; and Stasavage 2007+ 10+ Weeks 2008+ 11+ Putnam 1988+ 12+ See Shirk 1993; Roeder 1993; and Bueno de Mesquita et al+ 1999+ 13+ Geddes 1999+ 4 International Organization ered in the streets and authorities have not suppressed it, the protest can rapidly swell to a…”
Background
Cited by
Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization
Lake, D. A., Martin, L. L., & Risse, T. (2021) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818320000636 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Weiss, J. C.
- Venue
- International Organization
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-35
- ISSN
- 0020-8183 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5088
- OpenAlex
- W2118644079
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 109.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Authoritarian Signaling, Mass Audiences, and Nationalist Protest in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0020818312000380
- The paper
- Weiss, J. C. (2013). Authoritarian Signaling, Mass Audiences, and Nationalist Protest in China. International Organization. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818312000380
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.