The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protection Through Presence: UN Peacekeeping and the Costs of Targeting Civilians
Open accessAbstract
Are UN peacekeepers effective in protecting civilians from violence? Existing studies examine this issue at the country level, thereby making it difficult to isolate the effect of peacekeepers and to assess the actual mechanism at work. We provide the first comprehensive evaluation of UN peacekeeping success in protecting civilians at the subnational level. We argue that peacekeepers through their sizable local presence can increase the political and military costs for warring actors to engage in civilian targeting. Since peacekeepers’ access to civilian populations rests on government consent, peacekeepers will primarily be effective in imposing these costs on rebel groups, but less so for government actors. To test these conjectures we combine new monthly data on the location of peacekeepers with data on the location and timing of civilian killings in Africa. Our findings suggest that local peacekeeping presence enhances the effectiveness of civilian protection against rebel abuse, but that UN peacekeeping struggles to protect civilians from government forces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics
Maddala, G. S. (1983) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810176 · Cited by 13,240
Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata
Guzmán, J. (2013) · Puerto Rico health sciences journal · Cited by 5,304
Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata
Long, J. S., & Jeremy Freese, A. (2014) · Cited by 4,624
The Logic of Violence in Civil War
Kalyvas, S. N. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818462 · Cited by 3,314
The Logic of Violence in Civil War
(2006) · The Logic of Violence in Civil War · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818462.001 · Cited by 2,402
Inside rebellion: the politics of insurgent violence
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-5891 · Cited by 1,708
Introducing the UCDP Georeferenced Event Dataset
Sundberg, R., & Melander, E. (2013) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343313484347 · Cited by 1,238
Sticks and Stones: Naming and Shaming the Human Rights Enforcement Problem
Hafner-Burton, E. M. (2008) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818308080247 · Cited by 926
Making War and Building Peace: United Nations Peace Operations
Doyle, M. W., & Sambanis, N. (2006) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400837694 · Cited by 864
Making War and Building Peace: United Nations Peace Operations
Freedman, L. D., Doyle, M. W., & Sambanis, N. (2006) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20032164 · Cited by 792
Metadata
- Authors
- Fjelde, H., Hultman, L., & Nilsson, D.
- Venue
- International Organization
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2018-08-29
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-131
- ISSN
- 0020-8183 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5088
- OpenAlex
- W2889163204
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 73.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protection Through Presence: UN Peacekeeping and the Costs of Targeting Civilians. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0020818318000346
- The paper
- Fjelde, H., Hultman, L., & Nilsson, D. (2019). Protection Through Presence: UN Peacekeeping and the Costs of Targeting Civilians. International Organization. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818318000346
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.