Cited by 119SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchRespiratory viral infections researchAnimal Virus Infections Studies

Effect of specific humoral immunity and some non-specific factors on resistance of volunteers to respiratory coronavirus infection

Open access
Callow, Kathleen A.·1985·Journal of Hygiene

Abstract

SUMMARY: Thirty-three volunteers were inoculated intranasally with coronavirus 229 E, and their responses monitored by antibody rises, symptomatology and virus excretion. These were related to their pre-trial immune status as indicated by concentrations of specific antibodies and non-specific proteins in serum and nasal washings. Both circulating and local specific antibodies were associated with protection from infection and disease, but only specific IgA antibodies of either type appeared to shorten the period of virus shedding. Although total secretory IgA was significantly associated only with reduction of symptoms, total protein in nasal washings appeared to protect against infection also, indicating that other locally produced proteins, not identified, may be associated with resistance. Two of the many factors which may affect the concentration of circulating and local protective proteins and thus influence the outcome of virus inoculation, namely, sex of the volunteer and the interval since the previous cold, were examined. Male volunteers or volunteers who had had evidence of a recent respiratory infection were less likely to be infected, but if they were infected, they had lower clinical scores and stopped shedding virus earlier than the rest. These groups possessed higher concentrations of specific antibodies and non-specific proteins in their pre-challenge sera and/or nasal washings. The significance of these findings is discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022172400062410

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most adults have probably had multiple hCoV exposures, and after an hCoV infection people can become reinfection-susceptible within 12-18 months.

    “By adulthood, most individuals are likely to have been exposed multiple times, with longitudinal studies and human challenge studies suggesting that individuals become susceptible to reinfection within 12–18 months after a previous hCoV infection74–78.”
  • Other scenarios are plausible: vaccine protection may be brief, or it may prevent severe disease without stopping spread.

    “alternative scenarios are also possible in which vaccine efficacy is either short lived or provides protection from severe disease but does not block transmission74–78.”
  • Controlled infection studies with endemic coronaviruses found that nasal IgA levels correlate with protection.

    “Historical studies of controlled human infection with endemic coronaviruses indicated that levels of nasal IgA correlate with protection against these infections35,36.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. ARTENSTEIN, M. S., BELLANTI, J. A. & BUESCHER, E. L. (1964). Identification of the antiviral substances in nasal secretions. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 117, 558-564.
  2. BEARE, A. S. & REED, S. E. (1977). The study of antiviral compounds in volunteers. In Chemoprophylaxis and Virus Infections of the Respiratory Trad, vol. n (ed. J. S. Oxford), pp. 27-55, Cleveland: CRC Press.
  3. BUSCHO, R. F., PERKINS, J. C, KNOPF, H. L. S., KAPIKIAN, A. Z. & CHANOCK, R. M. (1972). Further characterization of the local respiratory tract antibody response induced by intranasal instillation of inactivated rhinovirus 13 vaccine. Journal of Immunology 108, 169-177.
  4. BUTLER, W. T., WALDMAN, T. A., ROSSEN, R. D., GORDON DOUGLAS, R., J R & COUCH, R. B. (1970). Changes in IgA and IgG concentrations in nasal secretions prior to the appearance of antibody during viral respiratory infection in man. Journal of Immunology 108, 584-591.
  5. CATE. T. R., COUCH, R. B. & JOHNSON, K. M. (1964). Studies with rhinovirus in volunteers: production of illness, effect of naturally acquired antibody, and demonstration of a protective effect not associated with serum antibody. Journal of Clinical Investigation 43, 56-67.
  6. CATE, T. R., ROSSEN, R. D., GORDON-DOUGLAS, R., JR, BUTLER, W. T. & COUCH, R. B. (1966). The role of nasal secretion and serum antibody in the rhinovirus common cold. American Journal of Epidemiology 84, 352-363.
  7. COUCH, R. B., KASEL, J. A., Six, H. R., CATE. T. R. & ZAHRADNIK, J. M. (1984). Immunological reactions and resistance to infection with influenza virus. In The Molecular Virology and Epidemiology of Influenza, (ed. C. H. Stuart-Harris and C. W. Potter), pp. 119-152. London: Academic Press.
  8. EDMONDSON, W. P., PURCELL, R. H., GUNDELFINGER, B. F., LOVE, J. W. P., LUDWIO, \V. & CHANOCK, R. M. (1966). Immunization by selective infection with type 4 adenovirus grown in human diploid tissue culture. Journal of the American Medical Association 195, 453-459.
  9. FLEET, W. F., COUCH, R. B., CATE, T. R. & KNIGHT, V. (1965). Homologous and heterologous resistance to rhinovirus common cold. American Journal of Ejndemiology 82, 185-196.
  10. FREESTONE, D. S., HAMILTON-SMITH, S., SCHILD, G. C, BUCKLAND, R., CHINN, S. & TYRRELL, D. A. J. (1972). Antibody responses and resistance to challenge in volunteers vaccinated with live attenuated detergent split and oil adjuvant A2/Hong Kong/68 (H3N2) influenza vaccines. Journal of Hygiene 70, 531-543.
  11. HAMRE, D. & BEEM, M. (1972). Virological studies of acute respirator}' disease in young adults. V. Coronavirus 229 E infections during six years of surveillance. American Journal of Epidemiology 96, 94-106.
  12. HENDLEY, J. 0., GWALTNEY, J. M. Jit & JORDAN, W. S. (1969). Rhinovirus infections in an industrial population. IV. Infections within families of employees during two fall peaks of respiratory illness. American Journal of Epidemiology 89, 184-190.
  13. HEREMAKS, J. F. (1975). The secretory immune system. A critical appraisal. In The Immune System and Infectious Diseases, 4th International Convocation of Immunology, Buffalo, N.Y. 1974, pp. 376-385. Basel: Karger.
  14. HOLMES, M. J. (1973). Respiratory virus disease in the Antarctic: Immunological studies. In Polar Human Biology (ed. 0. G. Edholm and E. K. E. Gunderson), pp. 125-134. London: Heinemann Medical Books.
  15. HOLMES, M. J., REED, S. E., STOTT, E. J. & TYRRELL, D. A. J. (1976). Studies of experimental rhinovirus typo 2 infections in polar isolation and in England. Journal of Hygiene 76, 379-393.
  16. KRAAIJEVELD, C. A., MADOE, M. H. & MACNAUGHTON, M. R. (1980). Enzyme-linked immuno- sorbent assay for coronaviruses HCV 229E and MHV3. Journal of General Virology 49, 83-89.
  17. LIDWELL, O. M. & SOMMERVILLE, T. (1951). Observations on the incidence and distribution of the common cold in a rural community during 1948 and 1949. Journal of Hygiene 49, 365-381.
  18. LIDWELL, O. M. & WILLIAMS, R. E. O. (1961 a). The epidemiology of the common cold. I. Journal of Hygiene 59, 309-319.
  19. LIDWELL, O. M. & WILLIAMS, R. E. 0. ((19616). The epidemiology of the common cold. II. Cross-infection and immunity. Journal of Hygiene 59, 321-334.
  20. LOWRY.O. H.,ROSENBROUOH,N. J.,FARR,A. L. & RANDALL, R. J. (1951). Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry 193, 265-275.
  21. MILLS, J., VAN KIRK, J. E., WRIGHT, P. F. & CHANOCK, R. M. (1971). Experimental respiratory syncytial virus infection of adults. Journal of Immunology 107, 123-130.
  22. MONTO, A. S. (1974). Coronaviruses. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 47, 234-251.
  23. MURPHY, B. R., CHALHUB, E.G., NUSINOFF, S. R., KASEL, J. & CHANOCK, R. M. (1973). Temperature-sensitive mutants of influenza virus. II. Further characterization of the ts-1 (E) influenza A recombinant (H3N2) virus in man. Journal of Infectious Diseases 128, 479-487.
  24. PERKINS, J. C, TUCKER, D. N., KNOPF, H. L. S., WENZEL, R. P., KAPIKIAN, A. Z. & CHANOCK, R. M. (1969). Comparison of protective effect of neutralizing antibody in serum and nasal secretions in experimental rhinovirus type 13 illness. American Journal of Epidemiology 90, 519-520.
  25. PHILLPOTTS, R. J. (1983). Clones of MRC-C cells may be superior to the parent line for the culture of 229E-like strains of human respiratory coronavirus. Journal of Virological Methods 6, 267-269.
  26. RHODES, K., SCOTT, A., MARKHAM, It. L. & MONK-JONES, M. E. (1969). Immunological sex differences. A study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, their relatives and controls. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 28, 104-119.
  27. ROSSEN, R. D., BUTLER, W. T., WALDMAN, R. H., ALFORD, R. H., HORNICK, R. B M TOGO, Y. & KASEL, J. A. (1970). The proteins in nasal secretion. II. A longitudinal study of IgA and neutralizing antibody levels in nasal washings from men infected with influenza virus. Journal of the American Medical Association 211, 1157-1161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022172400062410 Published online by Cambridge University Press
  28. ROSSEN, R. D., SCHADE, A. L., BUTLER, W. T. & KASEL, J. A. (1966). The proteins in nasal secretion: a longitudinal study of the yA-globulin, yG-globulin, albumin, siderophilin, and total protein concentrations in nasal washings from adult male volunteers. Journal of Clinical Investigation 45, 768-776.
  29. SIEOEL, S. (1956). Non-parametric Statistics Table 87. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  30. SMITH, C. B M PURCELL, R. H., BELLANTI, J. A. & CHANOCK, R. M. (1966). Protective effect of antibody to parainfluenza type 1 virus. New England Journal of Medicine 275, 1145-1152.
  31. SOUTH, M. A., COOPER, M. D., WOLLHEIM, F. A. & GOOD, R. A. (1968). The IgA system. II. The clinical significance of IgA deficiency: studies in patients with agammaglobulinemia and ataxia-telangiectasia. American Journal of Medicine 4, 168-178.
  32. STUART-HARRIS, C. H. & FRANCIS, T., JR (1938). Studies on the nasal histology of epidemic virus infection in the ferret. II. The resistance of regenerating respiratory epithelium to reinfection and to physico-chemical injury. Journal of Experimental Medicine 68, 803-812.
  33. TOMASI, T. B., TAN, E. M., SOLOMON, A. & PRENDERGAST, R. A. (1965). Characteristics of an immune system common to certain external secretions. Journal of Experimental Medicine 121, 101-125.
  34. TOTMAN, R M KIFF, J., REED, S. E. & CRAIG, J. W. (1980). Predicting experimental colds in volunteers from different measures of recent life stress. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 24, 155-163.
  35. TOTMAN, R., REED, S. E. & CRAIG, J. W. (1977). Cognitive dissonance, stress and virus-induced common colds. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 21, 55-63.
  36. TREMONTI, L. P., LIN, J. L. & JACKSON, G. G. (1968). Neutralizing activity in nasal secretions and serum in resistance of volunteers to parainfluenza virus type 2. Journal of Immunology 101, 572-577.
  37. TYRRELL, D. A. J. & REED, S. E. (1973). Some possible practical implications of interferon and interference. In 'Non-specific' Factors Influencing Host Resistance (ed. W. Braun and J. Ungar), pp. 438-i42. Basel: Karger.
  38. WALDMAN, R. H. & HENNEY, C. S. (1971). Cell-mediated immunity and antibody responses in the respiratory tract after local and systemic immunization. Journal of Experimental Medicine 134, 482-494.
  39. YODFAT, Y. & SlLVlAN, I. (1977). A prospective study of acute respiratory tract infections among children in a kibbutz: the role of secretory IgA and serum immunoglobulins. Journal of Infectious Diseases 136, 26-30.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Callow, K. A.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Callow, Kathleen A.
Venue
Journal of Hygiene
Published
1985-08
Volume
95
Issue
1
Pages
173-189
ISSN
0022-1724 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109471081
Cited by
119
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Hygiene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
Keywords
HCoV-229E, humoral immunity, secretory IgA, local immunity, nasal washings, serum antibodies, viral shedding, sex differences, infection resistance, intranasal inoculation
MeSH terms
Adult, Antibodies, Viral, Coronaviridae, Coronaviridae Infections, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin A, Immunoglobulin A, Secretory, Immunoglobulin M, Immunity, Innate, Male, Nasal Mucosa, Neutralization Tests, Respiratory Tract Infections, Sex Factors, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review