Cited by 277Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismHallucinations in medical conditionsSocial Representations and Identity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional anatomy of inner speech and auditory verbal imagery

Abstract

The neural correlates of inner speech and of auditory verbal imagery were examined in normal volunteers, using positron emission tomography (PET). Subjects were shown single words which they used to generate short, stereotyped sentences without speaking. In an inner speech task, sentences were silently articulated, while in an auditory verbal imagery condition, subjects imagined sentences being spoken to them in an another person's voice. Inner speech was associated with increased activity in the left inferior frontal gyrus. Auditory verbal imagery was associated with increases in the same region, and in the left premotor cortex, the supplementary motor area and the left temporal cortex. The data suggest that the silent articulation of sentences involves activity in an area concerned with speech generation, while imagining speech is associated with additional activity in regions associated with speech perception.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291700033699

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Kawashima, 1993, A PET study of selective attention in man: cross-modality decreases in activity in somatosensory and visual tasks, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 13, S502
  2. Smith, 1992, Auditory Imagery, 95
  3. Bub, 1988, Psych Lab Experimental Software
  4. Scheffel, 1993, Changes in regional cerebral blood flow in response to externally and internally generated auditory stimuli, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 13, S532
  5. David, 1994, Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia, 269

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–277 of 277

Metadata

Authors
McGuire, P. K., Silbersweig, D. A., Murray, R. M., David, A. S., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D.
Affiliations
Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
McGuire, P. K.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
1996-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
29-38
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2132338600
Cited by
277
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
Keywords
inner speech, left inferior frontal gyrus, supplementary motor area, left temporal cortex, speech generation, speech perception, neural correlates, mental imagery
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Attention, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Dominance, Cerebral, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Imagination, Male, Regional Blood Flow, Speech Perception, Thinking, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review