Cited by 237Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismHallucinations in medical conditionsSocial Representations and Identity

A functional study of auditory verbal imagery

SHERGILL, S. S., BULLMORE, E. T., BRAMMER, M. J., WILLIAMS, S. C. R., MURRAY, R. M., McGUIRE, P. K.·2001·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We used functional MRI to examine the functional anatomy of inner speech and different forms of auditory verbal imagery (imagining speech) in normal volunteers. We hypothesized that generating inner speech and auditory verbal imagery would be associated with left inferior frontal activation, and that generating auditory verbal imagery would involve additional activation in the lateral temporal cortices. METHODS: Subjects were scanned, while performing inner speech and auditory verbal imagery tasks, using a 1.5 Tesla magnet. RESULTS: The generation of inner speech was associated with activation in the left inferior frontal/insula region, the left temporo-parietal cortex, right cerebellum and the supplementary motor area. Auditory verbal imagery in general, as indexed by the three imagery tasks combined, was associated with activation in the areas engaged during the inner speech task, plus the left precentral and superior temporal gyri (STG), and the right homologues of all these areas. CONCLUSIONS: These results are consistent with the use of the 'articulatory loop' during both inner speech and auditory verbal imagery, and the greater engagement of verbal self-monitoring during auditory verbal imagery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s003329170100335x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dialogal inner speech occurs when we imagine hearing someone, primarily as addressee, and involves representation and monitoring of our own voice and other people's voices.

    “Dialogal inner speech occurs when we imagine hearing someone, what is often referred to as auditory verbal imagery (Shergill et al., 2001). In dialogal situations, when we imagine someone talking to us, with their own voice, we primarily are the addressee (although perhaps also the speaker).”
  • Shergill et al.'s (2001) fMRI study found similar right hemisphere activation in six participants during first, second and third person auditory verbal imagery.

    “Similar right hemisphere activation was found in Shergill et al.’s (2001) fMRI study, in six participants who were examined during (first, second and third person) auditory verbal imagery.”
  • Participants' subjective experience of a fainter voice percept in MO and DO supports the account of less accurate internal models.

    “This account is supported by the participants’ subjective experience of a fainter voice percept in these more cognitively demanding conditions (see also Shergill et al., 2001).”
  • Shergill et al. (2001) found sentence repetition associated with activation of left IFG, STG, insula and SMA, while imagined speech in another person's voice recruited a bilateral frontotemporal network including right IFG, left pre-central gyrus and right STG.

    “While sentence repetition was associated with activation of left IFG, superior temporal gyrus (STG), insula and the SMA, imagined speech in another person’s voice recruited a bilateral frontotemporal network, including right IFG, left pre-central gyrus and right STG.”

    From The brain's conversation with itself: neural substrates of dialogic inner speech (2016) · cites this paper as Shergill et al. (2001)

  • Taken together, these findings suggest that dialogic forms of inner speech are likely to draw on a range of regions beyond a typical left-sided perisylvian language network, including the right IFG, right MTG and the right STG/STS.

    “Taken together, these findings suggest that dialogic forms of inner speech are likely to draw on a range of regions beyond a typical left-sided perisylvian language network, including the right IFG, right middle temporal gyrus (MTG) and the right STG/STS.”

    From The brain's conversation with itself: neural substrates of dialogic inner speech (2016) · cites this paper as Shergill et al. (2001)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SHERGILL, S. S., BULLMORE, E. T., BRAMMER, M. J., WILLIAMS, S. C. R., MURRAY, R. M., & McGUIRE, P. K.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2001-02
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
241-253
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W1993473416
Cited by
237
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
Keywords
inner speech, phonological loop, left inferior frontal cortex, left superior temporal gyrus, temporoparietal cortex, cerebellum, supplementary motor area, verbal self-monitoring
MeSH terms
Adult, Auditory Perception, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Imagination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Speech, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review