Cited by 109Mental Health Research TopicsBipolar Disorder and TreatmentSchizophrenia research and treatment

Dimensions of depression, mania and psychosis in the general population

KRABBENDAM, L., MYIN-GERMEYS, I., DE GRAAF, R., VOLLEBERGH, W., NOLEN, W. A., IEDEMA, J., VAN OS, J.·2004·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background. In order to investigate whether correlated but separable symptom dimensions that have been identified in clinical samples also have a distribution in the general population, the underlying structure of symptoms of depression, mania and psychosis was studied in a general population sample of 7072 individuals. Method. Data were obtained from the three measurements of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Symptoms of depression, mania and the positive symptoms of psychosis were assessed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Confirmatory factor-analysis was used to test statistically the fit of hypothesized models of one, two, three or seven dimensions. Results. The seven-dimensional model comprising core depression, sleep problems, suicidal thoughts, mania, paranoid delusions, first-rank delusions and hallucinations fitted the data best, whereas the unidimensional model obtained the poorest fit. This pattern of results could be replicated at both follow-up measurements. The results were similar for the subsamples with and without a lifetime DSM-III-R diagnosis. The seven dimensions were moderately to strongly correlated, with correlations ranging from 0·18 to 0·73 (mean 0·45). Conclusions. In the general population, seven correlated but separable dimensions of experiences exist that resemble dimensions of psychopathology seen in clinical samples with severe mental illness. The substantial correlations between these dimensions in clinical and non-clinical samples may suggest that there is aetiological overlap between the different dimensions regardless of level of severity and diagnosable disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291703001892

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KRABBENDAM, L., MYIN-GERMEYS, I., DE GRAAF, R., VOLLEBERGH, W., NOLEN, W. A., IEDEMA, J., & VAN OS, J.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2004-10
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
1177-1186
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2133764038
Cited by
109
References
55
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
depression, mania, psychosis, symptom dimensions, general population, psychopathology, sleep disorders, suicidal ideation, persecutory delusions, hallucinations, Nemesis, Composite International Diagnostic Interview
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Psychopathology, Psychotic Disorders, Risk Factors, Sick Role, Statistics as Topic, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review