Cited by 46Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Strategy implementation in obsessive-compulsive disorder and trichotillomania

Open access
CHAMBERLAIN, SAMUEL R., BLACKWELL, ANDREW D., FINEBERG, NAOMI A., ROBBINS, TREVOR W., SAHAKIAN, BARBARA J.·2006·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background. The use of strategies to aid performance when undertaking neuropsychological tasks is dependent on intact fronto-striatal circuitry, and growing evidence suggests impaired spontaneous use of strategies in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). However, studies to date have not examined the effects of strategy training on task performance in OCD or in trichotillomania (compulsive hair-pulling, a condition that has been argued to share overlap with OCD in terms of phenomenology and co-morbidity). Method. The ability to generate novel visuospatial sequences using a computer interface was examined before and after undertaking optimal strategy training in 20 OCD patients, 17 trichotillomania patients, and 20 controls (matched for age, education, and IQ). Results. OCD patients failed to improve ability to generate novel sequences above baseline despite successfully completing strategy training to the same extent as other groups. In contrast, performance of trichotillomania patients improved significantly after training to the same extent as controls. Groups did not differ on memory span, trial-by-trial action monitoring, or ability to generate novel visuospatial sequences prior to strategy training. Conclusions. Strategy implementation deficits, suggestive of cognitive inflexibility and fronto-striatal dysfunction, appear integral to the neurocognitive profile of OCD but not trichotillomania. Future research should investigate cognitive flexibility in obsessive–compulsive spectrum disorders using a variety of paradigms, and clarify the contribution of specific neural structures and transmitter systems to deficits reported.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291705006124

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alterations proposed in OCD include both inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility processes.

    “However, alterations proposed in OCD include both inhibitory control (inhibition of motor responses in means of increased impulsivity and/or compulsivity) and the cognitive flexibility processes defined as an ability to shift the focus of attention (6, 7) and/or recognize and handle conflicting information (competition of relevant and irrelevant stimuli) (8).”
  • Impaired inhibitory control has been reported in OCD patients on all three stages.

    “Impaired inhibitory control has been reported in OCD patients on all three stages (10), assessed mostly by variants of the Stroop color–word test (SCWT) (7, 11–13), or alternatively by the Go/No-go tasks [e.g., (14)] and the Stop signal tasks [e.g., (15)], measuring interference control, action restraint, and action cancellation, respectively.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CHAMBERLAIN, S. R., BLACKWELL, A. D., FINEBERG, N. A., ROBBINS, T. W., & SAHAKIAN, B. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Queen Elizabeth II Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
CHAMBERLAIN, SAMUEL R.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2005-10-05
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
91-97
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2075050067
Cited by
46
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (019407, 076274)
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, trichotillomania, strategy training, strategy implementation, cognitive flexibility, frontostriatal circuits, compulsive hair pulling, neuropsychological performance, action monitoring
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition Disorders, Corpus Striatum, Demography, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Perceptual Disorders, Space Perception, Trichotillomania, Visual Perception, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review