The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characteristics and functions of non-suicidal self-injury in a community sample of adolescents
Open accessAbstract
Background: Few studies have investigated non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), or the deliberate, direct destruction of body tissue without conscious suicidal intent, and the motivations for engaging in NSSI among adolescents. This study assessed the prevalence, associated clinical characteristics, and functions of NSSI in a community sample of adolescents. Method: A total of 633 adolescents completed anonymous surveys. NSSI was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Self-Mutilation (FASM). Results: Some form of NSSI was endorsed by 46·5% (n=293) of the adolescents within the past year, most frequently biting self, cutting/carving skin, hitting self on purpose, and burning skin. Sixty per cent of these, or 28% of the overall sample, endorsed moderate/severe forms of NSSI. Self-injurers reported an average of 12·9 (s.d.=29·4) incidents in the past 12 months, with an average of 2·4 (s.d.=1·7) types of NSSI used. Moderate/severe self-injurers were more likely than minor self-injurers, who in turn were more likely than non-injurers, to have a history of psychiatric treatment, hospitalization and suicide attempt, as well as current suicide ideation. A four-factor model of NSSI functions was indicated, with self-injurers likely to endorse both reasons of automatic reinforcement and social reinforcement. The most common reasons for NSSI were ‘to try to get a reaction from someone’, ‘to get control of a situation’, and ‘to stop bad feelings’. Conclusions: Community adolescents reported high rates of NSSI, engaged in to influence behaviors of others and to manage internal emotions. Intervention efforts should be tailored to reducing individual issues that contribute to NSSI and building alternative skills for positive coping, communication, stress management, and strong social support.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EQS : structural equations program manual
Bentler, P. M. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,669
(1993) · Cited by 7,136
Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder
Cary, G. L. (1994) · American Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1994.48.1.155 · Cited by 6,283
A Functional Approach to the Assessment of Self-Mutilative Behavior.
Nock, M. K., & Prinstein, M. J. (2004) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.72.5.885 · Cited by 1,536
Deliberate self harm in adolescents: self report survey in schools in England
Hawton, K., Rodham, K., Evans, E., & Weatherall, R. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7374.1207 · Cited by 1,008 · cited 1×
“Hawton et al. (2002) reported that 6.9% (n=398) of their sample of adolescents recruited in the UK engaged in NSSI within the previous year.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-mutilation in clinical and general population samples: Prevalence, correlates, and functions.
Briere, J., & Gil, E. (1998) · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry · doi:10.1037/h0080369 · Cited by 953
A Study of the Frequency of Self-Mutilation in a Community Sample of Adolescents
Ross, S., & Heath, N. (2002) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1023/a:1014089117419 · Cited by 787
Deliberate Self-Harm in a Nonclinical Population: Prevalence and Psychological Correlates
Klonsky, E. D., Oltmanns, T. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.8.1501 · Cited by 780
Nonsuicidal Self-Harm Among Community Adolescents: Understanding the “Whats” and “Whys” of Self-Harm
Laye-Gindhu, A., & Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (2005) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-005-7262-z · Cited by 746
Contextual Features and Behavioral Functions of Self-Mutilation Among Adolescents.
Nock, M. K., & Prinstein, M. J. (2005) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.114.1.140 · Cited by 724
Cited by
Swannell, S. V., Martin, G. E., Page, A., Hasking, P., & St John, N. J. (2014) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12070 · Cited by 1,624
Nock, M. K. (2010) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131258 · Cited by 1,550
International prevalence of adolescent non-suicidal self-injury and deliberate self-harm
Muehlenkamp, J. J., Claes, L., Havertape, L., & Plener, P. L. (2012) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health · doi:10.1186/1753-2000-6-10 · Cited by 1,156
Hamza, C. A., Stewart, S. L., & Willoughby, T. (2012) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.05.003 · Cited by 769
A meta-analysis of the prevalence of different functions of non-suicidal self-injury
Taylor, P. J., Jomar, K., Dhingra, K., Forrester, R., Shahmalak, U., & Dickson, J. M. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.073 · Cited by 758
Metadata
- Authors
- LLOYD-RICHARDSON, E. E., PERRINE, N., DIERKER, L., & KELLEY, M. L.
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2007-03-12
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1183-1192
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2081786574
- Cited by
- 928
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 30.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characteristics and functions of non-suicidal self-injury in a community sample of adolescents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s003329170700027x
- The paper
- LLOYD-RICHARDSON, E. E., PERRINE, N., DIERKER, L., & KELLEY, M. L. (2007). Characteristics and functions of non-suicidal self-injury in a community sample of adolescents. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s003329170700027x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.