Cited by 19Aging, Health, and DisabilityHealth disparities and outcomesMental Health Treatment and Access

Modelling complex pathways between late-life depression and disability: evidence for mediating and moderating factors

Open access
Carrière, I., Villebrun, D., Pérès, K., Stewart, R., Ritchie, K., Ancelin, M. L.·2009·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Previous research has consistently shown an association between depression and disability in the elderly but little is known about the mechanisms linking the two. Recent longitudinal population studies have shown considerable inconsistency in the criteria used to establish causality and terms such as mediation and effect modification have been frequently applied incorrectly in terms of the inferences drawn. We underline the necessity to adopt more stringent theoretical criteria for the establishment of intermediary effects in the relationship between depression and disability to better identify cross-validated potential intervention points for reducing the risk of disablement and depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291709005273

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Functional decline may lead to depression by limiting participation in social, leisure, and physical activities, thereby increasing chronic stress and social isolation.

    “functional decline may lead to depression by limiting participation in social, leisure, and physical activities, thereby increasing chronic stress and social isolation. (Carriere, Villebrun, Peres, Stewart, Ritchie, and Ancelin 2009;James, Wilson, Barnes, and Bennett 2011)”

    From Successful aging: Advancing the science of physical independence in older adults (2015) · cites this paper as Carriere et al. 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carrière, I., Villebrun, D., Pérès, K., Stewart, R., Ritchie, K., & Ancelin, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Carrière, I.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2009-02-26
Volume
39
Issue
10
Pages
1587-1590
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2097674086
Cited by
19
References
14
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Institut pour la Recherche en Santé Publique
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
geriatric depression, disability, older adults, mediation, effect modification, causal inference, disability risk, intervention targets
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Depressive Disorder, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Models, Psychological, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review