Cited by 191Mental Health and PsychiatryHistorical Psychiatry and Medical PracticesAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

An historical framework for psychiatric nosology

Open access
Kendler, K. S.·2009·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

This essay, which seeks to provide an historical framework for our efforts to develop a scientific psychiatric nosology, begins by reviewing the classificatory approaches that arose in the early history of biological taxonomy. Initial attempts at species definition used top-down approaches advocated by experts and based on a few essential features of the organism chosen a priori. This approach was subsequently rejected on both conceptual and practical grounds and replaced by bottom-up approaches making use of a much wider array of features. Multiple parallels exist between the beginnings of biological taxonomy and psychiatric nosology. Like biological taxonomy, psychiatric nosology largely began with 'expert' classifications, typically influenced by a few essential features, articulated by one or more great 19th-century diagnosticians. Like biology, psychiatry is struggling toward more soundly based bottom-up approaches using diverse illness characteristics. The underemphasized historically contingent nature of our current psychiatric classification is illustrated by recounting the history of how 'Schneiderian' symptoms of schizophrenia entered into DSM-III. Given these historical contingencies, it is vital that our psychiatric nosologic enterprise be cumulative. This can be best achieved through a process of epistemic iteration. If we can develop a stable consensus in our theoretical orientation toward psychiatric illness, we can apply this approach, which has one crucial virtue. Regardless of the starting point, if each iteration (or revision) improves the performance of the nosology, the eventual success of the nosologic process, to optimally reflect the complex reality of psychiatric illness, is assured.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291709005753

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most psychopathological processes and biological links to most mental health disorders remain unknown.

    “Despite efforts over the past century (1–3), most psycho- pathological processes and biological links to most mental health disorders remain unknown.”

    From Methods and challenges for assessing heterogeneity (2020) · cites this paper as [1]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kraepelin E Memoirs/Emil Kraepelin 1987 Berlin Springer-Verlag

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kendler, K. S.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Kendler, K. S.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2009-04-16
Volume
39
Issue
12
Pages
1935-1941
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2131144862
Cited by
191
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 9
FWCI
76.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA-011408, R37AA011408, R01AA011408)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH041953, MH-068643, R01MH068643, MH41953)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA011287, DA011287)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Keywords
psychiatric classification, history of psychiatry, biological taxonomy, species definition, top-down classification, Schneiderian symptoms, schizophrenia, DSM-III, historical contingency
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Classification, Europe, Humans, Psychiatry, United States, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, History, 16th Century, History, 17th Century, History, 18th Century, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review