Cited by 111Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Disorder-specific automatic self-associations in depression and anxiety: results of The Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety

Open access
Glashouwer, K. A., de Jong, P. J.·2010·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: Cognitive theory points to the importance of negative self-schemas in the onset and maintenance of depression and anxiety disorders. Hereby, it is important to distinguish between automatic and explicit self-schemas, reflecting different cognitive-motivational systems. This study tested whether patients with a current major depression and/or anxiety disorder are characterized by automatic self-anxious and self-depressive associations and whether these associations are disorder specific. Method: Patients (n=2329) and non-clinical controls (n=652) were tested as part of The Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety, a multi-center, longitudinal, cohort study with patients from different health care settings. Patient groups and non-clinical controls (18–65 years of age) were compared with regard to automatic self-anxious and self-depressive associations measured with the Implicit Association Test. Results: Individuals with an anxiety disorder showed enhanced self-anxious associations, whereas individuals with a depression showed enhanced self-depressive associations. Individuals with co-morbid disorders scored high on both automatic self-associations. Although remitted individuals showed weaker automatic self-associations than people with a current disorder, their automatic self-anxious/depressed associations were still significantly stronger than those of the control group. Importantly, automatic self-associations showed predictive validity for the severity of anxious and depressive symptoms over and above explicit self-beliefs. Conclusions: This study represents the first evidence that automatic self-anxious and self-depressive associations are differentially involved in anxiety disorders and depression. This may help to explain the refractoriness of these disorders and points to the potential importance of automatic self-associations in the development of psychopathological symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291709991371

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have reported abnormal implicit (and explicit) self-associations in rMDD, but only with small effect size or in response to negative mood.

    “Previous studies have reported abnormal implicit (and explicit) self-associations in rMDD, however only showing a small effect size and in a much larger sample showing higher residual depressive symptomatology (Glashouwer and de Jong, 2010), or in response to negative mood (Gemar et al., 2001).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glashouwer, K. A., & de Jong, P. J.
Affiliations
University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Glashouwer, K. A.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2009-10-08
Volume
40
Issue
7
Pages
1101-1111
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2079708841
Cited by
111
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 16
FWCI
10.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
self-schemas, depression, anxiety disorders, implicit associations, comorbidities, remission, symptom severity prediction, cognitive theories of depression
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Automatism, Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Severity of Illness Index, Word Association Tests, Cohort Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review