Cited by 11Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Depression recurrence after recovery: prognostic value of implicit and explicit self-depressed associations

Open access
van Tuijl, Lonneke A., Glashouwer, Klaske A., Elgersma, Hermien J., Bockting, Claudi L.H., Penninx, Brenda W.J.H., de Jong, Peter J.·2018·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Identifying predictors of depression recurrence may highlight targets for relapse prevention. This study tested the hypothesis that strength of implicit and explicit self-depressed associations (SDA) following recovery would lower the threshold for the recurrence of depression. Two main analyses were conducted to test: (i) predictive validity of SDA for recurrence in individuals with a history of depression (at least six months depression free; n = 616, six-year follow-up); (ii) predictive validity of both post-depression SDA and the extent of change in SDA following recovery for recurrence in individuals who recovered in the first two years of the study (n = 220, four-year follow-up). Further exploratory analysis tested the scar model of SDA in participants without a history of depression at baseline. Recurrence rate was 49% in both the first and second analysis. In the first analysis, implicit SDA and explicit SDA were related to recurrence in the unadjusted models, but not when controlling for baseline symptoms. In the second analysis, post-depression explicit SDA predicted recurrence over and above baseline residual depressive symptomatology. There was no support that implicit SDA following depression related to recurrence. However, there was support that stronger explicit SDA following a recent depression increased risk for recurrence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2018.06.001

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]1. Beck, A. T. (2002). In R. L. Leahy, & E. T. Dowd (Vol. Eds.), Cognitive models of depression: Vol. 14, (pp. 29-61). New York: Springer Pub.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Tuijl, L. A., Glashouwer, K. A., Elgersma, H. J., Bockting, C. L. H., Penninx, B. W. J. H., & de Jong, P. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
107
Pages
76-82
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2806386341
Cited by
11
References
31
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • ZonMw (10-000-1002, 451-15-026)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
depression recurrence, implicit associations, explicit associations, relapse prevention, recovery from depression, predictive validity, residual depressive symptoms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Recurrence, Self Concept, Secondary Prevention, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review