Cited by 134Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Trajectories of cognitive decline in different types of dementia

Open access
Smits, L. L., van Harten, A. C., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., Koedam, E. L. G. E., Bouwman, F. H., Sistermans, N., Reuling, I. E. W., Prins, N. D. +3 more·2015·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background.: To investigate trajectories of cognitive decline in patients with different types of dementia compared to controls in a longitudinal study. Method.: In 199 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), 10 with vascular dementia (VaD), 26 with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), 20 with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), 15 with language variant frontotemporal dementia (lvFTD) and 112 controls we assessed five cognitive domains: memory, language, attention, executive and visuospatial functioning, and global cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE). All subjects had at least two neuropsychological assessments (median 2, range 2–7). Neuropsychological data were standardized into z scores using baseline performance of controls as reference. Linear mixed models (LMMs) were used to estimate baseline cognitive functioning and cognitive decline over time for each group, adjusted for age, gender and education. Results.: At baseline, patients with dementia performed worse than controls in all cognitive domains ( p < 0.05) except visuospatial functioning, which was only impaired in patients with AD and DLB ( p < 0.001). During follow-up, patients with AD declined in all cognitive domains ( p < 0.001). DLB showed decline in every cognitive domain except language and global cognition. bvFTD showed rapid decline in memory, language, attention and executive functioning (all p < 0.01) whereas visuospatial functioning remained fairly stable. lvFTD declined mostly in attention and executive functioning ( p < 0.01). VaD showed decline in attention and executive functioning. Conclusions.: We show cognitive trajectories of different types of dementia. These estimations of natural disease course have important value for the design of clinical trials as neuropsychological measures are increasingly being used as outcome measures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291714002153

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smits, L. L., van Harten, A. C., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., Koedam, E. L. G. E., Bouwman, F. H., Sistermans, N., Reuling, I. E. W., Prins, N. D., Lemstra, A. W., Scheltens, P., & van der Flier, W. M.
Affiliations
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Smits, L. L.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2014-09-17
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
1051-1059
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2078970715
Cited by
134
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • EU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research
  • European Commission
  • Stichting Dioraphte
  • Alzheimer Nederland
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
cognitive decline, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, visuospatial functioning, executive function, attention, memory, clinical trial design
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Language, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Prospective Studies, Dementia, Vascular, Case-Control Studies, Disease Progression, Lewy Body Disease, Executive Function, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review