Cited by 82Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health Treatment and Access

‘At risk mental state’ clinics for psychosis – an idea whose time has come – and gone!

Open access
Ajnakina, Olesya, David, Anthony S., Murray, Robin M.·2019·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

At Risk Mental State (ARMS) clinics are specialised mental health services for young, help-seeking people, thought to be at ultra-high risk of developing psychosis. Their stated purpose is to reduce transitions from the ARMS state to clinical psychotic disorder. Reports of ARMS clinics provide ‘evidence-based recommendations’ or ‘guidance’ for the treatment of such individuals, and claim that such clinics prevent the development of psychosis. However, we note that in an area with a very well-developed ARMS clinic (South London), only a very small proportion (4%) of patients with first episode psychosis had previously been seen at this clinic with symptoms of the ARMS. We conclude that the task of reaching sufficient people to make a major contribution to the prevention of psychosis is beyond the power of ARMS clinics. Following the preventative approaches used for many medical disorders (e.g. lung cancer, coronary artery disease), we consider that a more effective way of preventing psychosis will be to adopt a public health approach; this should attempt to decrease exposure to environmental factors such as cannabis use which are known to increase risk of the disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291718003859

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 23 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    In South London, only 4.1% of patients with first-episode psychosis had previously contacted ARMS services and met ARMS criteria.

    “only a very small proportion (4%) of patients with first episode psychosis had previously been seen at this clinic with symptoms of the ARMS.”
    • Also stated in: § A public health approach · plain
      “They found that only 4.1% of FEP patients had previously made contact with ARMS services and met the ARMS criteria”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ajnakina et al. (2017)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationcitation

    It is difficult to determine with certainty when an individual moves from pre-psychotic symptoms to ARMS, and from ARMS to clinical psychosis.

    “Thus, it is difficult to define with certainty when an individual transits from pre-psychotic symptoms to the ARMS, and at the other end from the ARMS to clinical psychosis (David and Ajnakina, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites David and Ajnakina, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationcitation

    The reduced estimated transition rates from ARMS to clinical psychosis are likely at least partly due to factors other than successful interventions, such as changes in sample characteristics, pathways to care, and different definitions of transition.

    “However, it is likely that the reduced estimated transition rates are, at least in part, a consequence of other factors such as changes in characteristics of the sample or their pathways to care (Wiltink et al., 2015) as well as different definitions of what constitutes transition to psychosis employed across studies (van Os and Guloksuz, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Wiltink et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites van Os and Guloksuz, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationcitation

    The presence of psychotic symptoms by itself should not be taken as indicating risk of transition to psychosis.

    “Therefore, the presence of psychotic symptoms in themselves should not be seen as an indication of the risk to making the transition to psychosis (Murray and Jones, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Murray and Jones, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    The risk of psychosis increases linearly with greater frequency, longer duration, and stronger potency of cannabis used.

    “This risk has been shown to increase linearly with a greater frequency, longer length of use and the stronger potency of the cannabis used (Di Forti et al., 2014;Marconi et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Di Forti et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Marconi et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. 3
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 2
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Attempts to identify specific biological markers of the ARMS phase and predictors of transition from ARMS to clinical psychosis have been unsuccessful.

    “Furthermore, attempts to identify specific biological markers of the ARMS phase and predictors of a transition from the ARMS to clinical psychosis have been unsuccessful (Castle, 2012;Wood et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Castle, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wood et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The process of developing psychosis has already begun in people with ARMS, so intervening at this stage may already be too late.

    “Nonetheless, this does imply that the process of developing psychosis has already begun in people with the ARMS.Therefore, it reinforces the point that intervening at this stage may already be too late.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The scope for ARMS services to reduce or postpone the onset of psychosis is limited, as is their public health or economic impact.

    “This very low proportion suggests that the scope for ARMS services reducing or postponing the onset of psychosis is limited as is their public health or economic impact (van Os and Guloksuz, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites van Os and Guloksuz, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The 4.1% figure from South London is representative of other areas with well-developed ARMS clinics.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The identified pre-psychotic patients are diluted in more recent studies by large numbers of patients with other psychiatric problems.

    “Another important reason why transition rates are lower than previously reported may be that the identified pre-psychotic patients are diluted in more recent studies by large numbers of patients with other psychiatric problems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The development of ARMS clinics has increased awareness of a greater opportunity for prevention and early intervention.

    “The development of ARMS clinics has also increased awareness of a greater opportunity for prevention and EI.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
5 of 5
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 4.1% figure from South London is representative of other areas with well-developed ARMS clinics.

    “in an area with a very well-developed ARMS clinic (South London), only a very small proportion (4%) of patients with first episode psychosis had previously been seen at this clinic with symptoms of the ARMS.”
    “Ajnakina et al. (2017) carried out a comprehensive evaluation of FEP patients in an area of South-London which has had a welldeveloped ARMS service for more than 10 years serving the same catchment area.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Public education can effectively reduce society's consumption of high-potency cannabis.

    “However, an obvious place to start is by attempting to reduce society's consumption of high-potency cannabis through public education (Di Forti et al., 2015;Gage Psychological Medicine et al., 2016).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Reducing exposure to risk factors such as cannabis will substantially reduce the incidence of psychosis.

    “In the long-term, attempts to reduce exposure to these risk factors for psychosis should be made.”
    “A similar approach should be adopted for psychosis.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conventional mental health services are not generally engineered to detect and prevent psychosis onset from anxiety or depressive disorders, as claimed by some authors.

    “Conventional mental health services are not generally engineered to detect and prevent psychosis onset from anxiety or depressive disorders, as claimed by some authors 195,231”
  • Resources invested in prevention services may not reach population segments with a high prevalence of risk factors but low access to mental health care services.

    “Help-seeking behavior is associated with beneficial social determinants, and resources invested in prevention services -especially the few providing specialized early intervention -may not reach population segments with a high prevalence of risk factors but low access to mental health care services 135,196 .”
  • Help-seeking behavior is associated with beneficial social determinants.

    “Help-seeking behavior is associated with beneficial social determinants, and resources invested in prevention services -especially the few providing specialized early intervention -may not reach population segments with a high prevalence of risk factors but low access to mental health care services 135,196 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. van Os, 2013, Can we identify and treat ‘schizophrenia light’ to prevent true psychotic illness?, BMJ, 18, 346
  2. Stilo, 2010, The epidemiology of schizophrenia, Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 12, 305, 10.31887/DCNS.2010.12.3/sstilo · DOI
  3. McGorry, 2013, Designing youth mental health services for the 21st century: examples from Australia, Ireland and the UK, British Journal of Psychiatry, 54, 119214
  4. Malla, 2017, Outcome in patients converting to psychosis following a treated clinical high risk state, Early Intervention Psychiatry, 14, 12431

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ajnakina, O., David, A. S., & Murray, R. M.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Ajnakina, Olesya
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2018-12-26
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
529-534
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2905843893
Cited by
82
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11
FWCI
7.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Department of Health and Social Care
  • King's College London
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
psychosis prevention, first-episode psychosis, public health approach, cannabis use, environmental risk factors, service utilization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review