Cited by 358Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Validation of “prodromal” criteria to detect individuals at ultra high risk of psychosis: 2 year follow-up

Yung, Alison R., Nelson, Barnaby, Stanford, Carrie, Simmons, Magenta B., Cosgrave, Elizabeth M., Killackey, Eoin, Phillips, Lisa J., Bechdolf, Andreas +2 more·2008·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Background Identification of individuals "prodromal" for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders relies on criteria that predict onset within a brief period. Previous trials and biological research have been predicated on the view that certain "ultra high risk" (UHR) criteria detect "the prodrome", but there is a need to test the validity of these criteria.Aim To assess the predictive validity of the UHR criteria in a clinical population.Method The presence of UHR criteria was determined in 292 help-seeking individuals. At 2 year follow-up the number of new cases of psychotic disorder was assessed.Results The criteria significantly predicted onset of psychotic disorder within 2 years. The transition rate of 16% was much lower than in initial cohorts (over 40%).Conclusions The predictive validity of UHR criteria depends on the sample to which they are applied. Although young help-seekers meeting these criteria are at greater risk of psychotic disorder than those who do not meet them, caution is needed in their management, since a high transition rate can no longer be assumed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2008.07.012

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yung, A. R., Nelson, B., Stanford, C., Simmons, M. B., Cosgrave, E. M., Killackey, E., Phillips, L. J., Bechdolf, A., Buckby, J., & McGorry, P. D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Orygen (AU)
Corresponding author
Yung, Alison R.
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-10
Volume
105
Issue
1-3
Pages
10-17
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112064724
Cited by
358
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 45
FWCI
23.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
clinical high risk for psychosis, prodromal psychosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Delusions, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hallucinations, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Psychotic Disorders, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Comorbidity, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review