Cited by 34Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Intelligence quotient decline following frequent or dependent cannabis use in youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies

Open access
Power, Emmet, Sabherwal, Sophie, Healy, Colm, O’ Neill, Aisling, Cotter, David, Cannon, Mary·2021·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses of cross-sectional data assessing the effect of cannabis on cognitive functioning and intelligence show inconsistent results. We hypothesized that frequent and dependent cannabis use in youth would be associated with Intelligence Quotient (IQ) decline. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched Embase, PubMed and PsychInfo from inception to 24 January 2020. We included studies with non-treatment seeking samples and pre- and post-exposure measures of IQ. We requested data from authors if summary data was not available from published work. We preregistered our review with PROSPERO (ID no. CRD42019125624). We found seven cohort studies including 808 cases and 5308 controls. We found a significant effect for the association between frequent or dependent cannabis use in youth and IQ change, Cohen's d = −0.132 (95% CI −0.198 to −0.066) p < 0.001. Statistical heterogeneity between studies was also low at I2 = 0.2%. Study quality was moderate to high. This translates to an average decline of approximately 2 IQ points following exposure to cannabis in youth. Future studies should have longer periods of follow up to assess the magnitude of developmental impact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291720005036

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • IQ decreased by 2 points each year after the start of frequent or dependent cannabis use.

    “IQ, which decreased by 2 points each year after the start of frequent/dependent use [30].”

    From Cannabis, cannabinoids and health: a review of evidence on risks and medical benefits (2025) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Results (Full-scale IQ decline; page unavailable) report a 1.98-point IQ decline associated with frequent or dependent cannabis use. The Abstract describes approximately 2 points following exposure, not 2 points each year. The annual rate in the citing sentence is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is mixed evidence on the effects of the age of first cannabis use and duration of use on cognitive performance.

    “There is mixed evidence on the effects of the age of first cannabis use and duration of use on cognitive performance”

    From Cannabis, cannabinoids and health: a review of evidence on risks and medical benefits (2025) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports inconsistent findings on cannabis use and cognitive performance generally. The Discussion (page unavailable) says evidence on longer durations of use is sparse and that there are no longitudinal IQ data for onset between ages 18 and 25. It does not specifically report mixed findings about how age at first use and duration of use affect cognitive performance. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Brinch, C. N., & Galloway, T. A. (2012). Schooling in adolescence raises IQ scores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(2), 425– 430. PMC3258640 22203952
  2. Castellanos-Ryan, N., Pingault, J.-B., Parent, S., Vitaro, F., Tremblay, R. E., & Séguin, J. R. (2017). Adolescent cannabis use, change in neurocognitive function, and high-school graduation: A longitudinal study from early adolescence to young adulthood. Development and Psychopathology, 29(4), 1253– 1266. doi: 10.1017/S0954579416001280. 28031069 PMC5403347 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Degenhardt, L., Ferrari, A. J., Calabria, B., Hall, W. D., Norman, R. E., McGrath, J., … Whiteford, H. A. (2013). The global epidemiology and contribution of cannabis use and dependence to the global burden of disease: Results from the GBD 2010 study. PloS One, 8(10), e76635. 24204649 PMC3811989
  4. Di Forti, M., Quattrone, D., Freeman, T. P., Tripoli, G., Gayer-Anderson, C., Quigley, H., … van der Ven, E. (2019). The contribution of cannabis use to variation in the incidence of psychotic disorder across Europe (EU-GEI): A multicentre case-control study. The Lancet Psychiatry, 6(5), 427– 436. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30048-3. 30902669 PMC7646282 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Donovan, D. M., Bigelow, G. E., Brigham, G. S., Carroll, K. M., Cohen, A. J., Gardin, J. G., … Marlatt, G. A. (2012). Primary outcome indices in illicit drug dependence treatment research: Systematic approach to selection and measurement of drug use end-points in clinical trials. Addiction, 107(4), 694– 708. 21781202 PMC3537825
  6. Ellingson, J. M., Ross, J. M., Winiger, E., Stallings, M. C., Corley, R. P., Friedman, N. P., … Wall, T. L. (2020). Familial factors may not explain the effect of moderate-to-heavy cannabis use on cognitive functioning in adolescents: A sibling-comparison study. Addiction. Advance Publication Online. doi: 10.1111/add.15207. PMC7925696 32881239 · DOI
  7. Feingold, A. (2015). Confidence interval estimation for standardized effect sizes in multilevel and latent growth modeling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(1), 157. 25181028 PMC4324017
  8. Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., & Beautrais, A. L. (2003). Cannabis and educational achievement. Addiction, 98(12), 1681– 1692. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00573.x. 14651500 · DOI
  9. Fergusson, D. M., Lynskey, M. T., & Horwood, L. J. (1996). The short-term consequences of early onset cannabis use. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 24(4), 499– 512. 8886945
  10. Fried, P., & Smith, A. (2001). A literature review of the consequences of prenatal marihuana exposure: An emerging theme of a deficiency in aspects of executive function. Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 23(1), 1– 11. 11274871
  11. Fried, P. A., Watkinson, B., & Gray, R. (2005). Neurocognitive consequences of marihuana--a comparison with pre-drug performance. Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 27(2), 231– 239. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2004.11.003. 15734274 · DOI
  12. Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Corley, R. P., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., & Hewitt, J. K. (2006). Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychological Science, 17(2), 172– 179. 16466426
  13. Ganzer, F., Broning, S., Kraft, S., Sack, P. M., & Thomasius, R. (2016). Weighing the evidence: A systematic review on long-term neurocognitive effects of Cannabis Use in abstinent adolescents and adults. Neuropsychology Review, 26(2), 186– 222. doi: 10.1007/s11065-016-9316-2. 27125202 · DOI
  14. Grant, I., Gonzalez, R., Carey, C. L., Natarajan, L., & Wolfson, T. (2003). Non-acute (residual) neurocognitive effects of cannabis use: A meta-analytic study. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9(5), 679– 689. 12901774
  15. Hall, W. (2015). What has research over the past two decades revealed about the adverse health effects of recreational cannabis use? Addiction, 110(1), 19– 35. doi: 10.1111/add.12703. 25287883 · DOI
  16. Jackson, N. J., Isen, J. D., Khoddam, R., Irons, D., Tuvblad, C., Iacono, W. G., … Baker, L. A. (2016). Impact of adolescent marijuana use on intelligence: Results from two longitudinal twin studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(5), E500– E508. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1516648113. PMC4747759 26787878 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Leung, J., Chan, G. C., Hides, L., & Hall, W. D. (2020). What is the prevalence and risk of cannabis use disorders among people who use cannabis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 109, 106479. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106479. 32485547 · DOI · Paper page
  18. MacCabe, J. H., Wicks, S., Löfving, S., David, A. S., Berndtsson, Å, Gustafsson, J.-E., … Dalman, C. (2013). Decline in cognitive performance between ages 13 and 18 years and the risk for psychosis in adulthood: A Swedish longitudinal cohort study in males. JAMA Psychiatry, 70(3), 261– 270. 23325066
  19. Marie, O., & Zölitz, U. (2017). “High” achievers? cannabis access and academic performance. The Review of Economic Studies, 84(3), 1210– 1237.
  20. Mauro, C. M., Newswanger, P., Santaella-Tenorio, J., Mauro, P. M., Carliner, H., & Martins, S. S. (2019). Impact of Medical Marijuana Laws on State-Level Marijuana use by age and gender, 2004–2013. Prevention Science, 20(2), 205– 214. doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0848-3. 29103076 PMC5934322 · DOI
  21. Meier, M. H., Caspi, A., Danese, A., Fisher, H. L., Houts, R., Arseneault, L., & Moffitt, T. E. (2018). Associations between adolescent cannabis use and neuropsychological decline: A longitudinal co-twin control study. Addiction, 113(2), 257– 265. 28734078 PMC5760333
  22. Mokrysz, C., Landy, R., Gage, S. H., Munafò, M. R., Roiser, J. P., & Curran, H. V. (2016). Are IQ and educational outcomes in teenagers related to their cannabis use? A prospective cohort study. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 30(2), 159– 168. doi: 10.1177/0269881115622241. 26739345 PMC4724860 · DOI
  23. Morin, J.-F. G., Afzali, M. H., Bourque, J., Stewart, S. H., Séguin, J. R., O'Leary-Barrett, M., & Conrod, P. J. (2019). A population-based analysis of the relationship between substance use and adolescent cognitive development. American Journal of Psychiatry, 176(2), 98– 106. 30278790
  24. Orr, J. M., Paschall, C. J., & Banich, M. T. (2016). Recreational marijuana use impacts white matter integrity and subcortical (but not cortical) morphometry. NeuroImage: Clinical, 12, 47– 56. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.06.006. 27408790 PMC4925620 · DOI
  25. Orr, C., Spechler, P., Cao, Z., Albaugh, M., Chaarani, B., Mackey, S., … Garavan, H. (2019). Grey matter volume differences associated with extremely low levels of Cannabis use in adolescence. The Journal of Neuroscience, 39(10), 1817– 1827. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.3375-17.2018. 30643026 PMC6407302 · DOI
  26. Percy, A., McAlister, S., Higgins, K., McCrystal, P., & Thornton, M. (2005). Response consistency in young adolescents’ drug use self-reports: A recanting rate analysis. Addiction, 100(2), 189– 196. 15679748
  27. Perkonigg, A., Goodwin, R. D., Fiedler, A., Behrendt, S., Beesdo, K., Lieb, R., & Wittchen, H.-U. (2008). The natural course of cannabis use, abuse and dependence during the first decades of life. Addiction, 103(3), 439– 449. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02064.x. 18269364 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Pope, H. G., Gruber, A. J., Hudson, J. I., Cohane, G., Huestis, M. A., & Yurgelun-Todd, D. (2003). Early-onset cannabis use and cognitive deficits: What is the nature of the association? Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 69(3), 303– 310. doi: 10.1016/S0376-8716(02)00334-4. 12633916 · DOI
  29. Price, C. J., Ramsden, S., Hope, T. M. H., Friston, K. J., & Seghier, M. L. (2013). Predicting IQ change from brain structure: A cross-validation study. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 172– 184. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2013.03.001. 23567505 PMC3682176 · DOI
  30. Reuben, A., Caspi, A., Belsky, D. W., Broadbent, J., Harrington, H., Sugden, K., … Moffitt, T. E. (2017). Association of childhood blood lead levels with cognitive function and socioeconomic status at age 38 years and with IQ change and socioeconomic mobility between childhood and adulthood. Jama, 317(12), 1244– 1251. 28350927 PMC5490376
  31. Rocchetti, M., Crescini, A., Borgwardt, S., Caverzasi, E., Politi, P., Atakan, Z., & Fusar-Poli, P. (2013). Is cannabis neurotoxic for the healthy brain? A meta-analytical review of structural brain alterations in non-psychotic users. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 67(7), 483– 492. 24118193
  32. Rubino, T., Prini, P., Piscitelli, F., Zamberletti, E., Trusel, M., Melis, M., … Di Marzo, V. (2015). Adolescent exposure to THC in female rats disrupts developmental changes in the prefrontal cortex. Neurobiology of Disease, 73, 60– 69. 25281318
  33. Schreiner, A. M., & Dunn, M. E. (2012). Residual effects of cannabis use on neurocognitive performance after prolonged abstinence: A meta-analysis. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 20(5), 420. 22731735
  34. Taylor, M., Lees, R., Henderson, G., Lingford-Hughes, A., Macleod, J., Sullivan, J., & Hickman, M. (2017). Comparison of cannabinoids in hair with self-reported cannabis consumption in heavy, light and non-cannabis users. Drug and Alcohol Review, 36(2), 220– 226. 27296783 PMC5396143
  35. Twomey, C. D. (2017). Association of cannabis use with the development of elevated anxiety symptoms in the general population: A meta-analysis. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 71(8), 811– 816. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-208145. 28053188 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Vevea, J. L., & Hedges, L. V. (1995). A general linear model for estimating effect size in the presence of publication bias. Psychometrika, 60(3), 419– 435.
  37. Westlye, L. T., Walhovd, K. B., Dale, A. M., Bjørnerud, A., Due-Tønnessen, P., Engvig, A., … Fjell, A. M. (2009). Life-Span changes of the human brain white matter: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and volumetry. Cerebral Cortex, 20(9), 2055– 2068. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp280. 20032062 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Weye, N., Momen, N. C., Christensen, M. K., Iburg, K. M., Dalsgaard, S., Laursen, T. M., … Plana-Ripoll, O. (2020). Association of specific mental disorders with premature mortality in the Danish population using alternative measurement methods. JAMA Network Open, 3(6), e206646– e206646. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6646. 32492163 PMC7272122 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Power, E., Sabherwal, S., Healy, C., O’ Neill, A., Cotter, D., & Cannon, M.
Affiliations
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE)
Corresponding author
Power, Emmet
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2021-01
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
194-200
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W3122807857
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Health Research Board
  • H2020 European Research Council (724809)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
cannabis use, cognitive function, youth, cannabis use disorder, adolescent development, longitudinal cohort
MeSH terms
Marijuana Use, Adolescent, Cognition, Humans, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Longitudinal Studies, Cohort Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review