Cited by 1,523Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Persistent cannabis users show neuropsychological decline from childhood to midlife

Open access
Meier, Madeline H., Caspi, Avshalom, Ambler, Antony, Harrington, HonaLee, Houts, Renate, Keefe, Richard S. E., McDonald, Kay, Ward, Aimee +2 more·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Recent reports show that fewer adolescents believe that regular cannabis use is harmful to health. Concomitantly, adolescents are initiating cannabis use at younger ages, and more adolescents are using cannabis on a daily basis. The purpose of the present study was to test the association between persistent cannabis use and neuropsychological decline and determine whether decline is concentrated among adolescent-onset cannabis users. Participants were members of the Dunedin Study, a prospective study of a birth cohort of 1,037 individuals followed from birth (1972/1973) to age 38 y. Cannabis use was ascertained in interviews at ages 18, 21, 26, 32, and 38 y. Neuropsychological testing was conducted at age 13 y, before initiation of cannabis use, and again at age 38 y, after a pattern of persistent cannabis use had developed. Persistent cannabis use was associated with neuropsychological decline broadly across domains of functioning, even after controlling for years of education. Informants also reported noticing more cognitive problems for persistent cannabis users. Impairment was concentrated among adolescent-onset cannabis users, with more persistent use associated with greater decline. Further, cessation of cannabis use did not fully restore neuropsychological functioning among adolescent-onset cannabis users. Findings are suggestive of a neurotoxic effect of cannabis on the adolescent brain and highlight the importance of prevention and policy efforts targeting adolescents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1206820109

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In humans, adolescent cannabis exposure (ACE) has been reported to affect academic achievement, IQ, and performance on specific cognitive tasks.

    “In humans, studies have reported effects of ACE on academic achievement [144], IQ [145], and performance on specific cognitive tasks [146, 147] (but see also [148]).”

    From Consequences of adolescent drug use (2023) · cites this paper as [145]

  • In humans, studies have reported effects of adolescent cannabis exposure on academic achievement and IQ.

    “In humans, studies have reported effects of ACE on academic achievement [144], IQ [145], and performance on”

    From Consequences of adolescent drug use (2023) · cites this paper as [145]

  • Cognitive deficits have also been shown to be associated with cannabis use.

    “Whilst cognitive deficits have also been shown to be associated with cannabis use (63) these studies suffer from the same issues as discussed above regarding establishing whether association from observational studies are causal or not.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lezak MD (2004) Neuropsychological Assessment (Oxford Univ Press, New York), 4th Ed.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meier, M. H., Caspi, A., Ambler, A., Harrington, H., Houts, R., Keefe, R. S. E., McDonald, K., Ward, A., Poulton, R., & Moffitt, T. E.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-08-27
Volume
109
Issue
40
Pages
E2657-64
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2153739923
Cited by
1,523
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 103 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 144 · 2019: 139 · 2018: 119 · 2017: 149 · 2016: 152 · 2015: 130 · 2014: 114 · 2013: 83 · 2012: 15
FWCI
80.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Jacobs Foundation (AG032282)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K00381X, MR/K00381X/1, AG032282, G0100527)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-032282, R01AG032282)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-077874, R01MH077874)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P30DA023026)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD065563, R24HD065563)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
cannabis use, neuropsychological decline, cognitive impairment, adolescent brain development, neurotoxicity, cannabis cessation, Dunedin Study, birth cohort
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Marijuana Smoking, Mental Processes, Neuropsychological Tests, Prospective Studies, Regression Analysis, Cohort Studies, Least-Squares Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review