Cited by 52Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

A controlled examination of acute warning signs for suicide attempts among hospitalized patients

Open access
Bagge, Courtney L., Littlefield, Andrew K., Wiegand, Timothy J., Hawkins, Eric, Trim, Ryan S., Schumacher, Julie A., Simons, Kelsey, Conner, Kenneth R.·2023·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Background Near-term risk factors for suicidal behavior, referred to as ‘warning signs’ (WS), distinguish periods of acute heightened risk from periods of lower risk within an individual. No prior published study has examined, using a controlled study design, a broad set of hypothesized WS for suicide attempt. This study addressed this gap through examination of hypothesized behavioral/experiential, cognitive, and affective WS among patients recently hospitalized following a suicide attempt. Methods Participants were recruited during hospitalization from five medical centers across the USA including two civilian hospitals and three Veterans Health Administration facilities ( n = 349). A within-person case-crossover study design was used, where each patient served as her/his own control. WS were measured by the Timeline Follow-back for Suicide Attempts Interview and were operationalized as factors that were present ( v. absent) or that increased in frequency/intensity within an individual during the 6 h preceding the suicide attempt (case period) compared to the corresponding 6 h on the day before (control period). Results Select WS were associated with near-term risk for suicide attempt including suicide-related communications, preparing personal affairs, drinking alcohol, experiencing a negative interpersonal event, and increases in key affective (e.g. emptiness) and cognitive (e.g. burdensomeness) responses. Conclusions The identification of WS for suicidal behavior can enhance risk recognition efforts by medical providers, patients, their families, and other stakeholders that can serve to inform acute risk management decisions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291721004712

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Timeline follow-back interviews have identified other affective symptoms heightened during the crisis state, such as hostility, fearfulness, emptiness, self-hatred, and anger.

    “Timeline follow-back interviews—in which individuals are retrospectively asked to give detailed accounts of the time just before a suicide attempt as compared to a control condition—have also identified other affective symptoms that are heightened during this crisis state, such as hostility, fearfulness, emptiness, self-hatred, and anger (Bagge et al., 2023; King et al., 2023).”

    From Clinical indicators of the suicide crisis and response to ketamine (2025) · cites this paper as Bagge et al., 2023

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  2. Rossotto, E., Yager, J., & Rorty, M. (1998). The impulsive behavior scale. In Vanderlinden J, Vandereycken W. (Eds.), Trauma, dissociation, and impulse dyscontrol in eating disorders. Bristol, PA: Brunner/Mazel, 1–228.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bagge, C. L., Littlefield, A. K., Wiegand, T. J., Hawkins, E., Trim, R. S., Schumacher, J. A., Simons, K., & Conner, K. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Texas Tech University (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Bagge, Courtney L.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2022-01-25
Volume
53
Issue
7
Pages
2768-2776
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W4206986260
Cited by
52
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
suicide attempts, warning signs, hospitalized patients, alcohol consumption, emptiness, perceived burdensomeness, risk identification, suicide risk management
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Risk Factors, Suicide, Attempted, Cross-Over Studies, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review