Cited by 22Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseMental Health via Writing

24-hour warning signs for adolescent suicide attempts

Open access
King, Cheryl A., Gipson Allen, Polly Y., Ahamed, Sheikh Iqbal, Webb, Michael, Casper, T. Charles, Brent, David, Grupp-Phelan, Jacqueline, Rogers, T. Alexander +4 more·2024·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: youth may be at greatest risk for attempting suicide, which is critically important information for the parents, caregivers, and professionals who care for youth at risk. This study used adolescent and parent reports, and a case-crossover, within-subject design to identify 24-hour warning signs (WS) for suicide attempts. METHODS: = 1094, ages 13 to 18) with one or more suicide risk factors were enrolled and invited to complete bi-weekly, 8-10 item text message surveys for 18 months. Adolescents who reported a suicide attempt (survey item) were invited to participate in an interview regarding their thoughts, feelings/emotions, and behaviors/events during the 24-hours prior to their attempt (case period) and a prior 24-hour period (control period). Their parents participated in an interview regarding the adolescents' behaviors/events during these same periods. Adolescent or adolescent and parent interviews were completed for 105 adolescents (81.9% female; 66.7% White, 19.0% Black, 14.3% other). RESULTS: Both parent and adolescent reports of suicidal communications and withdrawal from social and other activities differentiated case and control periods. Adolescent reports also identified feelings (self-hate, emotional pain, rush of feelings, lower levels of rage toward others), cognitions (suicidal rumination, perceived burdensomeness, anger/hostility), and serious conflict with parents as WS in multi-variable models. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified 24-hour WS in the domains of cognitions, feelings, and behaviors/events, providing an evidence base for the dissemination of information about signs of proximal risk for adolescent suicide attempts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291723003112

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Timeline follow-back interviews have identified other affective symptoms heightened during the crisis state, such as hostility, fearfulness, emptiness, self-hatred, and anger.

    “Timeline follow-back interviews—in which individuals are retrospectively asked to give detailed accounts of the time just before a suicide attempt as compared to a control condition—have also identified other affective symptoms that are heightened during this crisis state, such as hostility, fearfulness, emptiness, self-hatred, and anger (Bagge et al., 2023; King et al., 2023).”

    From Clinical indicators of the suicide crisis and response to ketamine (2025) · cites this paper as King et al., 2023

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bagge, C. L., Conner, K. R., & Littlefield, A. (2019, April). Validity of the Warning SIgns for Suicide Attempts Assessment -Adult Version. In C. King (Chair), Understanding proximal risk for suicide attempts. Paper presented at the American Association of Suicidology Annual Symposium, Denver, CO.
  2. Cheryl A. King et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291723003112 Published online by Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, C. A., Gipson Allen, P. Y., Ahamed, S. I., Webb, M., Casper, T. C., Brent, D., Grupp-Phelan, J., Rogers, T. A., Arango, A., Al-Dajani, N., McGuire, T. C., & Bagge, C. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Marquette University (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
King, Cheryl A.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2023-11-10
Volume
54
Issue
7
Pages
1272-1283
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W4388568174
Cited by
22
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
  • University of Michigan
  • Once Upon A Time Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH113582)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
adolescent suicide attempts, suicide warning signs, social withdrawal, perceived burdensomeness, parent-adolescent conflict, self-hatred, emotional pain, anger, youth suicide prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Suicide, Attempted, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review