Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neural reward processing among children with conduct disorder and mild traumatic brain injury in the ABCD study

Carr, Hannah Rae, Eisenbarth, Hedwig, Golm, Dennis, Waller, Rebecca, Brandt, Valerie·2025·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: Conduct disorder and childhood head injuries frequently co-occur and are linked to a higher risk of later delinquency. While both are known to disrupt reward-related neural circuits, this study investigated whether their combined presence leads to a unique disruption in these pathways, potentially accounting for the increased risk of delinquency. Methods: Using neuroimaging data from the baseline (age 9–10) assessment from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, four groups were compared: children with conduct disorder (CD, n = 588), a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI, n = 1,216), both (mTBI+CD, n = 252), and typically developing controls (TD, n = 705). Neural activation in eight regions of interest (amygdala, hippocampus, nucleus accumbens, caudal anterior cingulate cortex, rostral anterior cingulate cortex, medial orbitofrontal cortex, thalamus, and insula) during reward anticipation and receipt were assessed during the monetary incentive delay task. Results: After controlling for several covariates, including sex, ADHD, and internalizing problems, the mTBI+CD group displayed greater left amygdala and hippocampal activation during reward receipt compared to all other groups. While they displayed increased activation in the right hippocampus and thalamus compared to TD controls and the right hippocampus compared to the mTBI group, they did not differ from the CD group. No group differences emerged during reward anticipation. Conclusions: Increased left amygdala and hippocampus activation in children with conduct disorder and a history of mild traumatic brain injury may reflect robust encoding of emotionally charged reward experiences, potentially reinforcing memory-guided, reward-seeking behaviors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291725102316

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1038/s41572-019-0095-y · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/hbm.24370 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1002/hbm.24184 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Swartz, 2020, Reward-related brain activity prospectively predicts increases in alcohol use in adolescents, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 59, 391
  6. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.03.003 · DOI
  7. 10.1017/S003329172500087X · DOI
  8. 10.1542/pir.21.8.265 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1037/rev0000339 · doi:10.1037/rev0000339
  10. 10.1016/j.dr.2013.06.001 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/00224278221081140 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.neures.2010.01.003 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1136/ip.2009.022483 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s00701-021-05086-6 · DOI
  16. 10.3758/s13415-017-0502-3 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/braincomms/fcae250 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/npp.2009.129 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119764 · DOI
  20. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.0379 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.04.006 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s40865-019-00126-3 · DOI
  23. Kaufman, 2017, The computerized kiddie schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia (KSADS): development and administration guidelines, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 56, S357
  24. 10.1007/s11065-015-9315-8 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1007/s00787-023-02175-y · DOI
  26. 10.1017/S095457942400141X · DOI
  27. Muthén, L. K. , & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
  28. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.11.013 · DOI
  29. 10.1542/peds.2023-062340 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1080/09297049.2020.1769582 · DOI
  32. 10.1207/s15374424jccp3501_11 · DOI
  33. 10.1089/neu.2019.6417 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s00787-023-02335-0 · doi:10.1007/s00787-023-02335-0
  35. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15081089 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1037/xge0000434 · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s11065-018-9385-5 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116091 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.049 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Elster, 2025, Altered neural responses to punishment learning in conduct disorder, Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 10, 936
  41. 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.11.016 · DOI
  43. 10.3390/biom11060823 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101051 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/02699050701426832 · DOI
  46. Cordova, 2022, Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Restricted phenotypes prevalence, comorbidity, and polygenic risk sensitivity in the ABCD baseline cohort, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 61, 1273
  47. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.19101092 · DOI
  48. 10.1006/nimg.2000.0593 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Carr, H. R., Eisenbarth, H., Golm, D., Waller, R., & Brandt, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton
  • Victoria University of Wellington
  • University of Pennsylvania
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2025
Volume
55
ISSN
  • 0033-2917
  • 1469-8978
Cited by
1
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.