Cited by 60Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The Effect of Personality on Withdrawal Severity and Taper Outcome in Benzodiazepine Dependent Patients

SCHWEIZER, E., RICKELS, K., De MARTINIS, N., CASE, G., GARCÍA-ESPAÑA, F.·1998·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Personality psychopathology exerts a significant and independent effect on the course of benzodiazepine (BZ) discontinuation, worsening the subjective severity of withdrawal symptoms and significantly increasing the occurrence of early taper failures. METHOD: One hundred and seventy-one patients participating in a BZ discontinuation programme were administered several personality measures prior to taper. Patients were stabilized for 3 weeks at their baseline BZ dosage and then tapered off 25% per week over 4 weeks, with the option to extend up to 6 weeks if necessary. RESULTS: High levels of passivity and dependency as assessed by the MMPI Dependence subcluster, and at a trend level high Eysenck Neuroticism and high TPQ Harm Avoidance contributed significantly to the prediction of benzodiazepine withdrawal severity. Though there was a high correlation between personality measures, psychopathology and adjusted BZ dose, the effects of personality on withdrawal severity was significant, particularly in the initial phases of BZ taper, when taper severity was still relatively mild. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that clinical decisions on how to manage BZ tapering should be guided by personality assessments, in addition to the usual considerations of BZ dosage, residual psychopathology, duration of treatment, etc. The potential for difficulty with discontinuation related to personality traits should be one of the factors weighted in the risk-benefit assessment made in the planning of benzodiazepine treatment for patients with anxious symptomatology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291798006540

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SCHWEIZER, E., RICKELS, K., De MARTINIS, N., CASE, G., & GARCÍA-ESPAÑA, F.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
1998-05
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
713-720
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W1994085939
Cited by
60
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MHO-8957)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
benzodiazepine withdrawal, benzodiazepine tapering, personality traits, harm avoidance, withdrawal severity, benzodiazepine dependence, anxiety disorders, personality assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Benzodiazepines, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neurologic Examination, Personality Disorders, Personality Inventory, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review