Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 582

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of suicide ideation and suicide attempts in nine countries

Open access
WEISSMAN, M. M., BLAND, R. C., CANINO, G. J., GREENWALD, S., HWU, H.-G., JOYCE, P. R., KARAM, E. G., LEE, C.-K., LELLOUCH, J., LEPINE, J.-P., NEWMAN, S. C., RUBIO-STIPEC, M., WELLS, J. E., WICKRAMARATNE, P. J., WITTCHEN, H.-U., YEH, E.-K.·1999·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background. There are few cross-national comparisons of the rates of suicide ideation and attempts across diverse countries. Nine independently conducted epidemiological surveys using similar diagnostic assessment and criteria provided an opportunity to obtain that data. Methods. Suicide ideation and attempts were assessed on the Diagnostic Interview Schedule in over 40000 subjects drawn from the United States, Canada, Puerto Rico, France, West Germany, Lebanon, Taiwan, Korea and New Zealand. Results. The lifetime prevalence rates/100 for suicide ideation ranged from 2·09 (Beirut) to 18·51 (Christchurch, New Zealand). Lifetime prevalence rates/100 for suicide attempts ranged from 0·72 (Beirut) to 5·93 (Puerto Rico). Females as compared to males had only marginally higher rates of suicidal ideation in most countries, reaching a two-fold increase in Taiwan. Females as compared to males had more consistently higher rates for suicide attempts, reaching a two- to three-fold increase in most countries. Suicide ideation and attempts in most countries were associated with being currently divorced/separated as compared to currently married. Conclusions. While the rates of suicide ideation varied widely by country, the rates of suicide attempts were more consistent across most countries. The variations were only partly explained by variation in rates of psychiatric disorders, divorce or separation among countries and are probably due to cultural features that we do not, as yet, understand.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291798007867

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 582

Metadata

Authors
WEISSMAN, M. M., BLAND, R. C., CANINO, G. J., GREENWALD, S., HWU, H.-G., JOYCE, P. R., KARAM, E. G., LEE, C.-K., LELLOUCH, J., LEPINE, J.-P., NEWMAN, S. C., RUBIO-STIPEC, M., WELLS, J. E., WICKRAMARATNE, P. J., WITTCHEN, H.-U., & YEH, E.-K.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
1999-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
9-17
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2157186588
Cited by
582
References
4
FWCI
16.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of suicide ideation and suicide attempts in nine countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033291798007867
The paper
WEISSMAN, M. M., BLAND, R. C., CANINO, G. J., GREENWALD, S., HWU, H.-G., JOYCE, P. R., KARAM, E. G., LEE, C.-K., LELLOUCH, J., LEPINE, J.-P., NEWMAN, S. C., RUBIO-STIPEC, M., WELLS, J. E., WICKRAMARATNE, P. J., WITTCHEN, H.-U., & YEH, E.-K. (1999). Prevalence of suicide ideation and suicide attempts in nine countries. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291798007867

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.