Cited by 58Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesAncient Egypt and ArchaeologyAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies

Radiocarbon Dates of Old and Middle Kingdom Monuments in Egypt

Open access
Bonani, Georges, Haas, Herbert, Hawass, Zahi, Lehner, Mark, Nakhla, Shawki, Nolan, John, Wenke, Robert, Wölfli, Willy·2001·Radiocarbon

Abstract

Between 1984 and 1995 over 450 organic samples were collected from monuments built during the Old and Middle Kingdoms. The most suitable samples were selected for dating. The purpose was to establish a radiocarbon chronology with samples from secure context and collected with the careful techniques required for 14 C samples. This chronology is compared to the historical chronology established by reconstructing written documentation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033822200038558

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The alluvial Nile soil may contain older inherited plant remains and organic compounds, which could result in radiocarbon dates older than the actual time of mudbrick production.

    “However, the alluvial Nile soil may also contain older inherited plant remains and organic compounds, transported by the Nile or from past human activities in the soil, which could result in radiocarbon dates older than the actual time of mudbrick production [70,97].”

    From The Minoan Thera eruption predates Pharaoh Ahmose: Radiocarbon dating of Egyptian 17th to early 18th Dynasty museum objects (2025) · cites this paper as [70]

    The Introduction/Sample Collection section says grass, straw, and reed were mixed into soil before mudbricks were shaped. Reporting of Sample Ages says some monument samples dated much older than the established mean. Neither section attributes older dates to inherited organic material in Nile alluvial soil or to material transported by the Nile or left by past human activity; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • More often the 14C dating results of organic material in mudbricks and mud seals were found to be older by many decades and even centuries than historical age assessments.

    “However, more often the 14C dating results of organic material in mudbricks and mud seals were found to be older by many decades and even centuries than historical age assessments [70,71,97].”

    From The Minoan Thera eruption predates Pharaoh Ahmose: Radiocarbon dating of Egyptian 17th to early 18th Dynasty museum objects (2025) · cites this paper as [70]

    The Introduction (page not provided) says radiocarbon dates often lacked close agreement with historical chronology, and the sample-collection section describes dating organic material from mudbricks. The passages do not establish that the dates were more often older by decades or centuries, and they do not mention mud seals. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The 5 radiocarbon dating results of the Ahmose mudbrick underline findings from other investigations that mud from alluvial Nile soil usually contains plant and organic components of different ages that are older than the "fresh" plant fragments added as straw at the time of mudbrick fabrication.

    “The 5 radiocarbon dating results of the Ahmose mudbrick (Table 4) underline findings from other investigations [70,97] that mud from alluvial Nile soil usually contains plant and organic components of different ages that are older than the “fresh” plant fragments added as straw at the time of mudbrick fabrication.”

    From The Minoan Thera eruption predates Pharaoh Ahmose: Radiocarbon dating of Egyptian 17th to early 18th Dynasty museum objects (2025) · cites this paper as [70]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The conclusion that the excess must be inserted between Neferkauhor and Mentuhotep IV is supported by the results of a large-scale radiocarbon dating study of Egyptian monuments by Bonani et al., which revealed an extensive anomaly in the age of the Old Kingdom samples.

    “This conclusion is supported by the results of a large-scale radiocarbon dating study of Egyptian monuments [Bonani et al. 2001, 1297-1300, Fig. 1], which revealed an extensive anomaly in the age of the OK samples.”

    From Sothic Dating of the Egyptian Old Kingdom (2024) · cites this paper as Bonani et al. 2001

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Bonani et al.'s study, a straw-only sample (DRI-2948) from a mudbrick of Amenemhet III at Dashur dated 3442 ± 41 BP, while a lump sample (DRI-2958) from the same mudbrick dated 4452 ± 73 BP, a difference of about 1000 radiocarbon years.

    “Sample DRI-2948 consisted only of straw, collected from a mudbrick, giving a 14C date of 3442 ± 41 BP. On the other hand, a lump sample of the same mudbrick, DRI-2958, containing all organic constituents including straw, yielded a much older 14C date of 4452 ± 73 BP, a difference of about 1000 radiocarbon years!”

    From The Minoan Thera eruption predates Pharaoh Ahmose: Radiocarbon dating of Egyptian 17th to early 18th Dynasty museum objects (2025) · cites this paper as [70]

    The Sample Collection and Sample Pretreatment sections describe straw from mudbricks and dating at DRI, but the retrieved passages do not identify DRI-2948 or DRI-2958 or give their ages. Searches for both sample IDs, 3442, 4452, and the Amenemhet III mudbrick comparison found no passage that verifies the claimed 1000-year difference. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Arnold JR, Libby WF. 1949. Age determinations by ra- diocarbon content: checks with samples of known age. Science 110(2869):678-80.
  2. Devine JM, Haas H. 1987. Scintillation counter perfor- mance at the SMU radiocarbon laboratory. Radiocar- bon 29(1):12-7.
  3. Haas H. 1979. Specific problems with liquid scintillation counting of small benzene volumes and background count rate estimation. In: Berger R, Suess H, editors. Radiocarbon dating. University of California Press. p 246-55.
  4. Haas H, Doubrava MR. 1998. Calibration technique for 14 C data clusters: fitting relative chronologies onto ab- solute time scales. Radiocarbon 40(1):561-9.
  5. Lehner M, Nakhla S, Hawass Z, Bonani G, Wölfli W, Haas H, Wenke R, Nolan J, Wetterstrom W. 1999. Dat- ing the Pyramids. Archaeology 52(5):26-33.
  6. Niklaus TR, Bonani G, Simonius M, Suter M, Wölfli W. 1992. CalibETH: an interactive computer program for the calibration of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 34(3):483-92.
  7. Polach H, Kaihola L, Haas H, Robertson S. 1987. Small sample 14 C dating by liquid scintillation spectrometry: Radiocarbon 30 (2):153-5.
  8. Stuiver M, Polach H. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14 C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355-63.
  9. Stuiver M, Reimer PJ, Braziunas TF. 1998. High-preci- sion radiocarbon age calibration for terrestrial and ma- rine samples. Radiocarbon 40(3):1127-51.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonani, G., Haas, H., Hawass, Z., Lehner, M., Nakhla, S., Nolan, J., Wenke, R., & Wölfli, W.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Supreme Council of Antiquities (EG)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Bonani, Georges
Venue
Radiocarbon
Published
2001
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
1297-1320
ISSN
  • 0033-8222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-5755
OpenAlex
W169707065
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiocarbon (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Keywords
radiocarbon dating, Old Kingdom, Middle Kingdom Egypt, Egyptian monuments, radiocarbon chronology, historical chronology, Egyptian chronology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review