Cited by 22Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesTree-ring climate responsesGeology and Paleoclimatology Research

14C Calibration in the 2nd and 1st Millennia BC—Eastern Mediterranean Radiocarbon Comparison Project (EMRCP)

Open access
Kromer, Bernd, Manning, Sturt W, Friedrich, Michael, Talamo, Sahra, Trano, Nicole·2010·Radiocarbon

Abstract

We have measured additional known-age German oak samples in 4 intervals in the 2nd and 1st millennia BC to add to (and to replicate) parts of the international Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon calibration data set. In the 17th, 16th, and 12th centuries BC, our results agree well with IntCal04. In the 14th and 13th centuries BC, however, we observe a significant offset, with our results on average 27 yr older than IntCal04. The previously reported 14 C offset between Anatolian juniper trees and central European oaks in the 9th and 8th centuries BC is smaller now, on the basis of our new measurements of German oak, but still evident. In the 17th and 16th centuries BC, the 14 C ages from the Anatolian chronology agree well with IntCal04 and our new German oak data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033822200045963

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The GOR time series was compared with IntCal98 and IntCal04 specifically because they do not include subsequent Hd GeO data, avoiding circularity.

    “We compare our data with these two records specifically because they do not include subsequent Hd GeO data (38), avoiding circularity.”

    From Mediterranean radiocarbon offsets and calendar dates for prehistory (2020) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says the Anatolian tree-ring series was compared with IntCal98 and IntCal04. But Tree-Ring Series and Methods says earlier Heidelberg German-oak measurements were already part of IntCal04, and the paper does not give avoidance of circularity as the reason for choosing those curves. The claim’s blanket statement that both curves exclude the relevant Hd GeO data is therefore not supported. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • We would have anticipated that the AA data on BCP and IrO should be similar to the IntCal datasets and the Hd GeO data, given the good agreement in other recent work between GeO and BCP and between GeO and IrO.

    “We would therefore have anticipated that the AA data on BCP and IrO (13) should be similar to the IntCal datasets (1–4) and the Hd GeO data (38), given the good agreement in other recent work between GeO and BCP (40–42) and between GeO and IrO (1–4).”

    From Mediterranean radiocarbon offsets and calendar dates for prehistory (2020) · cites this paper as [38]

    The citation is attached to the reported agreement between GeO and BCP. The Results and Discussion compare German oak with IntCal04 and Irish oak, but our copy does not report a GeO–BCP comparison; searches for BCP and bristlecone pine found none. Those other comparisons cannot establish the specific agreement attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Bannister B. 1970. Dendrochronology in the Near East: current research and future potentialities. Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences, Moscow 1964. Volume 5. p 336-40.
  2. Bietak M. 2003. Science versus archaeology: problems and consequences of high Aegean chronology. In: Bietak M, editor. The Synchronisation of Civilisations in the Eastern Mediterranean in the Second Millennium B.C. II. Proceedings of the SCIEM 2000- EuroConference. 2-7 May 2001. Vienna: Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. p 11-23.
  3. Bronk Ramsey C, Manning SW, Galimberti M. 2004. Dating the volcanic eruption at Thera. Radiocarbon 46(1):325-44.
  4. Bruins HJ, van der Plicht J, MacGillivray JA. 2009. The Minoan Santorini eruption and tsunami deposits in Palaikastro (Crete): dating by geology, archaeology, 14 C, and Egyptian chronology. Radiocarbon 51(2): 397-411.
  5. Buck CE, Blackwell PG. 2004. Formal statistical models for estimating radiocarbon calibration curves. Radio- carbon 46(3):1093-102.
  6. Friedrich M, Remmele S, Kromer B, Hofmann J, Spurk M, Hurni J-P, Kaiser KF, Orcel C, Küppers M. 2004. The 12,460-year Hohenheim oak and pine tree-ring chronology from central Europe-a unique annual record for radiocarbon calibration and paleoenviron- ment reconstructions. Radiocarbon 46(3):1111-22.
  7. Keenan DJ. 2002. Why early-historical radiocarbon dates downwind from the Mediterranean are too early. Radiocarbon 44(1):225-37.
  8. Kromer B, Münnich K-O. 1992. CO 2 gas proportional counting in radiocarbon dating-review and perspec- tive. In: Taylor RE, Long A, Kra RS, editors. Radio- carbon After Four Decades. New York: Springer-Ver- lag. p 184-97.
  9. Kromer B, Manning SW, Kuniholm PI, Newton MW, Spurk M, Levin I. 2001. Regional 14 CO 2 offsets in the troposphere: magnitude, mechanisms, and conse- quences. Science 294(5551):2529-32.
  10. Kuniholm PI. 1977. Dendrochronology at Gordion and on the Anatolian Plateau [PhD dissertation]. Univer- sity of Pennsylvania.
  11. Levin I, Naegler T, Kromer B, Diehl M, Francey R, Go- mez-Pelaez AJ, Steele LP, Wagenbach D, Welle R, Worthy DE. 2009. Observations and modelling of the global distribution and long-term trend of atmospheric 14 CO 2 . Tellus B 62(1):26-46.
  12. Manning SW. 1999. A Test of Time: The Volcano of Thera and the Chronology and History of the Aegean and East Mediterranean in the Mid Second Millennium BC. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
  13. Manning SW, Kromer B. n.d. Radiocarbon dating ar- chaeological samples in the Eastern Mediterranean 1730-1480 BC: further exploring the atmospheric ra- diocarbon calibration record and the archaeological implications. Archaeometry. In press.
  14. Manning SW, Bronk Ramsey C, Kutschera W, Higham T, Kromer B, Steier P, Wild EM. 2006. Chronology for the Aegean Late Bronze Age 1700-1400 B.C. Science 312(5773):565-9.
  15. Manning SW, Bronk Ramsey C, Kutschera W, Higham T, Kromer B, Steier P, Wild EM. 2009. Dating the San- torini/Thera eruption by radiocarbon: further discus- sion (AD 2006-2007). In: Manning SW, Bruce MJ, ed- itors. Tree-Rings, Kings, and Old World Archaeology and Environment: Papers Presented in Honor of Peter Ian Kuniholm. Oxford: Oxbow Books. p 299-316.
  16. Manning SW, Kromer B, Bronk Ramsey C, Pearson CL, Talamo S, Trano N, Watkins JD. 14 C record and wig- gle-match placement for the Anatolian (Gordion area) juniper tree-ring chronology ~1729 to 751 cal BC, and typical Aegean/Anatolian (growing season related) re- gional 14 C offset assessment. Radiocarbon. In press.
  17. Pearson GW, Stuiver M. 1986. High-precision calibra- tion of the radiocarbon time scale, 500-2500 BC. Ra- diocarbon 28(2B):839-62.
  18. Pearson GW, Stuiver M. 1993. High-precision bidecadal calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, 500-2500 BC. Radiocarbon 35(1):25-33.
  19. Reimer PJ, Baillie MGL, Bard E, Bayliss A, Beck JW, Bertrand CJH, Blackwell PG, Buck CE, Burr GS, Cut- ler KB, Damon PE, Edwards RL, Fairbanks RG, Friedrich M, Guilderson TP, Hogg AG, Hughen KA, Kromer B, McCormac G, Manning S, Bronk Ramsey C, Reimer RW, Remmele S, Southon JR, Stuiver M, Talamo S, Taylor FW, van der Plicht J, Weyhenmeyer CE. 2004. IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age cali- bration, 0-26 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46(3):1029- 58.
  20. Stuiver M, Becker B. 1993. High-precision decadal cali- bration of the radiocarbon time scale, AD 1950-6000 BC. Radiocarbon 35(1):35-65.
  21. Stuiver M, Reimer PJ, Braziunas TF. 1998. High-preci- sion radiocarbon age calibration for terrestrial and ma- rine samples. Radiocarbon 40(3):1127-51.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kromer, B., Manning, S. W., Friedrich, M., Talamo, S., & Trano, N.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg Academy of Sciences and Humanities (DE)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Hohenheim (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
Corresponding author
Kromer, Bernd
Venue
Radiocarbon
Published
2010
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
875-886
ISSN
  • 0033-8222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-5755
OpenAlex
W1918344794
Cited by
22
References
3
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiocarbon (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Institute for Aegean Prehistory
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Keywords
radiocarbon calibration, 2nd millennium BC, 1st millennium BC, tree-ring chronology, prehistoric chronology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review