Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 112

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gender Equity and Fertility in Italy and Spain

COOKE, LYNN PRINCE·2009·Journal of Social Policy
DOI 10.1017/s0047279408002584
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Gender equity and its effects on fertility vary across socio-political contexts, particularly when comparing less with more developed economies. But do subtle differences in equity within more similar contexts matter as well? Here we compare Italy and Spain, two countries with low fertility levels and institutional reliance on kinship and family, but with employment equity among women during the 1990s slightly greater in Italy than Spain. The European Community Household Panel is used to explore the effect of this difference in gender equity on the likelihood of married couples having a second birth during this time period. Women's hours of employment reduce the birth likelihood in both countries, but non-maternal sources of care offset this effect to different degrees. In Spain, private childcare significantly increases birth likelihood, whereas in Italy, father's greater childcare share increases the likelihood, particularly among employed women. These results suggest that increases in women's employment equity increase not only the degree of equity within the home, but also the beneficial effects of equity on fertility. These equity effects help to offset the negative relationship historically found between female employment and fertility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0047279408002584

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bernardi, 2005, Globalization, Uncertainty and Youth in Society
  2. 10.2307/3088937 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Craig L. (2003), ‘Do Australians share parenting? Time-diary evidence on fathers' and mothers’ time with children’, Presented at the 8th Australian Institute of Family Studies Conference, Melbourne, 12–14 February.
  4. 2001, Employment Outlook
  5. 2002, Employment Outlook
  6. Escobedo, 2001, Gender Mainstreaming in the European Employment Strategy
  7. 1998, Care in Europe: Joint Report of the ‘Gender and Employment’ and ‘Gender Law’ Group of Experts

Cited by

See all 112

Metadata

Authors
COOKE, L. P.
Venue
Journal of Social Policy
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2009-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
123-140
ISSN
  • 0047-2794
  • 1469-7823
DOI
10.1017/s0047279408002584
Cited by
112
References
52
Language
en
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.