The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: Magnetoencephalographic recordings
Abstract
Whole-head magnetoencephalographic (MEG) responses to repeating standard tones and to infrequent slightly higher deviant tones and complex novel sounds were recorded together with event-related brain potentials (ERPs). Deviant tones and novel sounds elicited the mismatch negativity (MMN) component of the ERP and its MEG counterpart (MMNm) both when the auditory stimuli were attended to and when they were ignored. MMNm generators were located bilateral to the superior planes of the temporal lobes where preattentive auditory discrimination appears to occur. A subsequent positive P3a component was elicited by deviant tones and with a larger amplitude by novel sounds even when the sounds were to be ignored. Source localization for the MEG counterpart of P3a (P3am) suggested that the auditory cortex in the superior temporal plane is involved in the neural network of involuntary attention switching to changes in the acoustic environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man
Knight, R. T. (1984) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · doi:10.1016/0168-5597(84)90016-9 · Cited by 828
Mismatch negativity-a unique measure of sensory processing in audition.
Näätänen, R., & Alho, K. (1995) · International Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.3109/00207459508986107 · Cited by 340
Self-citation
Cited by
The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review
Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026 · Cited by 2,644
Self-citationThe novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty
Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Gaeta, H. (2001) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00019-7 · Cited by 1,282
The P300: Where in the Brain Is It Produced and What Does It Tell Us?
Linden, D. E. J. (2005) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858405280524 · Cited by 833
Mechanisms of human attention: event-related potentials and oscillations
Herrmann, C. S., & Knight, R. T. (2001) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00027-6 · Cited by 600
Mismatch negativity (MMN), the deviance-elicited auditory deflection, explained
May, P. J. C., & Tiitinen, H. (2010) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00856.x · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Authors
- Alho, K., Winkler, I., Escera, C., Huotilainen, M., Virtanen, J., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Pekkonen, E., & Ilmoniemi, R. J.
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 211-224
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056988564
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: Magnetoencephalographic recordings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s004857729800211x
- The paper
- Alho, K., Winkler, I., Escera, C., Huotilainen, M., Virtanen, J., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Pekkonen, E., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (1998). Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: Magnetoencephalographic recordings. Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s004857729800211x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
