Cited by 340Neuroscience and Music PerceptionHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsNeural dynamics and brain function

Mismatch negativity-a unique measure of sensory processing in audition.

Näätänen, Risto, Alho, Kimmo·1995·International Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Physically deviant auditory stimuli occurring among frequent ("standard") stimuli (e.g., tones or phonetic stimuli) elicit the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the auditory event-related potential (ERP). The MMN is presumably generated by a mismatch process between the sensory input from a deviant stimulus and a neural sensory-memory trace representing the physical features of the standard stimulus. This process, as well as sensory analysis of auditory input and its encoding into the memory trace, appear to be automatic since the MMN is elicited even by changes in unattended auditory stimuli. Therefore the MMN indirectly provides a unique, objective measure of the central representation of a sound. This opens new possibilities for basic research as well as clinical and other applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/00207459508986107

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several neurophysiological studies in PTSD reveal that PTSD is often associated with extreme sensory processing patterns, including sensory hypersensitivity and hyposensitivity to stimuli associated with traumatic memories.

    “Indeed, several neurophysiological studies in PTSD reveal that PTSD is often associated with extreme sensory processing patterns, including sensory hypersensitivity and hyposensitivity to stimuli associated with traumatic memories (such as specific sounds, images, touch stimulation) (Näätänen and Alho, 1995; Grillon and Morgan, 1999; Shalev et al., 2000; Engel-Yeger et al., 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Näätänen, R., & Alho, K.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
International Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1995-01
Volume
80
Issue
1-4
Pages
317-337
ISSN
  • 0020-7454 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-5245
OpenAlex
W2085306469
Cited by
340
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
mismatch negativity, auditory event-related potentials, auditory sensory memory, automatic auditory processing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aging, Auditory Perception, Automatism, Blindness, Brain, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Humans, Learning, Memory, Middle Aged, Neural Pathways, Neuronal Plasticity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review