The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The promise of paleobiology as a nomothetic, evolutionary discipline
Abstract
During the past 20 years, paleobiology has established the foundations of a nomothetic science based upon evolutionary theory. This radical break with a past philosophy based on irreducible historical uniqueness is still impeded by (1) overreliance upon the inductivist methodology that embodied this previous philosophy, and (2) an unadventurous approach to biology that attempts passively to transfer the orthodoxies of microevolutionary theory across vast stretches of time and several levels of a hierarchy into the domain of macroevolution. I analyze the major trends of recent invertebrate paleobiology in the light of these two impediments. The formulation, by paleobiologists and with paleobiological data, of new macroevolutionary theories should end the subservience of passive transfer and contribute, in turn, to the formulation of a new, general theory of evolution that recognizes hierarchy and permits a set of unifying principles to work differently at various levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0086 · Cited by 7,770 · cited 2×
“I suspect that functional morphology will fulfill its promise when it probes the situations in which animals are not well designed—developmental, phyletic, and architectural constraints as marks of history (Seilacher 1972; Gould and Lewontin 1979).”
BackgroundSelf-citation"General Intelligence," Objectively Determined and Measured
Spearman, C. (1904) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1412107 · Cited by 6,207
Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution
Lande, R. (1976) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1976.tb00911.x · Cited by 1,828
Cited by
Individuals, hierarchies and processes: towards a more complete evolutionary theory
Vrba, E. S., & Eldredge, N. (1984) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1017/s0094837300008149 · Cited by 313
Community Ecology: Is It Time to Move On?: (An American Society of Naturalists Presidential Address)
Simberloff, D. (2004) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/420777 · Cited by 271
Predator control should not be a shot in the dark
Treves, A., Krofel, M., & McManus, J. (2016) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.1312 · Cited by 257
The Cambrian explosion: Animals or fossils?
Runnegar, B. (1982) · Journal of the Geological Society of Australia · doi:10.1080/00167618208729222 · Cited by 151
Methodological Issues in Americanist Artifact Classification
DUNNELL, R. C. (1986) · Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-003109-2.50007-6 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Gould, S. J.
- Venue
- Paleobiology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1980
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 96-118
- ISSN
- 0094-8373 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-5331
- OpenAlex
- W1758567571
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The promise of paleobiology as a nomothetic, evolutionary discipline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0094837300012537
- The paper
- Gould, S. J. (1980). The promise of paleobiology as a nomothetic, evolutionary discipline. Paleobiology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300012537
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
