The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Précis of Knowledge and the Flow of Information
Abstract
A theory of information is developed in which the informational content of a signal (structure, event) can be specified. This content is expressed by a sentence describing the condition at a source on which the properties of a signal depend in some lawful way. Information, as so defined, though perfectly objective, has the kind of semantic property (intentionality) that seems to be needed for an analysis of cognition. Perceptual knowledge is an information-dependent internal state with a content corresponding to the information producing it. This picture of knowledge captures most of what makes knowledge an important cpistcmological notion. It also avoids many of the problems infecting traditional justificational accounts of knowledge (knowledge as [justified, true belief’). Our information pickup systems are characterized in terms of the way they encode incoming information (perception) for further cognitive processing. Our perceptual experience is distinguished from our perceptual beliefs by the different way sensory information is encoded in these internal structures. Our ropositional attitudes – those (unlike knowledge) having a content that can be either true or false (e.g., belief) – are described in terms of the way internal (presumably neural) structures acquire during learning a certain information-carrying role. The content of these structures (whether true or false) is identified with the kind of information they were developed to carry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x · Cited by 48,949
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
Searle, J. R. (1980) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00005756 · Cited by 6,954
The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems
West, C. K., & Gibson, J. J. (1969) · Journal of Aesthetic Education · doi:10.2307/3331482 · Cited by 6,336
The information available in brief visual presentations
Sperling, G. (1960) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093759 · Cited by 4,042
Perception of the Visual World
(1952) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1952.01700030123016 · Cited by 3,732
Knowledge and the Flow of Information.
Alston, W. P., & Dretske, F. I. (1983) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184492 · Cited by 3,286
Self-citationIs Justified True Belief Knowledge?
Gettier, E. L. (1963) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/23.6.121 · Cited by 3,127
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Erman, 1980, Trends itt Speech Recognition, 361
- Haber, 1975, The Proceedings and papers of the 11th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 240
- Carnap, 1971, Inductive logic and probability
- Kyburg, 1961, Probability and the logic of rational belief
- (1980) The enterprise of knowledge. MIT Press. [IL]
- Good, 1977, Machine intelligence, 139
- Good, 1959, Could a machine make probability judgments?, Computers and Automation, 8, 14
- Cherry, 1951, A history of the theory of information, Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical Engineers, 98, 383
- Carter, 1957, Uncertainty and business decisions, 20
- Lehrer, 1970, Induction, acceptance, and rational belief
- Good, 1966, A derivation of the probabilistic explication of information, journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 28, 578, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1966.tb00668.x · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1966.tb00668.x
- Haber, 1976, Foundation of Language, 14, 211
- (1974) Information processing. In: Handbook of perception. vol. 1.historical and philosophical roots of perception, ed. Carterette E. C. & Friedman M. P. , pp. 313–33. Academic Press. [RNH]
- 10.1086/289062 · doi:10.1086/289062
- Kyburg, 1965, Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress for Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science
- 10.2307/2023571 · doi:10.2307/2023571
- Michie, 1977, Machine intelligence, 151
- Uhr, 1973, Pattern recognition, learning, and thought
- Weaver, 1948, Probability, rarity, interest and surprise, Scientific Monthly, 67, 390
- Rozeboom, 1983, Do mental systems have a scientific future?, Annals of Theoretical Psychology, 3
- (1967 b) Information and inference. Synthèse 17:369–91. [IL] · doi:10.1007/bf00485040
Cited by
Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior
(2016) · Studies in Information · doi:10.1108/s2055-53772016 · Cited by 1,540
Fallis, D. (2015) · Library Trends · doi:10.1353/lib.2015.0014 · Cited by 511
Dretske, F. (2008) · Philosophy of Information · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51726-5.50007-8 · Cited by 33
Self-citationQianchen, L., Gallagher, R. M., & Tsuchiya, N. (2022) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.210394 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Dretske, F. I.
- Venue
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1983-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-63
- ISSN
- 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1825
- OpenAlex
- W2089020888
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 179.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Précis of Knowledge and the Flow of Information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0140525x00014631
- The paper
- Dretske, F. I. (1983). Précis of Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00014631
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.