The DOI matches its Crossref record; 309 of the 312 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception
Open accessAbstract
The emulation theory of representation is developed and explored as a framework that can revealingly synthesize a wide variety of representational functions of the brain. The framework is based on constructs from control theory (forward models) and signal processing (Kalman filters). The idea is that in addition to simply engaging with the body and environment, the brain constructs neural circuits that act as models of the body and environment. During overt sensorimotor engagement, these models are driven by efference copies in parallel with the body and environment, in order to provide expectations of the sensory feedback, and to enhance and process sensory information. These models can also be run off-line in order to produce imagery, estimate outcomes of different actions, and evaluate and develop motor plans. The framework is initially developed within the context of motor control, where it has been shown that inner models running in parallel with the body can reduce the effects of feedback delay problems. The same mechanisms can account for motor imagery as the off-line driving of the emulator via efference copies. The framework is extended to account for visual imagery as the off-line driving of an emulator of the motor-visual loop. I also show how such systems can provide for amodal spatial imagery. Perception, including visual perception, results from such models being used to form expectations of, and to interpret, sensory input. I close by briefly outlining other cognitive functions that might also be synthesized within this framework, including reasoning, theory of mind phenomena, and language.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Predictive coding models are now well-established in accounting for various features of perception (Rao and Ballard, 1999; Yuille and Kersten, 2006), cognition (Grush, 2004), and motor control (Wolpert and Ghahramani, 2000)”
From An Interoceptive Predictive Coding Model of Conscious Presence (2012) · cites this paper as Grush, 2004
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Grush (2004) further proposes, based on the notion of a Kalman filter, that the proprioceptive and kinesthetic sensations produced during motor imagery are the consequences of emulation of planned motor commands.”
From Mental imagery of speech and movement implicates the dynamics of internal forward models (2010) · cites this paper as Grush, 2004
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Common features include the appeal to forward models and the provision of mechanisms (such as Kalman fi ltering -see Friston 2002; Grush 2004; Rao & Ballard 1999) for estimating uncertainty and (thus) fl exibly balancing the in fl uence of prior expectations and driving sensory inputs.”
From Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science (2013) · cites this paper as Grush 2004
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In addition, Grush ' s account of perception as ' environmental emulation ' (see section 5.2 of Grush 2004) looks highly congruent with the depiction (Friston 2003 and elsewhere) of perception as reconstructing the hidden causes structuring the sensory signal.”
From Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science (2013) · cites this paper as Grush 2004
In the citing paper
“For our couples, who have been in a committed relationship for some time, such familiarity can lead to greater neural synchrony, when familiar actions56 and communications57 are incorporated as neural predictions and pave the way for greater brain coordination.”
From Brain-to-Brain Synchrony during Naturalistic Social Interactions (2017) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems
Kalman, R. E. (1960) · Journal of Basic Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3662552 · Cited by 31,751
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2004.842673 · Cited by 25,268
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things
Lakoff, G. P. (1987) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 · Cited by 13,358
(1994) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,542
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind
Odlin, T., & Lakoff, G. P. (1988) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.2307/1982238 · Cited by 7,412
Barsalou, L. W. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002149 · Cited by 6,887
Ryle, G. (2006) · Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks · doi:10.5040/9798216413257.ch-2 · Cited by 6,804
GELB, A. (1974) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 6,405
New Results in Linear Filtering and Prediction Theory
Kalman, R. E., & Bucy, R. S. (1961) · Journal of Basic Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3658902 · Cited by 6,398
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- Dartnall, T. H. (2003) Externalism extended. In: Proceedings of the Joint Fourth International Conference on Cognitive Science and the Seventh Australasian Society for Cognitive Science Conference, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. July 2003, ed. P. Slezak, pp. 94 -99. The University of New South Wales Press.
- Dretske, F. I. (1988) Explaining behavior. MIT Press.
- Droulez, J. & Darlot, C. (1989) The geometric and dynamic implications of the coherence constraints in three-dimensional sensorimotor interactions. In: Attention and performance, vol. XIII, ed. M. Jeannerod, pp. 495 -526. Erlbaum.
- Eccles, J. C. (1979) Introductory remarks. In: Cerebro-cerebellar interactions, ed. J. Massion & K. Sasaki, pp. 10 -18. Elsevier.
- Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V. & Rizzolatti, G. (2000) Visuomotor neurons: Ambiguity of the discharge or "motor" perception? International Journal of Psychophysiology 35:165 -77.
- Feynman, R. P. (2001) The pleasure of finding things out, 1st edition. Penguin Books.
- Freides, D. (1974) Human information processing and sensory modality: Cross- modal functions, information complexity and deficit. Psychological Bulletin 81:284 -310.
- Graziano, M. S. A. (1999) Where is my arm? Relative role of vision and proprioception in the neural representation of limb position. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 96:10418 -21.
- Hanakawa, T., Immisch, I., Toma, K., Dimyan, M. A., van Gelderen, P. & Hallett, M. (2003c) Functional properties of brain areas associated with motor execution and imagery. Journal of Neurophysiology 89(2):989 -1002.
- Heisenberg, M. & Wolf, R. (1988) Reafferent control of optomotor yaw torque in Drosophila melongaster. Journal of Comparative Physiology A163:373-88.
- W. T. Miller, R. S. Sutton & P. J. Werbos. MIT Press.
- Hurley, S. (forthcoming a) Active perception and perceiving action: The shared circuits hypothesis. In: Perceptual experience, ed. T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne. Oxford University Press.
- Hurley, S. (forthcoming b) The shared circuits hypothesis: A unified functional architecture for control, imitation, and simulation. In: Perspectives on Imitation: From mirror neurons to memes, ed. S. Hurley & N. Chater. MIT Press.
- Johnson, M. (1987) The body in the mind. University of Chicago Press.
- 2003) The embodiment of intentionality In: Dynamical systems approaches to embodied cognition, ed. W. Tschacher, pp. 201-27. Springer Verlag.
- Karni, A., Meyer, G., Rey-Hipolito, C., Jezzard, P., Adams, M. M., Turner, R. & Ungerleider, L. G. (1998) The acquisition of skilled motor performance: Fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95:861-68.
- Kosslyn, S. M. (1994) Image and brain. MIT Press.
- Kosslyn, S. M., Ball, T. M. & Reiser, B. J. (1978) Visual imagers preserve metric spatial transformation: Evidence from studies of images scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4:47-60.
- M. S. Gazzaniga, pp. 1035 -42. MIT Press. [arRG, OW]
- Llinas, R. & Pare, D. (1991) On dreaming and wakefulness. Neuroscience 44(3):521-35.
- Matthews, P. B. C. (1959) The dependence of tension upon extension in the stretch reflex of the soleus of the decerebrate cat. Journal of Physiology 47:521-46.
- Mel, B. W. (1986) A connectionist learning model for 3-d mental rotation, zoom, and pan. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 562-71. Erlbaum. [aRG] (1988)
- Merfeld, D. M., Young, L., Oman, C. & Shelhamer, M. (1993) A multi-dimensional model of the effect of gravity on the spatial orientation of the monkey. Journal of Vestibular Research 3:141-61.
- Merfeld, D. M. & Zupan, L. H. (2002) Neural processing of gravitoinertial cues in humans. III. Modeling tilt and translation responses. Journal of Neurophysiology 87(2):819 -33.
- Milner, A. D. & Goodale, M. A. (1996) Visual brain in action. Oxford University Press.
- Naito, E., Ehrsson, H. H., Geyer, S., Zilles, K. & Roland, P. E. (1999) Illusory arm movements activate cortical motor areas: A PET study. Journal of Neuroscience 19:6134 -44.
- Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S. & Ric, F. (in press) Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
- O'Reilly, R. & Munakata, Y. (2000) Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience: Understanding the mind by simulating the brain. MIT Press.
- Pisella, L., Grea, H., Tilikete, C., Vighetto, A., Desmurget, M., Rode, G., Boisson, D. & Rossetti, Y. (2000) An "automatic pilot" for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: Toward reinterpreting optic ataxia. Nature Neuroscience 3(7):729 -36.
- Reed, C. (2002a) Chronometric comparisons of imagery to action: Visualizing versus physically performing springboard dives. Memory and Cognition 30(8):1169 -78.
- OD, CLR] (2002b) What is the body schema? In: The imitative mind, ed. A. Meltzoff & W. Prinz, pp. 233 -46. Cambridge University Press.
- Reisberg, D. & Chambers, D. (1991) Neither pictures nor propositions: What can we learn from a mental image? Canadian Journal of Psychology 45:366-52.
- Calvert, C. Spence & B. Stein, pp. 703-709. MIT Press.
- Shadmehr, R. & Wise, S. P. (2003) Motor learning and memory for reaching and pointing. In: The new cognitive neurosciences, 3rd edition, ed.
- M. S. Gazzaniga. MIT Press.
- Sperry, R. W. (1950) Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by vision inversion. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 43:482-89. [DMM, BW]
- Stein, B. E. & Meredith, M. A. (1993) Merging of the senses. MIT Press.
- Stojanov, G. (1997) Expectancy theory and interpretation of electroexpectograms (EXG) curves in the context of biological and machine intelligence. Ph.D. Thesis, Electrical Engineering Faculty, Saints Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Macedonia.
- Stojanov, G., Bozinovski, S. & Trajkovski, G. (1997a) Interactionist expectative view on agency and learning. IMACS Journal of Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 44:295 -310.
- 1997b) The status of representation in behaviour based robotic systems: The problem and a solution. Paper presented at the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Orlando, FL, 1997.
- Stojanov, G., Stefanovski, S. & Bozinovski, S. (1995) Expectancy based emergent environment models for autonomous agents. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Automatic Control and Computer Science, Iasi, Romania 1:217-21.
- Tomasino, B., Borroni, P., Isaja, A., Baldiserra, F. & Rumiati, R. I. (in press) The primary motor cortex subserves not only movements but also their imagination. Cognitive Neuropsychology.
- Tversky, B. (2000) Remembering spaces. In: The Oxford handbook of memory, ed.
- E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik. Oxford University Press.
- van Sommers, P. (1984) Drawing and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
- von Holst, E. & Mittelstädt, H. (1950/1973) Das Reafferenzprinzip: Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnerven-system und Peripherie. Naturwissenschaften 37:467-76. (Original German publication, 1950.) En- glish translation, 1973: The reafference principle. In: The behavioral physiology of animals and man. The collected papers of Erich von Holst, trans. R. Martin, pp. 139 -73. University of Miami Press. [JSJ, MLL, DMM, BW]
- Wachholder, K. & Altenburger, H. (1927/2002) Do our limbs have only one rest length. Simultaneously a contribution to the measurement of elastic forces in active and passive movements. Pflüger's Archive für die gesamte Physiologie 215:627-40. (English translation by D. Sternard, 2002.) [see trans. in Sternad 2002]. [MLL] (2002) Foundational experiments for current hypotheses on equilibrium point control in voluntary movements. Motor Control 6:299 -318. (English translation by D. Sternard, 2002.)
- Wang, H., Johnson, T. R. & Zhang, J. (2001) The mind's views of space. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference of Cognitive Science. Beijing.
- Wraga, M., Church, J. & Badre, D. (2002) Event-related fMRI study of imaginal self and object rotations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 104:144.
- R. Alterman & D. Kirsch, pp. 1275-80. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [HW]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 997
THE SUBCORTICAL FOUNDATIONS OF GRAMMATICALIZATION
Argyropoulos, G. P. D. (2008) · The Evolution of Language · doi:10.1142/9789812776129_0002 · Cited by 7
“The Cerebellar CorticoNuclear MicroComplex (CNMC) (Ito, 1984), i.e., the CB adaptive unit that learns based on error signals, becomes an internal model, an " emulator " (Grush, 2004), with signal-transfer characteristics identical to those of the copied cortical system (figure 1).”
Temporally remote destabilization of prediction after rare breaches of expectancy
Kühn, A. B., & Schubotz, R. I. (2011) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21325 · Cited by 7
“Accordingly, as long as they occur in an unpredictable fashion, rare breaches of expectancy should not cause sustained changes of what has been referred to as our internal models [Grush, 2004; Miall and Wolpert, 1996; Schubotz, 2007; Wolpert and Kawato, 1998].”
Grounding Action Representations
Weber, A. M., & Vosgerau, G. (2012) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-012-0088-1 · Cited by 7
Action-Awareness and the Active Mind
Carruthers, P. (2009) · Philosophical Papers · doi:10.1080/05568640903146443 · Cited by 7
“Indeed, such an account would even justify a (very different) version of Peacocke’s Principal Hypothesis, since it holds that one and the same mechanism (namely, the mindreading system, with access to perceptual and imagistic input) underlies awareness of both our physical actions and mental events of judging, decidin…”
InfluentialWhy motor simulation cannot explain affordance perception
Declerck, G. (2013) · Adaptive Behavior · doi:10.1177/1059712313488424 · Cited by 10
“…neurosciences (de’Sperati & Stucchi, 1997, 2000; Tucker & Ellis, 1998; Gallese, 2000; Ellis & Tucker, 2000; Tucker & Ellis, 2001, 2004; Hesslow, 2002; Grush, 2003, 2004, 2007; Garbarini & Adenzato, 2004; Tipper et al., 2006; Cisek, 2007; Coello & Delevoye-Turrell, 2007; Witt & Proffitt, 2008;…”
Cognitive Approaches to Spoken Language Technology
Moore, R. K. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-73819-2_6 · Cited by 7
“Such a ‘pseudo-closed-loop control system’ receives feedback, not from the target system, but from the output of the emulator [ 18 ] – see Fig. 6.2.”
Influential16 Adaptationism, Culture, and the Malleability of Human Nature
Sripada, C. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0016 · Cited by 7
Replies to Barrett, Corris and Chemero, and Hutto
Gallagher, S. (2019) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-018-01234-4 · Cited by 7
Calmels, C. (2019) · Neurophysiologie Clinique · doi:10.1016/j.neucli.2019.01.033 · Cited by 8
Neurodiversity as a Conceptual Lens and Topic of Cross-Cultural Study
Cascio, M. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.027 · Cited by 7
Hierarchies for Embodied Action Perception
Ognibene, D., Wu, Y. J., Lee, K., & Demiris, Y. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39875-9_5 · Cited by 7
“Recent studies [29, 33, 40, 56] collectively show that the presence of low level representations and simulation mechanisms strongly coupled with perception and motor control, is the foundation for building higher level processes and representations.”
The “book problem” and its neural correlates
Turner, P. (2013) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-013-0491-x · Cited by 7
“The emulation theory of representation (Grush 2004) is, in essence, an attempt to create a unified account of psychology .”
Gibbs, R. W. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805844.006 · Cited by 7
Imagerie motrice interne et simulation de l’action chez l’enfant
Guilbert, J., Jouen, F., Lehalle, H., & Molina, M. (2013) · L’Année psychologique · doi:10.4074/s0003503313003060 · Cited by 11
“221 ) de l’action à venir, ce qui permet de minimiser les délais de correction lorsqu’une perturbation survient durant l’exécution du mouvement (voir par exemple Edelman, 1992 ; Grush, 2004 ; Berthoz, 2008).”
Processing Streams in Auditory Cortex
Rauschecker, J. P. (2012) · Springer handbook of auditory research · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2350-8_2 · Cited by 9
“More recently, these models have been used to model perception and imagery as well (Wolpert et al., 2003; Grush, 2004).”
Consciousness: situated and social
Adolphs, R. (2007) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816789.031 · Cited by 7
Philosophy of the Cognitive Sciences
Bechtel, W., & Herschbach, M. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444315578.ch10 · Cited by 8
“Others, such as Rick Grush (2004) have tried to show how control theory, a dynamical approach, employs neural representations in accounting for motor control, and to extend this approach to other cognitive processes.”
The Representation of Time in Agency
Andersen, H. (2013) · doi:10.1002/9781118522097.ch27 · Cited by 7
“The emulation theory of representation (Grush 2004) gives us a handle on these kinds of tasks in terms of information processing, independently of the mechanisms by which it is implemented.”
Williams, D. G. (2018) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.17863/cam.33386 · Cited by 7
“As many have argued, this capacity for offline simulation seems to pave an attractive path from online sensorimotor control to more sophisticated cognitive capacities (Clark 2016; Colder 2011; Grush 2004).”
Kim, E., Lee, W. H., Seo, H. G., Nam, H. S., Kim, Y. J., Kang, M., Bang, M. S., Kim, S., & Oh, B. (2023) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-023-00956-x · Cited by 6
“It has been suggested that the cerebellum takes part in the modulation of internal representation of motor movement by forward model implemented in the region (Grush 2004).”
Chen, L., He, J., Zhang, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, L., Gu, B., Liu, X., & Ming, D. (2023) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2023.3324085 · Cited by 6
“Studieshaveshownthattheposteriorparietalcortexwill integrate multimodal sensory information with motor planning information [10] and be used to judge body posture and rehearse movements [11], [12], [13].”
Davis, A. D., Scott, M. W., Pond, A. K., Hurst, A., Yousef, T., & Kraeutner, S. N. (2024) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.109013 · Cited by 6
“In particular, emulation theory (Grush, 2004) proposes MI and the forward model to play functionally similar roles – predicting action consequences (see Kilteni et al., 2018 for supporting evidence) in the absence of processing sensory reafference (Jessey et al., 2023).”
Beyond the neural underpinnings of action emulation in expert athletes: An EEG study
Wilken, S., Böttcher, A., Beste, C., Raab, M., & Hoffmann, S. F. (2025) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109085 · Cited by 7
Muraki, E. J., Pexman, P. M., & Binney, R. J. (2025) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.70210 · Cited by 7
Dindo, H., & Chella, A. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39405-8_29 · Cited by 6
“In this vein, it has been suggested that control-theoretic models of individual motor control can be extended to explain complex phenomena in social cognition [18,19].”
Kirmayer, L. J., Gómez-Carrillo, A., Langlois‐Thérien, T., Ramstead, M. J. D., & Gold, I. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.012 · Cited by 6
Fazeli, D., Taheri, H., & Kakhki, A. S. (2021) · Motor Control · doi:10.1123/mc.2020-0021 · Cited by 6
Gesture formation: A crucial building block for cognitive-based Human–Robot Partnership
Morasso, P. (2021) · Cognitive Robotics · doi:10.1016/j.cogr.2021.06.004 · Cited by 7
Smoothness Discriminates Physical from Motor Imagery Practice of Arm Reaching Movements
Ruffino, C., Monany, D. R., Papaxanthis, C., Hilt, P. M., Gaveau, J., & Lebon, F. (2021) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.12.022 · Cited by 9
Koordination sportlicher Bewegungen – Sportmotorik
Hossner, E.-J., Müller, H., & Voelcker‐Rehage, C. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-64695-3_8 · Cited by 6
Syrov, N., Yakovlev, L., Kaplan, A., & Lebedev, M. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhad440 · Cited by 7
Role of the Cerebellum in the Construction of Functional and Geometrical Spaces
Torkhani, E., Bennequin, D., & de Marco, G. (2024) · The Cerebellum · doi:10.1007/s12311-024-01693-y · Cited by 7
“For - ward models also termed ‘predictors’ [184] or ‘emulators’ [185].”
Self, Brain, Microbe, and the Vanishing Commissar
Young, A. (2010) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243910388024 · Cited by 6
“Its original function is to permit the organism to adjust and improve the efficiency of its own ongoing behavior, be emulating the stored activation pattern that fits best (Grush 2004).”
Machine Consciousness: A Modern Approach
Manzotti, R. (2013) · Cited by 6
Embodiment and Social Interaction
Lindblom, J. (2015) · Cognitive systems monographs · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20315-7_4 · Cited by 7
Tool Use Unravels Body Morphology Representation in the Brain
Martel, M., Cardinali, L., Roy, A. C., Farnè, A., de Vignemont, F., & Alsmith, A. J. T. (2017) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/10462.003.0005 · Cited by 10
Neural Representations Beyond “Plus X”
Plebe, A., & Cruz, V. M. D. L. (2018) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-018-9457-6 · Cited by 6
“For example, it is a crucial feature in the emulator theory of Grush (2004).”
Xu, Z., & Liu, D. (2020) · Journal of Research in Reading · doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12329 · Cited by 6
Decision-making in Shiatsu bodywork: complementariness of embodied coupling and conceptual inference
Kimmel, M., & Irran, C. (2021) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-020-09718-7 · Cited by 6
“Regarding cognitive science, our discussion speaks to the current debates on how socalled higher-level cognition sits with dynamic, interactive, and sensorimotor aspects (Bickhard and Terveen 1995; Clark 1997, 2008; Eliasmith 2012; Grush 2004; Kirsh 1991; Ramsey 2007; Smith 2010; Wheeler 2005).”
Synthetic Information Environments for Policy Informatics: A Distributed Cognition Perspective
Barrett, C. L., Eubank, S., Marathe, A., MARATHE, M. V., & Swarup, S. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315736211-27 · Cited by 6
Candidi, M., Aglioti, S. M., & Haggard, P. (2012) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-012-0091-6 · Cited by 6
“Interestingly, when a person uses this capacity to simulate the somatomotor states of another individual, he/she must detach, at least partially, from his/her own current sensory states (Grush 2004).”
Grush, R. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195304787.003.0013 · Cited by 10
Self-citationRevisiting the acute effects of resistance exercise on motor imagery ability
Kanthack, T. F. D., Guillot, A., Blache, Y., & Rienzo, F. D. (2021) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113441 · Cited by 6
A Study of Off-Line Uses of Anticipation
Pezzulo, G. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69134-1_37 · Cited by 6
“As argued in [ 4 ,17], we believe that o-line, mental simulation is a suitable, embodied alternative to ‘reasoning by symbol-crunching’ of traditional AI systems, since it permits internal manipulation of (anticipatory) representations without losing grounding and situatedness.”
InfluentialManipulating space: modelling the role of transient dynamics in inattentional blindness
Morse, A. F., Lowe, R. J., & Tom Ziemke, B. (2009) · Connection Science · doi:10.1080/09540090902924025 · Cited by 6
“According to Noë’s (2004) enactive approach, sensorimotor knowledge allows us to anticipate or predict the sensory changes resulting from performing an action.”
InfluentialLe possible peut-il être perçu ?
Declerck, G. (2013) · Tracés · doi:10.4000/traces.5648 · Cited by 6
Towards anticipatory service composition in Ambient Intelligence
Charif, Y., Stathis, K., & Mili, H. (2010) · International Conference on New Technologies of Distributed Systems (NOTERE) · doi:10.1109/notere.2010.5536832 · Cited by 6
“In fact, it crucially depends on mechanisms permitting to emulate the external reality as claimed by [33], [34] (see our discussion in IV-A).”
Bubić, A., von Cramon, D. Y., & Schubotz, R. I. (2009) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.07030.x · Cited by 7
“incoming perceptual events (Wolpert & Kawato, 1998; Grush, 2004).”
Wordsworth’s “First-Born Affinities”: Intimations of Embodied Cognition
Miall, D. S. (2011) · Poetics Today · doi:10.1215/03335372-1459854 · Cited by 6
Reply to commentary by Moore and Haggard
Hall, L., Johansson, P., Sikström, S., Tärning, B., & Lind, A. (2006) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2006.10.001 · Cited by 7
“CBP. In contrast to our exploratory work on choice blindness, the research on agency they present is carried by a strong theoretical framework developed within the field of computational motor control (e.g., Wolpert & Ghahramani, 2004, and taken to its limit as a general model of cognition by Grush, 2004 ).”
Modeling the Role of Energy Management in Embodied Cognition
Montebelli, A. (2012) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 6
Fuzzy-based Schema Mechanisms in AKIRA
Pezzulo, G., Ognibene, D., Calvi, G., & Lalia, D. (2006) · Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation · doi:10.1109/cimca.2005.1631459 · Cited by 6
“There are also applications of Kalman Filters in cognitive modeling, such as the emulation theory of [7], where anticipatory mechanisms are used for action control and learning; what is new in [20] is their use for Schemas selection.”
Parrotta, E., McDonough, K. L., & Bach, P. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.06.07.544005 · Cited by 6
“The findings we report here are in line with recent theoretical “predictive processing” proposals that liken imagery and predictive processes (Dijkstra et al., 2017, 2020; Grush, 2004; Moulton & Kosslyn, 2009).”
InfluentialSandini, G., Sciutti, A., & Morasso, P. (2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1608014 · Cited by 8
“…O’Shea and Moran, 2017) and different forms of a simulation theory of cognition (Decety and Ingvar, 1990; Jeannerod, 2001; Hesslow, 2002, 2012; Grush, 2004; Ptak et al., 2017); an essential part of this theory is that the simulation is performed by the same neural mechanisms as those…”
Bogotá, J. D. (2023) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-023-09898-y · Cited by 5
Predictive coding and the Bayesian brain: Intractability hurdles that are yet to be overcome.
Kwisthout, J., & van Rooij, I. (2013) · Cognitive Science · Cited by 5
Reconciling Autonomy with Utility: A Roadmap and Architecture for Cognitive Development
Vernon, D. (2011) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-959-2-412 · Cited by 4
“…and prospective, they must have a mechanism to rehearse hypothetical scenarios through some process of internal simulation in order to predict, explain, and imagine events, and they must have a mechanism to use this outcome to modulate the behaviour of the system [16] [17] [18] [19] [20].”
Autonomous Vehicle Architecture Inspired by the Neurocognition of Human Driving
Lio, M. D., Plebe, A., Bortoluzzi, D., Papini, G. P. R., & Donà, R. (2018) · International Conference on Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems (VEHITS) · doi:10.5220/0006785605070513 · Cited by 6
“One of the earlier proposals in this direction is the theory of neural emulators (Grush, 2004), that bridges a close link between the engineering domain of con-”
Cultural Priming Effects and the Human Brain
Han, S., & Northoff, G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.011 · Cited by 5
Kirmayer, L. J., Worthman, C. M., & Kitayama, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.002 · Cited by 6
Exploring the Link between Novel Task Proceduralization and Motor Simulation
Palenciano, A. F., González‐García, C., Houwer, J. D., Braß, M., & Liefooghe, B. (2021) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.190 · Cited by 5
Sensory attenuation from action observation
Scott, M. (2022) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-022-06460-1 · Cited by 6
“2002; Grush 2004; Sato 2009; Scott and Chiu 2021), but the key use, in terms of the theory explored here, is the ‘sensorytagging’ function: Forward-models provide a way to ‘tag’ self-produced sensations as such and so avoid the confusion between self-caused and other-caused sensations that would…”
Yang, Y., Yang, H., Imai, F., & Ogawa, K. (2023) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/j.neures.2023.01.001 · Cited by 4
Online corrections can occur within movement imagery: An investigation of the motor-cognitive model
Owen, R., Wakefield, C. J., & Roberts, J. W. (2024) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2024.103222 · Cited by 6
Visual mental imagery of nonpredictive central social cues triggers automatic attentional orienting
Zhang, S., Wang, L., & Jiang, Y. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105968 · Cited by 6
Miroshnikov, A., Yakovlev, L., Syrov, N., Vasilyev, A. N., Berkmush-Antipova, A., Golovanov, F., & Kaplan, A. (2024) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-024-01075-x · Cited by 5
“This credibly reflects that MI shares neural substrates with actual move - ment (Grush 2004; Gerardin et al. 2000; Sharma and Baron 2013 ).”
Sensory Entrained TMS ( seTMS ) Enhances Motor Cortex Excitability
Ross, J. M., Forman, L., Gogulski, J., Hassan, U., Cline, C. C., Parmigiani, S., Truong, J. T., Hartford, J. D., Chen, N.-F., Fujioka, T., et al. (2025) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.70267 · Cited by 6
“…exist to explain the relationship between sensory timing and covert action (Balasubramaniam et al. 2021; Patel and Iversen 2014; Rauschecker 2011; Grush 2004; Wolpert et al. 2003; Schubotz 2007; Schubotz et al. 2000), with an emerging understanding that this action-perception relationship is an…”
Space Perception through Visuokinesthetic Prediction
Schenck, W. (2009) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02565-5_14 · Cited by 5
“[4]) and cognition (e.”
Vacarìu, G. (2011) · Open Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.4236/ojpp.2011.11005 · Cited by 6
Caçola, P. M., & Pant, M. D. (2014) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/27.10.pms.119c21z0 · Cited by 5
“Associated with this visuomotor mapping, a predictive system provides anticipatory information about action outcome (forward model, Wolpert & Kawato, 1998; Grush, 2004; Choudhury, Charman, Bird, & Blakemore, 2007).”
Internalism, Active Externalism, and Nonconceptual Content: The Ins and Outs of Cognition
Dartnall, T. (2007) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1080/15326900701221272 · Cited by 5
“In his reply, Grush (2004) said, 'I agree entirely with this suggestion, and in fact in Grush (2003) I discuss this briefly' (p. 430).”
InfluentialRepresentation Recovers Information
Thornton, C. (2009) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01066.x · Cited by 5
“Also significant for the way they explore the connection between sensing and representation are the approaches of Gärdenfors (2000), Hesslow (2002) and Grush (2004) .”
Finding Rhythm in Speech: A Response to Cummins
Moore, R. K. (2012) · Empirical Musicology Review · doi:10.18061/1811/52977 · Cited by 5
“Some of the latest theories of action understanding invoke significant neurophysiological overlap between sensory and motor systems such that an observer’s own motor planning system is implicated in the interpretation of observed behaviour in others through a mechanism of emulation and synchronisation (Grush, 2004).”
Hanakawa, T. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-54541-5_5 · Cited by 2
Toward mechanistic models of action-oriented and detached cognition
Pezzulo, G. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x15001648 · Cited by 5
Ritual and Religion as Social Technologies of Cooperation
Kavanagh, C. M., Jong, J., & Whitehouse, H. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.016 · Cited by 7
Pinocchio: A language for action representation
Morasso, P., & Mohan, V. (2022) · Cognitive Robotics · doi:10.1016/j.cogr.2022.03.007 · Cited by 6
Dahm, S. F., & Rieger, M. (2023) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2023.103154 · Cited by 7
“Action imagery is assumed to involve similar mechanisms to optimize and predict action consequences as they are used in action execution (Dahm, Weigelt, & Rieger, 2023; Grush, 2004; Jeannerod, 2001; Rieger et al., 2023).”
12 The Creative Aspect of Language Use and Nonbiological Nativism
Baker, M. C. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195332827.003.0012 · Cited by 6
Korneev, A. A., & Kurgansky, А. V. (2014) · Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology · doi:10.1007/s11055-014-9998-y · Cited by 5
How “Authentic Intentionality” can be Enabled: a Neurocomputational Hypothesis
Colombo, M. (2010) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-010-9192-0 · Cited by 5
“At least some brain circuits seem to act as models of other, usually extra-neural, systems (Grush 2004).”
Temporal dynamics of action contribution to object categorization
Perilli, F. G., Barrada, J. R., & Maiche, A. (2013) · Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) · Cited by 5
The Role of Motor System in Mental Rotation: New Insights from Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1
Cona, G., Casagrande, A., Lenzoni, S., Pegoraro, E., Bozzoni, V., Bello, L., Sorarú, G., Botta, A., & Semenza, C. (2019) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617719001383 · Cited by 5
“For example, visual mental simulation is the result of predicted sensory feedback formulated by a forward model on the basis of motor inputs, which are in turn the consequence of the body representation (Grush, 2004; Schubotz, 2007).”
Dopaminergic drugs alter beta coherence during motor imagery and motor execution in healthy adults
Alves, D. D. P. A., Tanaka, G. K., Bittencourt, J., Gongora, M., Teixeira, S. S., Cagy, M., Budde, H., Orsini, M., Ribeiro, P. F. M., & Velasques, B. (2020) · Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria · doi:10.1590/0004-282x20190186 · Cited by 5
“The stimulus was a yellow square, that lasted (1) second, with a four-second (4) interval between the stimuli.”
The Cultural Brain as Historical Artifact
Boddice, R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.018 · Cited by 6
Schellenberg, S. (2007) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 5
Learning Problem Solving Skills from Demonstration: An Architectural Approach
Dindo, H., Chella, A., Tona, G. L., Vitali, M., Nivel, E., & Þórisson, K. R. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22887-2_20 · Cited by 6
“It is thought that similar mechanisms could lead to higher cognitive processes like imagery, anticipation and theory of mind [4, 5]”
How we remember what we can do
Declerck, G. (2015) · Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology · doi:10.3402/snp.v5.24807 · Cited by 5
“…and Stucchi (1997, 2000), but was chiefly systematized by Jeannerod (1994, 2001, 2006), Jeannerod et al. (1995), Gallese (2000), Hesslow (2002), Grush (2003, 2004, 2007), Garbarini and Adenzato (2004), Coello and Delevoye-Turrell (2007), Cisek (2007), Witt and Proffitt (2008), Pezzulo (2008),…”
Violation of expectation: Neural correlates reflect bases of prediction
Bubić, A., von Cramon, D., Jacobsen, T., Schröger, E., & Schubotz, R. (2008) · RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren · doi:10.1055/s-2008-1060341 · Cited by 5
Interaction between Mental Rotation and Manual Rotation with and without Motor Planning
Nishihara, S., Imai, F., Fujiki, A., & Majima, Y. (2015) · Psychology · doi:10.4236/psych.2015.69106 · Cited by 5
“…from a motor plan itself because a bare motor plan is either a dynamic plan (a temporal sequence of motor commands or muscle tensions) or a kinematic plan (a plan for limb movement specified in terms of joint angles) that is different from proprioceptive/ kinesthetic feelings (Grush, 2004).”
Sloman, A. (2008) · DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · doi:10.4230/dagsemproc.08091.4 · Cited by 5
Unity and Autonomy in Expressivist Logic
Cantwell, J. (2014) · dialectica · doi:10.1111/1746-8361.12072 · Cited by 5
Emergence of an Internal Model in Evolving Robots Subjected to Sensory Deprivation
Gigliotta, O., Pezzulo, G., & Nolfi, S. (2010) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15193-4_54 · Cited by 6
“Our study is part of a more general initiative in cognitive science that aims to draw a naturalized, embodied view of cognition by tracing it back to sensorimotor learning and motor control, some of which maintaining a representational perspective [9,12], and some others not [26].”
InfluentialMiglino, O., & Ponticorvo, M. (2014) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/8493.003.0006 · Cited by 5
Piccinini, G. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198866282.003.0004 · Cited by 5
Skoyles, J. R., & Skoyles, J. R. (2008) · Nature Precedings · doi:10.1038/npre.2008.2092.1 · Cited by 5
Consciousness as Recursive, Spatiotemporal Self-LocationPreprint
Peters, F. (2009) · Nature Precedings · doi:10.1038/npre.2009.2444.2 · Cited by 4
Olsson, C.-J. (2008) · DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University) · Cited by 5
Differences between Industrial Models of Autonomy and Systemic Models of AutonomyPreprint
Lodwich, A. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.07335 · Cited by 5
Contents, vehicles, and complex data analysis in neuroscience
Burnston, D. C. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02831-9 · Cited by 5
“I take three of the most interesting forms of responses to the challenge to be those that posit a certain kind of structure for representations (Isaac 2013), those that tie the function of representation to serving as an internal model (Grush 2004), and those that, as discussed in Sect.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Grush, R.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grush, Rick
- ORCID
- Grush, Rick
- Venue
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 377-396
- ISSN
- 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1825
- OpenAlex
- W2123786976
- Cited by
- 1,387
- References
- 312
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 136 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 97 · 2012: 50
- FWCI
- 19.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.escholarship.org
- Locations
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15700257, 15016113)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Keywords
- forward model, Kalman filter, efference copy, sensorimotor control, motor imagery, visual imagery, perception, feedback delay, motor planning, theory of mind, language, reasoning
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Environment, Humans, Imagination, Language, Models, Theoretical, Perception, Psychomotor Performance, Psychophysiology, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review