The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
More to morality than mutualism: Consistent contributors exist and they can inspire costly generosity in others
Abstract
Studies of economic decision-making have revealed the existence of consistent contributors, who always make contributions to the collective good. It is difficult to understand such behavior in terms of mutualistic motives. Furthermore, consistent contributors can elicit apparently altruistic behavior from others. Therefore, although mutualistic motives are likely an important contributor to moral action, there is more to morality than mutualism.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Construing the same action in moral versus pragmatic terms may ultimately lead to different evaluations and behavior.
“As such, construing the same action in moral versus pragmatic terms may ultimately lead to different evaluations and behavior [84], [85].”
From The Importance of Moral Construal: Moral versus Non-Moral Construal Elicits Faster, More Extreme, Universal Evaluations of the Same Actions (2012) · cites this paper as [84]
Citations
Cites
Tetlock, P. E. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.451 · Cited by 646
The Martyrdom Effect: When Pain and Effort Increase Prosocial Contributions
Olivola, C. Y., & Shafir, E. B. (2011) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.767 · Cited by 246
Van Bavel, J. J., Packer, D. J., Haas, I. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048693 · Cited by 107
Self-citationSuckers or saviors? Consistent contributors in social dilemmas.
Weber, J. M., & Murnighan, J. K. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012454 · Cited by 104
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Packer D. J. & Gill M. J. (2011) Having good values is not enough: Altruistic values require a situational trigger before they foster generosity in a social dilemma. Paper presented at 14th International Conference on Social Dilemmas, Amsterdam, Netherlands, July 2011.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Van Bavel, J. J., Packer, D. J., Haas, I. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048693 · Cited by 107
Self-citationHow neurons, norms, and institutions shape group cooperation
Bavel, J. J. V., Pärnamets, P., Reinero, D. A., & Packer, D. J. (2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2022.04.004 · Cited by 9
Self-citationZhang, Q., Chen, Y., Tao, Y. F., Farid, T., & Ma, J. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11071874 · Cited by 7
The moral continuum: Congruence, consistency, and continuity in moral cognition
James, A. J. (2017) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354317718637 · Cited by 2
The Social Neuroscience of CooperationPreprint
Bavel, J. J. V. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/8kcd4 · Cited by 1
Zhang, Q., Ma, J., Wang, Y., Lu, X., & Fan, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1005772
Prosocial and antisocial behavior and personality
(2023) · Frontiers research topics · doi:10.3389/978-2-8325-3494-6
Metadata
- Authors
- Gill, M. J., Packer, D. J., & Van Bavel, J.
- Affiliations
- Lehigh University (US)
- Venue
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90-90
- ISSN
- 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1825
- OpenAlex
- W2070843004
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2022: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Keywords
- moral behavior, mutualism, altruism, prosocial behavior, economic decision-making, moral motivation
- MeSH terms
- Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Marriage, Morals, Sexual Partners
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review