Cited by 158Embodied and Extended CognitionAction Observation and SynchronizationFree Will and Agency

Are we predictive engines? Perils, prospects, and the puzzle of the porous perceiver

Open access
Clark, Andy·2013·Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Abstract

The target article sketched and explored a mechanism (action-oriented predictive processing) most plausibly associated with core forms of cortical processing. In assessing the attractions and pitfalls of the proposal we should keep that element distinct from larger, though interlocking, issues concerning the nature of adaptive organization in general.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0140525x12002440

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A motive itself can be conceived of as being set to expect a particular input, along the lines proposed in predictive coding theory.

    “A motive itself can be conceived of as being set to expect a particular input, along the lines proposed in predictive coding theory (Von Holst and Mittelstaedt, 1950; Friston, 2012; Clark, 2013).”

    From Impulsive action: emotional impulses and their control (2014) · cites this paper as Clark, 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, A.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Clark, Andy
Venue
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Published
2013-05-10
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
233-253
ISSN
  • 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1825
OpenAlex
W2312203572
Cited by
158
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
11.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Edinburgh
  • Ruhr-Universität Bochum
  • School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
predictive processing, adaptive organizations, cortical processing, perception
MeSH terms
Attention, Brain, Cognition, Humans, Perception, Cognitive Science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review