Cited by 43Reading and Literacy DevelopmentLanguage Development and DisordersSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

Common and distinct cognitive bases for reading in English–Cantonese bilinguals

Open access
LUK, GIGI, BIALYSTOK, ELLEN·2008·Applied Psycholinguistics

Abstract

The study explores the relationship between phonological awareness and early reading for bilingual children learning to read in two languages that use different writing systems. Participants were 57 Cantonese–English bilingual 6-year-olds who were learning to read in both languages. The children completed cognitive measures, phonological awareness tasks, and word identification tests in both languages. Once cognitive abilities had been controlled, there was no correlation in word identification ability performance across languages, but the correspondence in phonological awareness measures remained strong. This pattern was confirmed by a principal components analysis and hierarchical regression that demonstrated a different role for each phonological awareness factor in reading performance in each language. The results indicate that phonological awareness depends on a set of cognitive abilities that is applied generally across languages and that early reading depends on a common set of cognitive abilities in conjunction with skills specific to different writing systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0142716407080125

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [12]12. Coulmas, F. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  2. [57]57. Wagner, R. K., & McBride-Chang, C. (1996). The development of reading-related phonological processing abilities. Annals of Child Development, 12, 177-206.

Authors
LUK, G., & BIALYSTOK, E.
Affiliations
York University (CA)
Corresponding author
BIALYSTOK, ELLEN
Venue
Applied Psycholinguistics
Published
2008-04
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
269-289
ISSN
  • 0142-7164 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1817
OpenAlex
W2167036132
Cited by
43
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Psycholinguistics (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
phonological awareness, early reading, bilingual children, word recognition, writing systems, language transfer, cognitive ability, reading acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review